Court : Karnataka
- 1 - WP No.28392 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION No.28392 OF2018(L-RES) BETWEEN: TUMAKURU CITY CORPORATION, (EARLIER TUMKUR TOWN MUNICIPALCORPORATION TUMAKURU572102. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUBRAMANYA R., ADVOCATE) AND:1. TUMKURU POURA KARMIKARA SANGHA (REGD.) JAI BHEEM ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, TUMAKURU 572 102 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY2 SRI D. GANESH SHANKAR S/O. LATE SRI. CHINNA VENKANNA AGED ABOUT76YEARS R/AT "SRIHARI NILAYA" NO.37, 8TH CROSS, KJE LAYOUT, RMV2D STAGE, BENGALURU 560 094.3. SRI M VENKATESH (FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) - 2 - WP No.28392 of 2018 AGED MAJOR R/AT24H MAIN, 13TH CROSS, HSR LAYOUT, AGARA, BENGALURU 560 102.4. STATE OF KARNATAKA URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., VIDHANA SOUDHA B. R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU560001 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY5 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TUMAKURU DISTRICT TUMAKURU572102. RESPO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - MFA No.7404 of 2014 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. JOSHI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.7404 OF2014(MV-D) BETWEEN:1. SMT MARIYAMMA W/O SRI LATE HUCCHELLAPPA GRAND MOTHER OF SUDHAKAR AGED ABOUT62YEARS R/AT No.192, GUDDAHATTI CHANDAPUR CIRCLE ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN - 562 107.2. SMT SHUBHA W/O SRI PRAKASH AGED ABOUT27YEARS R/AT No.192, GUDDAHATTI CHANADAPUR CIRCLE, ANEKAL TALUK BANGALORE URBAN - 562 107.3. SRI MANJUNATHA S/O LATE MUNIKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT25YEARS OCC:GARMENTS - 2 - MFA No.7404 of 2014 R/AT No.22, 3RD CROSS CHIKKABANASAVADI BANGALORE-560033 PREVIOUS ADDRESS GUDDAHATTI GATE NERALURU POST ANEKAL TQ BANGALORE URBAN - 562 107. APPELLANTS (By SRI. SURESH M LATHUR, ADVOCATE ) AND:1. . SRI SUYAMBULINGAM V. S/O SRI M VEERAPATHIRAM NADAR R/AT No.402, D BLOCK SRIRAM SWAGRUHA SAI GARDEN, VIDYARANAYAPURA BANGALORE -560 097. 2 . THE MANAGER HDFC...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.885 OF2019Sukhpal Singh Khaira .Appellant(s) Versus The State of Punjab . Respondent(s) WITH SLP (CRL.) No.6960/2021, CRL. APPEAL No.886/2019 & SLP (CRL.) No.5933/2019 JUDGMENT A.S. Bopanna, J.1. In the above appeal, the order dated 17.11.2017 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Revision No.4070 of 2017 and Criminal Revision No.4113 of 2017 are assailed. Through the said order, the High Court has dismissed the Criminal Revision Petitions and upheld the order dated 31.10.2017 passed by the Trial Page 1 of 45 Court summoning the appellant as an additional accused by exercising the power under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC for short). For the purpose of narration of facts the case in Criminal Appeal No.885 of 2019 is noted.2. The position which led to the appellant being summoned is that on 05.03.2015 a First Information Report was lodged in the Polic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH M.F.A. NO.1234/2014 (WC) C/W. M.F.A. NO.2414/2014 (WC) IN M.F.A. NO.1234/2014: BETWEEN: SRI HANUMANTHAPPA S/O. SHANKARAPPA JAKKAPPANAVAR, AGED ABOUT33YEARS, R/AT3D MAIN, 5TH CROSS, K.C.EXTENSION HARIHARA-577 601, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. APPELLANT (BY SRI V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., E-8, EDIP, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPUR, JAIPUR-302 003. RAJSTHAN REP. BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER. 2 . SRI PAYAZUDDIN S/O. M.K. SIRAJUDDIN BADAMKHAN, AGE: MAJOR, R/AT HORPETH, CHITRADURGA-577 501. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI O.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 [THROUGH VC].; NOTICE TO R2 DISPENSED WITH, VIDE ORDER DATED1510.2015) 2 THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION301) OF W.C. ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED198.2013 PASSED IN WCA.NO.Kaa Aa Daa/Kaa Na Pa/CR-45/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION, SUB-DIVISION,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH M.F.A. NO.1234/2014 (WC) C/W. M.F.A. NO.2414/2014 (WC) IN M.F.A. NO.1234/2014: BETWEEN: SRI HANUMANTHAPPA S/O. SHANKARAPPA JAKKAPPANAVAR, AGED ABOUT33YEARS, R/AT3D MAIN, 5TH CROSS, K.C.EXTENSION HARIHARA-577 601, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT. APPELLANT (BY SRI V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., E-8, EDIP, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPUR, JAIPUR-302 003. RAJSTHAN REP. BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER. 2 . SRI PAYAZUDDIN S/O. M.K. SIRAJUDDIN BADAMKHAN, AGE: MAJOR, R/AT HORPETH, CHITRADURGA-577 501. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI O.MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 [THROUGH VC].; NOTICE TO R2 DISPENSED WITH, VIDE ORDER DATED1510.2015) 2 THIS M.F.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION301) OF W.C. ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED198.2013 PASSED IN WCA.NO.Kaa Aa Daa/Kaa Na Pa/CR-45/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN COMPENSATION, SUB-DIVISION,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.11057 OF2019(GM RES) BETWEEN: HEALTHCARE GLOBAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT HCG TOWER, NO.8, P.KALINGA RAO ROAD, SAMPANGI RAMANAGAR, BENGALURU-27 REPRESENTED HEREIN ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MRS.IPSITA RAAJSHREE. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI DEEPAK BHASKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICALS MINISTRY OF CHEMICALS AND FERTILIZERS SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 110 001.2. THE NATIONAL PHARMACEUTICAL PRICING AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING ADDRESS AT3D /5TH FLOOR, YMCA CULTURAL CENTRE BUILDING, 2 1, JAISINGH ROAD, NEW DELHI 110 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI M.B.NARGUND, ADDL. SOLICITOR GENERAL FOR SRI GUTHAM DEV C. ULLAL, CGC) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASID...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA R.F.A.NO.2045/2011 (INJ) BETWEEN THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD BANGALORE-560 020. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI G.M.ANANDA, ADVOCATE) AND1. S VENKATARAMA REDDY S/O SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED42YEARS2. SMT VINUTHA M REDDY W/O SRI MADHUSUDANA REDDY AGED45YEARS BOTH RESIDING AT MAIN ROAD ALAHALLI, ANJANAPURA POST UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE-62 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI S.K.V.CHALAPATHY, SR. ADVOCATE A/W SMT. ANAGHA JAYAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE) 2 THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION96OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED10.08.2011 PASSED IN O.S.10158/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR THE PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR JUDGMENT ON2709.2022, COMING ON FOR 'PRONOUNCEMENT OF ORDER' THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOW...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8717 OF2022Sansera Engineering Limited Appellant Versus Deputy Commissioner, Large Tax Payer Unit, Bengaluru Respondent JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 23.07.2021 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Writ Appeal No.249/2020, whereby the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the appellant herein and has confirmed the common judgment and order dated 22.11.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petitions, upholding the order passed by the respondent rejecting the 1 claim of the appellant for rebate on the ground that the claim was barred by time/limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the original writ petitioner/appellant herein has preferred the present appeal.2. The facts leading to the p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - R RSA No.1035 OF2007IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE25h DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.1035 OF2007(DEC. & INJ.) BETWEEN SRI VENKATARAYA S NAYAK S/O SANNAPPA NAYAK, AGED ABOUT61YEARS R/AT NO.15 SHANTALA SANMARG NAGAR OPP KEC GOKUL ROAD, HUBLI-580030 DHARWAD DIST ...APPELLANT (BY SRI.S V SHASTRI & SRI. RAVI HEGDE & RAVINDRANATH K. ADVOCATE) AND D VIJAYGOPAL MALLYA S/O DIWAKAR AGED ABOUT36YEARS R/AT NO.201, HILLI VIEW APARTMENTS ADARSHANAGAR, HUBLI, DHARWAD DIST RESPONDENT (BY SRI.VIJAY KUMAR B. HORATTI, ADV. FOR RAVI G. SABHAHIT, ADVS.) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION100OF CPC PRAYING TO PASS THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN R.A.NO.126/2004 DATED1212.2006 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DVN.) HUBBALLI REVERSING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE IN O.S.NO.49/2001 DATED0707.2004 ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DVN.) HUBBALLI AND ALLOW THE APPEAL.-....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2773 OF2012PARIVAR SEVA SANSTHA ..... A PPELLANT VERSUS AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... R ESPONDENT W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.10694 OF2016JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.Section 1271 of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 (Bombay Act No.LIX of 1949)2, as applicable to the State of Gujarat, post the Gujarat Act No.2 of 20073, empowers a Municipal Corporation4 to impose property tax either under Section 1295 based on the rateable value of buildings and lands, or under 1 127. (1) For the purposes of this Act, the Corporation shall impose the following taxes, namely : (a)Property taxes either under section 129 or under section 141 AA; [* * * * * ]. 2 For short, GPMC Act. Originally, the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949. 3 The Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations (Gujarat Amendment and Validation) Act, 2007 4 Hereinafter referred as theCorporation. 5 129. For the pur...
Tag this Judgment!