Section 1113 - Judgment Search Results

Chennai Petroleum Corporation Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC305

..... buyer he cannot come forward to claim the refund in terms of section 1113 of the act we observe that the appellants have clearly stated that ..... specifically mentioned that m s cpcl shall claim refund in terms of section 11b she has submitted that any reimbursement made to the buyer ..... by way of credit notes is not mandated by the provisions of section 11b of the act in the present case the refund claims .....

Cce Vs. Siv Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC377

..... a clear passing of the duty so as to attract provisions of section 1113 of the ce act 1944 it was also contended by the revenue ..... any other aspect if one reads the second proviso to sub section 1 of section 11b alongwith the definition of relevant date there is no room ..... is that a in case of provisional assessments the ingredients of section 11a or section 11b will not come into play b however in the .....

Precision Controls Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2005)(98)ECC289

..... barred according to our understanding when the remedy under section 1113 is barred it is not open to the commissioner of ..... no power to relax the period of limitation prescribed under section 11b and section 27 respectively of the two acts the lower authority by ..... had no power to relax the statutory time limit prescribed under section 11b hence the belated claims were rightly rejected by the .....

N.T.C. (Wbab and O) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Anjan K. Saha

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC4255; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)1154; 2004(4)AWC3018(SC); 2004(4)CTC455; JT2004(9)SC109; (2004)IIILLJ757SC; 2004(7)SCALE128; (2004)7SCC581; 2005(1)SLJ215(SC)

d m dharmadhikari j 1 this appeal is preferred by national textile corporation wbab o ltd under whose employment the...

Sobha Kumar Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2004(2)KLT755

kurian joseph j 1 assessment of suitability under rule 28 of the ks ssr is generally oh consideration of the...

Samarendra Kishore Endow Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court: Guwahati

2000 sc 1151 2000 3 scc 450 2000 i llj 1113 9 controverting the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner

Nadim Ahmad and ors. Vs. Regional Secretary, High School and Intermedi ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2004(3)AWC2826

dubey v university of kanpar and anr 1990 2 awc 1113 1990 2 uplbec 1053 and another decision of the apex

San Diego Vs. Roe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... stripping off a police uniform and masturbating he sold the video on the adults only section of ebay the popular online auction site his user name was codestud3 aol com a ..... his employer s premises and was unrelated to his employment 356 f 3d at 1110 1113 1114 ii a government employee does not relinquish all first amendment rights otherwise enjoyed by .....

H.P. State Forest Corporation Ltd. Vs. Ganu Devi and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: I(2005)ACC725,2006ACJ624,(2005)IILLJ827HP

..... question compensation assessed was deposited so as to meet the requirement of section 30 of the workmen s compensation act 1923 to maintain this ..... it has to be taken as prospectively applicable according to him under section 4 1 explanation ii monthly wage of a workman like deceased ..... and ors v senen fernandez alias jose and ors 1995 ii llj 1113 of the division bench of kerala high court at p 1115 .....

Hyderabad Industries Ltd. Vs. Nuclear Power Corpn. of India Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(1)ARBLR352(Bom); 2005(1)BomCR833

..... within four weeks from today 2 this is a petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 the petitioner seeks ..... list of approved vendors sub vendors sub contractors is shown as section e to this purchase order in the event the contractor ..... guarantees mr presswala conceded that two guarantees bearing nos 1112 and 1113 were in part not validly invoked and stated on instructions that .....