Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2024INSC569CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.890/2023 RAKSHIT SHIVAM PRAKASH PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) ORDER1 Aspiring employment in the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), the petitioner applied and participated in the selection process of the Civil Services Examination 2014, which commenced with a notification by the UPSC on 31.05.2014. The petitioner qualified in Prelims, Mains and also the Interview. He was called to attend the medical examination, conducted by the Central Standing Medical Board on 29.04.2015. After the medical, he was declared to be temporarily unfit, due to his Body Mass Index (BMI) being 31.75, which is higher than the prescribed standard of 30 BMI. The petitioner duly applied for a re-medical test which was scheduled to take place on 14.07.2015. 12. On 04.07.2015, UPSC published the final result, and the petitioners name did not appear in the list. It is the petitioners case th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC572REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7874 OF2024THE STATE OF GUJARAT APPELLANT Vs. M/S. AMBUJA CEMENT LTD RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.7875 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL No.7877 OF2024CIVIL APPEAL No.7876 OF2024WITH T.C.(C) NOs. 12-13 OF2019 T.C.(C) No.14 OF2019 T.C.(C) No.15 OF2019& T.C.(C) NOs. 9- 11 OF2019JUDGMENT AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.1. The Appellant herein is the State of Gujarat which has challenged the judgment passed by Civil Appeal No.7874 of 2024, ETC. Page 1 of 23 the High Court of Gujarat dated 28.04.2016 in an appeal preferred by it which was dismissed affirming the order dated 08.06.2015 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), allowing the appeal of Respondent M/s Ambuja Cement, Ltd.2. The plea taken by the Appellant while challenging the judgments of the High Court and the Tribunal is that the Courts below have erred in holding that Value Added Tax and value of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2024 INSC562IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE / ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.2317 of 2011 The State of Punjab & Ors. Appellants Versus Davinder Singh & Ors. Respondents With C.A. No.6936 of 2015 With C.A. No.5597 of 2010 With W.P.(C) No.21 of 2023 With C.A. No.5593 of 2010 With S.L.P.(C) No.30766 of 2010 With S.L.P.(C) No.8701 of 2011 With S.L.P.(C) Nos.36500-36501 of 2011 With T.C.(C) No.38 of 2011 1 With T.P.(C) No.464 of 2015 With W.P.(C) No.1477 of 2019 With C.A. No.5586 of 2010 With C.A. No.5598 of 2010 With C.A. Nos. 5595-5596 of 2010 With C.A. No.2324 of 2011 With T.C.(C) No.37 of 2011 With C.A. No.5589 of 2010 With C.A. No.5600 of 2010 With C.A. No.5587 of 2010 With S.L.P.(C) Nos.5454-5459 of 2011 With C.A. No.2318 of 2011 With C.A. No.289 of 2014 And With W.P.(C) No.562 of 2022 2 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI A. Background ................................................................................................ 5 i. Relevant c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2024 INSC558IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No.352 of 2023 Gaurav Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India and Ors. Respondents With T.C.(C) No.28 of 2023 With T.C.(C) No.29 of 2023 With T.C.(C) No.30 of 2023 With T.P.(C) No.2526 of 2023 With T.P.(C) No.1982 of 2023 With T.P.(C) Nos. 2088-2089 of 2023 With T.P.(C) No.2171 of 2023 With T.P.(C) No.2123 of 2023 And With T.P.(C) No.2734 of 2023 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Background .......................................................................................................... 4 B. Issues .................................................................................................................... 8 C. Submissions ........................................................................................................ 8 D. Legal background .............................................................................................. 13...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.894 OF2020UP ROADWAYS RETIRED OFFICIALS AND OFFICERS ASSOCIATION . APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS WITH C.A. No.896/2020 , C.A. No.898/2020 , C.A. No.957/2020 , C.A. Nos. 959-965/2020 , C.A. No.897/2020 , C.A. No.895/2020 , C.A. Nos. 899-901/2020 , C.A. No.910/2020 , C.A. No.902/2020 , C.A. No.912/2020 , C.A. No.909/2020 , C.A. No.913/2020 , C.A. No.958/2020 , C.A. No.915/2020 , C.A. No.966/2020 , C.A. No.914/2020 , C.A. No.832/2020 , C.A. No.967/2020 , C.A. No.905/2020 , C.A. No.907/2020 , C.A. No.903/2020 , C.A. No.911/2020 , C.A. No.904/2020 , C.A. No.906/2020 , C.A. No.908/2020 & C.A. No.(s) /2024 @ SLP (c) /2024 @ Diary No.10240/2020 JUDGMENT PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.Delay condoned in filing SLP(C) Diary No.10240 of 2020 and leave granted. 22. Abatement is set aside and applications for substitution are allowed. Application(s) for intervention is allowed.3. By this common j...