Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 91 place of trial etc Page 92 of about 6,505 results (0.597 seconds)

Aug 05 2013 (HC)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana Vs. in the High Court of Punja ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and substantial justice for which alone the court exists. it needs little emphasis that the inherent jurisdiction does not confer an arbitrary power on the high court to act according to whim or caprice. the power exists to prevent abuse of authority and not to produce injustice. 9. after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, ..... ground for proceeding against the accused. (vi) where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the code or the concerned act (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the code or the ..... concerned act, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party. vii)where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with mala fide and/or where the proceeding is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Arvind Kashyap Advocate Vs. Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Bawa

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... unnecessary details, the facts relevant for disposal of the present petition are to the effect that the respondent-petitioner filed petition under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 ( in short the act .) against the petitioner-respondent. it is averred in the petition that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 15.01.1995 according to sikh rites and ceremonies .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2012 (HC)

Cwp No. 6729 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Cwp No. 6729 of 2012 (Oandm)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... are held by general public and balance is owned by financial institutions. the board of directors of the company has been constituted in terms of the provisions of the act, applicable for any public limited company. at present, out of nine directors, three have been nominated by psidc, two by lending institutions and four by the share ..... the psidc in the year 1983. however, later on its holding was reduced. the land for the company was acquired in terms of provisions of the land acquisition act, 1894. the voluntary retirement scheme was prepared by the government for employees of public sector undertakings and copy thereof was merely forwarded to the company for its guidance. ..... stretch of imagination the company can be termed as a state or any other authority amenable to writ jurisdiction. the company is duly incorporated under the companies act, 1956 (for short, 'the act'). only 44.26% of its shares are held by psidc, 37.35% are held by general public and some part is owned by the financial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2013 (HC)

Present : Sarv Shri Shailendra JaIn Anil Kshetarpal M.L.Sharma, Vs. St ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , legal, reasonable, constitutional, un- arbitrary, indiscrimination, based on uniform approach, principle of natural justice, equity, law and provisions contained in the said act .[11].respondent no.2 in his written statement also claims:- that the government has also framed a policy for rehabilitation and resettlement of land owners.land acquisition ..... , all development undertaken by the state agencies or the private sector colonizers have to be in conformity with the development plans prepared under the act of 1963. the state government agencies like huda and haryana state industrial and infrastructure development corporation (hsiidc) undertake development in a similar way as ..... that by colonizers which are granted license under the act of 1975. thus, the act of 1975 and huda act, 1977, along with the incorporation of hsiidc together provide for a platform for urban development in haryana, in a healthy .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 2013 (HC)

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. the St ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... requests made to the respondent-authorities. the petitioner is said to have made a complaint to gmada, who is obligated to monitor the activities of a licensee under the 1995 act. it appears from the communications dated 16.8.2012 and 19.9.2012 (annexure p-7) that gmada took cognizance of the complaint received from the petitioner, sent it for ..... real estate developer-companies to whom license has been granted by the state of punjab/its statutory authority under the provisions of the punjab apartment and property regulation act, 1995 (for short, 'the 1995 act').residential plot measuring 250 square yards bearing no.1228 in sector 117, sas nagar cwp no11101 of 2013 [2].mohali was allotted to the petitioner vide allotment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2012 (HC)

Lalit Kumar Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... year 1994. despite requests, possession of the plot in dispute has not been delivered to the petitioner. to say so, reference was made to information received under right to information act, 2005 on 7.6.2012 (annexure p5).it is stated that the plot in dispute comes under existing civil writ petition no.23304 o 2. industries and its possession is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Gautam Diwan Advocate Vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the portion of firs.and second floor has been ordered to be demolished on the ground of certain violations of rule 5 of the capital of punjab (development and regulation).act, 1952. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main grievance of the petitioner is that before passing the order dated 14.05.2012, the petitioner was not given any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2013 (HC)

Kanwal Kishore Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the year 1991-92, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as annexure p1. vide notification dated 30.3.1990 issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894, part of the aforesaid land was acquired for development of residential and commercial area, whereas the remaining part of the aforesaid land was acquired vide award dated 18.12 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2013 (HC)

Bharat Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the year 1991-92, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as annexure p1. vide notification dated 30.3.1990 issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894, part of the aforesaid land was acquired for development of residential and commercial area, whereas the remaining part of the aforesaid land was acquired vide award dated 21.12 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2013 (HC)

Sunil Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the year 1991-92, copy of which has been annexed with the petition as annexure p1. vide notification dated 30.3.1990 issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894, part of the aforesaid land was acquired for development of residential and commercial area, whereas the remaining part of the aforesaid land was acquired vide award dated 18.12 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //