Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 91 place of trial etc Page 97 of about 6,505 results (0.275 seconds)

May 14 2014 (HC)

Tek Chand and Others Vs. Bir Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... not got the entries signed by any officer as per provisions of rule 11 of the rules framed by the high court under section 46-a of the punjab courts act and as incorporated in chapter 17 part-b, volume 1 of the high court rules and orders.it has been admitted by witnesses that close to the place where the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2014 (HC)

Condor Maritime Dienstleistung Gmbh and Co. Kg and Another Vs. M.V. We ...

Court : Mumbai

..... the veil has been lifted. in exceptional cases where courts have felt "themselves able to ignore the corporate entity and to treat the individual shareholders as liable for its acts",(2) the same course has been adopted. summarising his conclusions, gower has classified seven categories of cases where the veil of a corporate body has been lifted. ..... not mentioning who the actual owners are. mr. ramabhadran states that the documents at exh.c to the plaint suggests otherwise and under section 106 of the evidence act, the onus is on the applicant/defendant no.2 to show as to who is the owner and simplicitor denial is not sufficient. likewise, he further submitted, ..... in respect of which services were rendered by the plaintiff, has been beached and has been sold for demolition. 1(g) at all material times, the defendants have acted and/or corresponded through their agent gms, dubai (gms?). a large part of the correspondence has been carried on by the defendants through gms. 10. in paragraph 24 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2014 (TRI)

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Siddique Rizwani

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... respondent/complainant violated the terms and conditions of the insurance policy and the learned district forum has ironed this fact that the respondent/complainant himself is liable for his negligent act and therefore, the impugned order passed by the district forum suffers from irregularity and illegality and is liable to be set aside. 7. none appeared before us for the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2014 (TRI)

Ranjana Jetley and Others Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Environment ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... it is quite clear that for the project in question ec is not required under the eia notification 2006. also no forest clearance is required under the forest conservation act, 1980. the project is also far away from sultanpur bird sanctuary (about 20 km) and the provision of aravalli notification brought by moef are also not attracted as ..... 236 trees with certain conditions. the forest department also granted permission on 4/4/2012 for felling of 1055 trees under section 4 of the punjab land preservation act, 1900 with a condition that 10 times of the trees felled be planted at owners cost and preferably on owners land which will be monitored by the forest department ..... of the applicants is that there will be significant air and noise pollution problems due to movement of traffic in the area due to cutting of trees which were acting as a buffer and reducing noise and dust pollution. incidentally, an email was received by ngt from haryali welfare society addressed to the hon'ble chief minister .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2014 (HC)

Sisir Banerjee Vs. Shrimati Sujata Sengupta

Court : Kolkata

..... the propounder or the applicant, as the case may be, was successful in proving the execution of the said will. under section 63 of the indian succession act, every testator shall execute his will according to the rules that would, inter alia, provide, he has to sign or affix his mark to the will ..... stage and two brothers were allowed to contest the probate proceeding. since the executor subsequently declined to act any further, the proceeding was converted into an application for letters of administration to the legatee smt.sujata sengupta. subsequently, the proceeding was converted into a contentious ..... . she bequeathed her property and all her assets to her sister smt.sujata sengupta. she made sadhan ranjan banerjee as the executor who subsequently declined to act. out of three brothers.two subsequently came to this court and prayed for condonation of delay in lodging the caveat. such application was allowed at the appellate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2014 (HC)

Present: - Mr. Rajesh Bansal Advocate Vs. Registrar Punjab and Haryana ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... by contending that there is no provision in the rules for giving marks in testing the proficiency in operation of computer. it was stated that despite an application submitted under rti act, 2005 seeking information of documents relating to selection and appointment of 73 clerks, the said information was not supplied and hence, the petition had been filed without impleading all the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2014 (HC)

Present : Mr.Surender Lamba Advocate for the Petitioners. Vs. Rajender ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... plan sanctioned as per the zoning plan. suffice it to observe that if such permissions are required and the petitioners apply for the same, the competent authorities are directed to act promptly and in accordance with law. an appropriate decision shall be taken within a period of three months from the date the permission is applied/approval sought. the writ petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2014 (HC)

Present : Mr.L.N.Verma Advocate for the Petitioner. Vs. Smt.Asha Rana ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... by the special judge, chandigarh in a criminal case arising out of fir no.15 dated 06.08.1990 registered against col. b.s.guraya under the prevention of corruption act, 1988. vide the above-stated interim order, the special judge, chandigarh, directed the estate officer, huda, gurgaon, not to allow the transfer/to sell/alienate the plot in question till .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj Advocate Vs. State of U.T. and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... -m-15137-2014 3 he further states that all the terms and conditions of the compromise have already been materialized; a petition under section 13-b of the hindu marriage act, 1955, for grant of a decree of divorce, has already been presented before the learned district judge, chandigarh, in which first motion has already been issued and the case is ..... to the accuracy of this order. crm-m-15137-2014 4 respondent no.2. as a consequence of the compromise, a petition under section 13-b of the hindu marriage act, 1955, for grant of a decree of divorce had been presented before the learned district judge, chandigarh, in which first motion has already been issued and the case is fixed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2014 (HC)

Present : Mr.Kanwaljit Singh Senior Advocate with Vs. M/S Anaesthetic ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... gone through the record. keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already approached the competent authority, namely, union of india to accord necessary permission under the forest (conservation) act, 1980, we dispose of this writ petition without expressing any views on merits, with a direction to the firs.respondent to take appropriate decision in accordance with law as early .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //