Section 1113 - Judgment Search Results

Eveready Industries India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal

..... clear cut language employed in sub clause it of sub section 1 of section 32ab the expression used is profits of eligible business eligible ..... of the gas leak tragedy the central government filed suit no 1113 of 1986 before the district judge bhopal against the appellant company ..... court bhopal stands discharged and all orders passed in suit no 1113 of 1986 and or in any revision therefrom also stand .....

Eveready Industries India Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2001]78ITD175(Cal)

..... order passed by the commissioner appeals deleting the addition made in section 143 1 a 154 proceeding for the assessment year 1989 90 ..... of the gas leak tragedy the central government filed suit no 1113 of 1986 before the district judge bhopal against the appellant company ..... court bhopal stands discharged and all orders passed in suit no 1113 of 1986 and or in any revision therefrom also stand discharged .....

Ramdass Vs. Angelone

Court: US Supreme Court

..... separate sentencing for a prior conviction for violent crimes as defined in section 16 1 60 provided that where more than one included offense ..... conduct such multiple offenses must be treated for purposes of this section as one offense 6 see e g state v mckay 300 ..... claims of trial error dipaola v riddle 581 f 2d 1111 1113 ca4 1978 in contexts beyond the threestrikes statute virginia courts have .....

Galaxy Knives Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(119)ELT88Tri(Mum.)bai

..... therefore prevail over the generic description of rectangular square shape of cross section of 2 50 000 sq mm below of forged rolled tool and ..... same person and after hearing him collector confiscated the seized goods under section 111 d of customs act with redemption fine of rs 80 ..... ms tisco v collector of customs in 1983 13 e l t 1113 10 according to invoice no 32 760380 k goods imported are described .....

Muva Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... the first class shall try any offence punishable under this act d section 28 inspecting staff 1 the appropriate government may by notification in the ..... labour for any work of the establishment and includes a subcontractor c section 26 cognizance of offences no court shall take cognizance of any ..... ors air 1997 sc 645 1997 9 scc 377 1997 i llj 1113 which was a case decided by a bench consisting of three .....

State of West Bengal Vs. M/S. Shrey Marcentile Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2001)1CALLT58(HC)

..... predecessor in interest of the applicant 14 sub section 5 of section 183 read with section 602 thus empowers the corporation only to prescribe ..... said to be regulatory in nature the provisions of sub section 5 of section 183 of the calcutta municipal corporation act clearly provides ..... usefully be quoted at p 1113 of air this contention is not really open to the respondent for section 548 does not use .....

Chief Engineer Ranjit Sagar Dam Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC145

of the meaning of the word manufacture as envisaged under section 2 1 of the act to attract duty in para

Dhanalakshmi Steels Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC535

rolling steel mills annual capacity determination rules 1997 and also section 35b 1 of the central excise rules this is the

Bharat Seats Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT149TriDel

of automobile seats and penalty of equal amount imposed under section 11ac of the central excise act the learned senior counsel

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. U.P. Steels

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT693TriDel

the duty amount of rs 72502 69 under proviso to section 11 a of the central excises act 1944 for having