Saw - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: saw Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 978 results (0.14 seconds)Jayaram Saw Mill Vs. the District Forest Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2012
..... of wood based industries rules 2010 if the individual industries viz saw mills have made an application and if such application is in ..... been returned for certain defects it is open to the individual saw mills veneers plywood industries to resubmit the applications in proper format ..... in all these cases petitioners have no licence to run the saw mills as on date insofar as the first two cases are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaju Saw Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
..... high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no 33600 of 2010 raju saw son of late vasudeo saw resident of chandmari road dhanbad p s dhansar district dhanbad jharkhand petitioner versus .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuresh Saw @ Suresh Sah Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no 3460 of 2012 suresh saw suresh sah versus the state of bihar for the petitioner mr sunil kumar adv for ..... criminal antecedents taking into account the allegation in consonance with period of detention petitioner suresh saw suresh sah is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew Bharath Saw Mill. Vs. the District Forest Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-27-2012
..... in service connection in 051 002 1359 and other amenities for running the petitioner s saw mill until the disposal of the petitioner s application dated 2 1 2012 for transfer ..... in service connection in 051 002 1359 and other amenities for running the petitioner s saw mill until the disposal of the petitioner s application dated 2 1 2012 for transfer .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManikant Saw Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
..... in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no 1066 of 2012 manikant saw petitioner versus the state of bihar opposite party coram honourable mr justice dinesh kumar singh .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmbedkar Saw Sahayta Samhoo Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2012
w p no 8165 2012 ambedkar saw sahayata samooh vs state of m p ors 24 09 2012 shri r singh learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPakkirisamy Yadav Saw Mill. Vs. the Additional Principal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
..... not in prescribed format further in the application petitioner prays permission to set up new saw mill hence petitioner is directed to submit prescribed application to the second respondent immediately 5 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElumalaiyan Saw Mill. Vs. the Additional Principal and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2012
and till such time the petitioner should not run the sawmill in view of the above said position the petitioner is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs.R.S.Timber and Saw Mill. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-27-2012
both writ petitions are filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of mandamus directing...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGyatri Mahila Saw-sahayta Samhoo Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2012
1 w p no 8884 2012 gayatri mahila swa sahayta samuh anr versus state of m p ors 10 09...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial