Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.22378 OF2022(GM PASS) BETWEEN: S. NANCY NITHYA D/O. C. SUNDAR, W/O.K. SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT40YEARS, E-303, DSR GREENFIELDS, NAGONDANAHALLI, WHITEFIELD, BENGALURU 560 066. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD M.S., ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, 74 B, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110 001.2. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER8H BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU 560 095. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ADITYA SINGH, CGC FOR RESPONDENTS) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT/DIRECTION/ORDER DIRECTING THE R2ND RESPONDENT TO RENEW THE PASSPORT BEARING No.R604243 AS PER APPLICATION DATED0207.2022 BEARING APPLICATION REFERENCE No.(ARN) AS221007377104 PRODUCED AS AN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2290 OF2022(arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No.4629 of 2021) R. NAGENDER YADAV APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT J.B. Pardiwala, J.:1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is at the instance of the original accused and is directed against the order passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad dated 1st of June, 2021 in Criminal Petition No.4687 of 2020 by which the High Court declined to quash the criminal proceedings instituted against the appellant herein at the instance of the respondent No.2 (original complainant) and accordingly rejected the application filed by the appellant herein under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for quashing of the proceedings. 1 Factual Matrix 3. This litigation highlights one of the most perfunctory investigations at the hands of the police. The subject matter of this litigation is an open p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9322 OF2022[ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.32448 OF2018 Gohar Mohammed ...Appellant Versus Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation & others ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT J.K. Maheshwari, J.Leave granted.2. The instant appeal has been filed assailing the final order dated 06.09.2018 passed by the High Court of Allahabad in First Appeal from Order No.3303 of 2018, vide which the appeal preferred by the appellant against the award dated 04.05.2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short MACT) in MACP No.1107 of 2012 has been dismissed. MACT allowed the claim petition and 1 awarded a compensation of Rs. 31,90,000/ (Thirtyone lacs and ninety thousand only) in favour of respondent Nos. 6, 7 and 8 (legal representatives of deceased and hereinafter referred to as claimants) to be paid by respondent No.5 (Insurance Company), with further direction to recover the same from appel...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF DECEMBER2022PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA MFA No.103196 OF2018MV) BETWEEN SOMAPPA BALAPPA NANDI AGE:47. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND COOLIE, R/O: CHIKKANANDI, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI-591329. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI.BAHUBALI N. KANABARGI, ADVOCATE) AND1. MALLAPPA S/O HANAMANTAPPA PUJERI AGE:42. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: CHIKKANANDI, TQ: GOKAK,DIST: BELAGAVI-591329. 2 2 . THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., OPP: FOREST OFFICE, BUS STAND ROAD, GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI-591329. RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH) (SRI.RAJASHEKAR S. ARANI, ADV FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173 (1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED1212.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.2500/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XII ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND MEMBER, ADDITIONAL MACT, BELAGAVI, SITTING AT GOKAK PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITIN FOR COMPENSATI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA R.F.A. NO.298/2009 (PAR) BETWEEN: SMT. PADMAVATI W/O. LATE M.K. ANANTHASWAMY RESIDING AT NO.301/92, MALAKALA APARTMENTS, OPP. SRI RAM MANDIR, EAST PARK ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE-560003. DIED ON1211.2017 LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF DECEASED APPELLANT1a) SMT. VIJAYA W/O PANKAJ LAKUR D/O LATE PADMAVATHI AND M.K.ANANTHASWAMY, AGED ABOUT48YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.301/92, MALAKALA APARTMENT, OPP. TO SRI RAM MANDIR, EAST PARK ROAD, MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE-560003. AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER DATED0501.2018. APPELLANT (BY SRI M.R.RAJAGOPAL, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. V. RAVIPRAKASH, ADVOCATE) 2 AND:1. SMT. RAMAMANI W/O LATE M.K.RAMACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT71YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1262, 9TH MAIN ROAD, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, II STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE-560086. DIED ON1712.2012 1(a) AVINASH G. S/O RAMAMANI, AGED ABOUT25YEARS, R/AT NO.2820, 12TH MAIN 'D' BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR2D ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.19337 OF2022(GM RES) BETWEEN:1. . MS.C.UMA REDDY AGED ABOUT62YEARS D/O C.V.REDDY RESIDING AT NOS.31-36, II FLOOR1T MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE AREKERE MICO LAYOUT BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU 560 076. 2 . MR.SHIVAKUMAR REDDY AGED ABOUT59YEARS S/O C.VEERA REDDY RESIDING AT NO.14 RAMANASHREE29H MAIN ROAD BTM LAYOUT II STAGE BENGALURU 560 078. 3 . R.H.KASTURI AGED ABOUT54YEARS W/O C.SHIVAKUMAR REDDY RESIDING AT NO.14, RAMANASHREE29H MAIN ROAD BTM LAYOUT II STAGE BENGALURU 560 078. 2 4 . KAVVERI TELECOM PRODUCTS LIMITED REGISTERED AS PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REPRESENTED BY C.SHIVAKUMAR REDDY3136, I MAIN, II STAGE AREKERE MICO LAYOUT BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU 560 078. 5 . M/S KEONA PROPRIETARY CONCERN. REPRESENTED BY MS.C.UMA REDDY1T FLOOR, 31-36, 1 MAIN, 2ND STAGE AREKERE MICO LAYOUT BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU 560 078. 6 . M/S SMR TELECOM H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.8576 OF2021(GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. RIMA TRANSFORMERS AND CONDUCTORS PVT LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. DIWAKAR M. SHETTY, R/AT No.18, R.V. LAYOUT, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU 560 020. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI.ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR.ADVOCATE A/W SRI.MANJUNATH.K.V, ADVOCATE) AND: CANARA BANK REPRESENTED BY THE ASST. GENERAL MANAGER, SME PEENYA BRANCH, 6TH MAIN, PEENYA2D STAGE, BENGALURU 560 056. RESPONDENT (BY SRI.S.S.NAGANAND, SR.ADVOCATE A/W SRI.HEMANTH RAO, ADVOCATE) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED AUCTION OF E-AUCTION SCHEDULED ON2904.2021 PUBLISHED IN KANNADA DAILY KANNADA PRABHA DAILY DATED2703.2021 AT ANNEXURE-J AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON0811.2022, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, THE CO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.19756 OF2021(GM - RES) BETWEEN:1. . SRI.T.S NATARAJ S/O LATE C.SHIVAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT62YEARS, R/AT NO.9, PREETHI COTTAGE, 6TH MAIN ROAD, MAHALAKSHMI NAGAR, TUMAKURU 572 103. 2 . SRI HARSHA N., S/O T.S.NATARAJ, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, R/AT NO.9, PREETHI COTTAGE, 6TH MAIN ROAD, MAHALAKSHMI NAGAR, TUMAKURU 572 103. 3 . SMT.N.SEEMA S/O T.S.NATARAJ, AGED ABOUT31YEARS, R/AT NO.9, PREETHI COTTAGE, 6TH MAIN ROAD, MAHALAKSHMI NAGAR, TUMAKURU 572 103. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI ASHOK HARANAHALLI, SR.ADVOCATE A/W SRI VINAYAKA B., ADVOCATE) 2 AND:1. . STATE BANK OF INDIA STRESSED ASSETS RECOVERY BRANCH (05173) NO.11/90, 3RD FLOOR, NEAR OLD SHIVAJI THEATRE, JC ROAD, BENGALURU 560 002, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER. 2 . AUTHORIZED OFFICER STRESSED ASSETS RECOVERY BRANCH (05173) STATE BANK OF INDIA, NO.11/90, 3RD FLOOR, NEAR OLD SHIVAJI THEATRE, JC ROA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE12H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.15923 OF2022(GM - TEN) BETWEEN: SHAIK ABDUL KHALIQ S/O SHAIK ASGHAR PASHA, AGED ABOUT46YEARS, NO.27, COLES ROAD F STREET, CLEAVELAND TOWN, BENGALURU 560 005. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI MOHAMMED TAHIR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY COMMISSIONER, FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, NO.8, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU 52.2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT, RAMANGARA 562 159. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI DHYAN CHINNAPPA, AAG A/W SRI M.VINOD KUMAR, AGA) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO R-1 TO ISSUE WORK ORDER IN FAVOR OF PETITIONER AS THE PROCEEDING OF TENDER TASK FORCE SAMITI ORDER DTD.28.1.2022 ANNEXURE-B IN PURSUANT OF ANNEXURE-A E-TENDER BEARING NO.FSA.PROL/WHOLE SALE/TENDER/01/202...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9069 OF2022(arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.32347 of 2018) CHANDRAMMA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MANAGER, REGIONAL OFFICE, NCC LIMITED AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J.Leave Granted.2. The present appeal is directed against the final order dated 07.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburgi Bench (hereinafter referred to as High Court) in Miscellaneous First Appeal No.202250/2017 (WC) filed by the Appellant praying to call for the records and set aside the judgment and award dated 02.06.2017 passed by Additional Senior Civil Judge and Commissioner for Employees Compensation at Bidar (hereinafter referred to as Commissioner) in E.C.A No.12/2016. The High Court partly allowed the appeal of the Appellant and assessed the income as Rs.8000/- per month and accordingly computed the compensation at Rs. 2,19,512/-. 13. Briefly, the facts relevant for the purpose of this ...
Tag this Judgment!