Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC451REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.29 OF2021SHAJI POULOSE .. PETITIONER VERSUS INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.267 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.272 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.371 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.581 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.670 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1084 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1200 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1256 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1291 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1295 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1360 OF2021WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2022T.C. (Civil) No.29 of 2021 Etc. 1 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.186 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.833 OF2022TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.27 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.28 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.30 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.31 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.32 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.33 OF2021TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC447IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2668 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.9052 of 2021) NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY NEW DELHI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS OWAIS AMIN @ CHERRY & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT M. M. Sundresh, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu in Criminal Appeal (D) No.11/2020 dated 27.04.2021 by which the judgment rendered by the Special Judge, National Investigation Agency (NIA) (3rd Additional Sessions Judge) Jammu, has been confirmed in part, while remitting the issue pertaining to the charges framed under Sections 306 and 411 of the Jammu and Kashmir State Ranbir Penal Code SVT., 1989 (hereinafter referred to as RPC, 1989) along with Section 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as UAPA, 1967) for taking cognizance afresh. 13. Heard Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Addit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC448REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3924 OF2023SUNITA DEVI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 3926-3927 OF2023CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3925 OF2023JUDGMENT M. M. Sundresh, J.1. Criminal Appeal No.3924 of 2023 has been filed by the informant, against the order of remittal passed by the Division Bench of the Patna High Court directing the Trial Court to conduct a de novo trial, while making certain observations against the Special Judge, disapproving his approach in the conduct of the trial. Criminal Appeal Nos.3926-3927 of 2023 have been filed by the learned Special Judge who conducted the trial and thereafter 1 delivered the judgment. Criminal Appeal No.3925 of 2023 has been filed by the very same learned Judge, aggrieved over the remarks once again made by the High Court in an order of remittal, requesting the Honble Chief Justice of the Patna High Court to consider whethe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC439IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8978/2019 M/S SUNDEW PROPERTIES LIMITED APPELLANTS VERSUS TELANGANA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ANR. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.THE CHALLENGE1 This is a statutory appeal before us under section 125 of the Indian Electricity Act, 20031. It registers a challenge to the judgment and order dated 27th September, 2019 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity2 1 Electricity Act 2 APTEL Page 1 of 24 dismissing an appeal carried under section 111 of the Electricity Act by the appellant from the judgment and order dated 15th February, 2016 passed by the Telangana State Electricity Regulatory Commission3. Consequently, the impugned judgment and order of the TSERC was upheld. BRIEF FACTS2 The basic facts giving rise to this appeal are not disputed. A brief overview of the facts and the trajectory of proceedings, relevant for a decision on the present appeal, are set out...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC437[NON-REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO (S). 348 OF2021PRITI AGARWALLA AND OTHERS APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT S.V.N. BHATTI, J.I. FACTUAL MATRIX1 The Olympic Riding and Equestrian Academy, Eastern Jaunapur, New Delhi (for short, OREA), is a training facility for enthusiastic equestrian athletes. Mr. Kapil Nath Modi administers and runs the said training facility. Appellant Nos. 2, 3, 6 and Respondent No.2 were the trainee athletes in OREA. Appellant No.1 is the mother of Appellant No.2. Appellant Nos. 4 and 5 are the parents of Appellant No.6.2. Appellant No.2 was admitted for equestrian training into the Academy in June 2010. Appellant No.3 was accepted into OREA in the 1 year 2009. Appellant No.6 has also been receiving training in the Academy for a little over two years. Respondent No.2, a passionate athlete who dreamt of being the first Olympic champion of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC436IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) No.432 OF2023RAVIKUMAR DHANSUKHLAL MAHETA & ANR. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................... 3 i. Method of Promotion followed by the High Court of Gujarat ...................... 10 B. REFERENCE ORDER .............................................................................. 12 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS ...................... 14 D. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE HIGH COURT ....................... 16 E. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PROMOTED CANDIDATES .. 17 F. POINTS FOR DETERMINATION .......................................................... 20 G. ANALYSIS ..........................................................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC440IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 7315-7316 OF2021 CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF ODISHA ..... APPELLANT VERSUS BHARAT PROCESS & MECHANICAL ENGINEERS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) AND OTHERS ..... RESPONDENTS W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. ________ OF2024ARISING OUT OF DIARY No.1109 OF2024 JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.Permission to file the special leave petition by TPG Equity Management Private Limited, impugning the orders dated 09.03.2023 and 13.10.2023 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack, is granted. Delay in filing of the appeals is condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The appellant the Government of Odisha, has approached this Court against the judgment dated 03.03.2020 by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta, which upholds the directions given by the Company Judge, that the C...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC454REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.414 OF2023IN CIVIL APPEAL No.11857/2016 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ANOTHER APPLICANTS VERSUS M/S. K.L. RATHI STEELS LIMITED AND OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH MA No.808/2023 in C.A. No.12239/2016 R.P.(C) No.882/2017 in C.A. No.11846/2016 MA No.159/2018 in C.A. No.11857/2016 R.P.(C) No.396/2023 in C.A. No.11857/2016 R.P.(C) No.409/2023 in C.A. No.8511/2016 R.P.(C) No.410/2023 in C.A. No.8925/2016 R.P.(C) No.412/2023 in C.A. No.12114/2016 Page 1 of 90 R.P.(C) No.414/2023 in C.A. No.8898/2016 R.P.(C) No.416/2023 in C.A. No.4599/2016 R.P.(C) No.419/2023 in C.A. No.10206/2016 R.P.(C) No.418/2023 in C.A. No.8505/2016 R.P.(C) No.425/2023 in C.A. No.8929/2016 R.P.(C) No.428/2023 in C.A. No.8545/2016 R.P.(C) No.1731/2023 in C.A. No.9598/2016 R.P.(C) No.429/2023 in C.A. No.11256/2016 R.P.(C) No.431/2023 in C.A. No.9597/2016 R.P.(C) No.432/2023 i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC431IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1496 OF2023United India Insurance Co. Ltd. ...Appellant(s) Versus M/s Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. The appellant, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., an insurance company, challenges the decision by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter the NCDRC), which by its impugned order dated 16.01.2023 allowed the Consumer Complaint No.160 of 2019 and directed the appellant to release and pay an insurance claim of Rs. 39,09,92,828/-.2. Facts: The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), respondent No.3 herein, awarded a contract for the design, construction and maintenance of a cable-stayed bridge across the river Chambal on NH-76 at Kota, Rajasthan to a joint venture company comprising of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2. 1 The value of the project under the contract was Rs. 213,58,76,000/-. T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2024INSC429IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C) No.1025 of 2019 IN CIVIL APPEAL No.6567 OF2014LEHNA SINGH (D) BY LRS. . PETITIONER VERSUS GURNAM SINGH (D) BY LRS. & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.The petitioner has preferred this Review Petition seeking review of the Order dated 13.03.2019 passed in Civil Appeal No.6567 of 2014 wherein the present petitioner was the respondent. In the Order under review, the Civil Appeal was allowed, and the judgment and decree passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana on 27.11.2007 in Civil Regular 2 Second Appeal No.2191 of 1985 was set aside and the judgment and decree passed by the District Judge, Sangrur, on 06.06.1985 in Civil Appeal No.27 of 1983 has been restored.2. In the judgment under review, this Court held that the judgment and decree passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court is beyond the scope and ambit of Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 19081 on ...
Tag this Judgment!