Screen - Judgment Search Results

Saroj Screens Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Ghahshyam and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2012AIRSCW2081

..... hereinafter called the lessor of the one part and messrs saroj screens ltd amraoti a joint stock company with limited liability represented ..... take notice yours faithfully sd advocatecounsel for m s saroj screens pvt ltd the letter is self explanatory it clearly calls ..... resolution reads as under resolution no 137 since messrs saroj screen private limited has been paying from time to time ground .....

Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. M ...

Court: Mumbai

the petitioner a government of maharashtra corporation original respondent has challenged arbitral award dated 28 july 2008 the operative part...

Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. M ...

Court: Mumbai

the petitioner a government of maharashtra corporation original respondent has challenged arbitral award dated 28 july 2008 the operative part...

Nb Sub Gulab Rao Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... appendix at para 3 reads as under 3 method of screening screening of the affected pbor for the grant of extension should be ..... cases or any other circumstances beyond his control will be screened by the screening board before retirement 17 at para 6 it ..... cases or any other circumstances beyond his control will be screened by the screening board before retirement 25 reading of the two provisions .....

Nb Sub Rajendra Pal Singh (Skt) Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... appendix at para 3 reads as under 3 method of screening screening of the affected pbor for the grant of extension should be ..... cases or any other circumstances beyond his control will be screened by the screening board before retirement 15 at para 6 it ..... cases or any other circumstances beyond his control will be screened by the screening board before retirement 25 reading of the two provisions .....

Vipul Gupta Vs. State and Others

Court: Delhi

..... joon to initiate the process of reconsideration of the earlier recommendation he submits that the screening committee did not even meet before recommending reconsideration of the earlier recommendation made in ..... to revoke the earlier recommendation dated 13 09 2011 according to the petitioners the screening committee should have been reconvened before recommending to the hon 8217 ble lt governor .....

Todar Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

..... the committee recommended that the petitioner should be compulsory retired 6 based on the screening committee s report the petitioner filed a supplementary affidavit along with an application ..... opinion that the overall performance which has been depicted in the report of the screening committee clearly indicates the inefficiency of the petitioner while discharging the official work consequently .....

Kalinga Power Corporation Ltd Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

..... subsequently cement producers were also permitted to do coal mining for captive use that the screening committee was constituted to consider proposals requests for allocation of coal blocks for captive use ..... ministry of coal with reference to its application dated 06 05 1992 informed that the screening committee had identified the aforesaid coal block as suitable for development by the petitioner as .....

Vice Chancellor, Kerala Agrl. University Post Vellayanikkara Vs. Dr. P ...

Court: Kerala

..... decided to place the matter before the executive committee for taking a decision regarding re screening 7 the executive committee appointed the redressal committee as a competent committee for examining ..... does not have a case that the redressal committee was constituted irregularly 8 the screening committee denied promotion to the first respondent on the reasoning that his contributions were .....

Lloyds Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... dahe gaon makardhokra iv however the application of the petitioner was rejected by the screening committee the petitioner claims that the names of ineligible and undeserving applicants were recommended ..... reasons whatsoever for the impugned actions as per the petitioner the recommendation of the screening committee merely states that it has assessed the applications having regard to certain matters .....