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2024 INSC554IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 4056-4064 of 1999 Mineral Area Development Authority & Anr. Appellants Versus M/S Steel Authority of India & Anr Etc. Respondents With Civil Appeal No.7937 of 2019 With Writ Petition (Civil) No.512 of 2018 With Civil Appeal No.7938 of 2019 With Civil Appeal No.7936 of 2019 With Civil Appeal No.6221 of 2008 With Civil Appeal No.5250 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.729 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1029 of 2019 With Special Leave Petition (C) No.16028 of 2021 With Civil Appeal No.4286 of 2023 1 With Civil Appeal No.5682 of 2007 With Civil Appeal No.1295 of 2008 With Civil Appeal No.874 of 2013 With Civil Appeal Nos. 8269-8271 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8268 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8267 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.6135 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.8272 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.9458 of 2013 With Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.18600 of 2013 With Civil Appeal No.4...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC545REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE/INHERENT JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.115 OF2004GENE CAMPAIGN & ANOTHER PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.260 of 2005 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.840 OF2016CIVIL APPEAL NO.4086 OF2006CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.295 OF2007IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.260 of 2005 CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.6 OF2016IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.260 of 2005 Writ Petition (Civil) No.115 of 2004 Etc. Page 1 of 260 JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA, J Table of Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ 4 Preface: ................................................................................................................................ 7 Birds eye view of the controversy: ............................................................................. 9 Pleadings: ............................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC542Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.8176 of 2022 Kaushik Narsinhbhai Patel & Ors. . Appellant(s) Versus M/s. S.J.R. Prime Corporation Private Limited. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. The appellants, 46 in numbers, along with respondent Nos.2 to 6 herein (proforma respondents) filed Consumer Case No.945 of 2019, against Respondent No.1 herein, complaining of deficiency in service raising various grounds, which culminated in the impugned order dated 15.09.2022 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), New Delhi. Allured by the representation of the first respondent-builder, each of the appellants booked separate flats in its declared project namely, Fiesta Homes by SJR Prime. A Construction Agreement dated Page 1 of 27 Civil Appeal No.8176 of 2022 31.03.2012 was entered into between the complainant and Respondent No.1 (Annexure P-2). Going by Clause 6.1 of the Construction Agreement, possessio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC544IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. ___________ OF2024[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS. 19647-48 OF2022 S. TIRUPATHI RAO APPELLANT VERSUS M. LINGAMAIAH & ORS RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. ___________ OF2024[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS. 19748-19749 OF2022 JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.CIVIL APPEAL NOS. ___________ OF2024[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS. 19647-48 OF2022 Leave granted.2. These appeals assail the common judgment and order dated 27th April, 20221 of the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad2 allowing 1 impugned order, hereafter 2 High Court, hereafter 1 Review I.A. No.1/2020 in LPA12018 and Review I.A. No.3/2020 in CA3320173 preferred by the first respondent. The impugned order of the High Court recalled the order under review and dismissed a contempt appeal as well as a letters patent appeal of the appellant.3. The present dispute emerges from a complex and interwoven set of legal proceedings, i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC539REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8985 OF2013M/S REWA TOLLWAY P. LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.8989 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8986 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8990 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8988 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8987 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8991 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8992 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8993 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8995 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8996 OF2013CIVIL APPEAL NO.8994 OF20131 JUDGMENT VIKRAM NATH, J.1. By the impugned judgment and order dated 11.02.2010, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur decided a group of twelve petitions wherein the question involved was whether a transaction where the right to collect tolls is given in lieu of the amount spent by the Concessionaire in the construction of roads, bridges etc. under the Build, Operate & Transfer (BOT) Scheme amounts to a lease as contemplated under Section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act, 18821 ...
Tag this Judgment!