Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 55 punishments otherwise than by force court Court: delhi Page 8 of about 704 results (0.260 seconds)

Aug 12 2014 (HC)

Mohd. Umar and anr. Vs. Mohd. Islam and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... 13.08.1993 in favour of the petitioners, the petitioners have become the title holder of the tenanted premises to file the petition u/s 14(1)(e) of drc act. it has been held by the hon ble high court of delhi in rajender kumar sharma & ors. vs. leela wati & ors., 155 (2008) dlt383that in a rent petition ..... decreed the eviction petition for bonafide necessity under section 14(1)(e) of the act with respect to the tenanted premises comprising of one room dalan on the ground floor along with a tin shed and one tin shed in the first floor of property ..... reporter or not?. valmiki j.mehta, j (oral) 1. this rent control revision petition is filed under section 25b(8) of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the act ) impugning the judgment dated 05.9.2012 by which the additional rent controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners/tenants and has .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2017 (HC)

State vs.sunil

Court : Delhi

..... bureau of investigation held that in case where minimum sentence is prescribed by the statute, the convict cannot be granted the relief under the probation of offenders act. the impugned order on sentence dated 7th march, 2015 is thus liable to be set aside. considering the mitigating factors noted by the learned additional sessions judge ..... a period of one year.2. aggrieved by the order dated 7th march, 2015 releasing sunil on probation for offence punishable under section 8 of the pocso act which provides for a mandatory minimum sentence of three years imprisonment, the state preferred crl.a. 1232/2015. in the said appeal despite issuance of repeated notices ..... ms. justice mukta gupta nishu, ps aman vihar.1. sunil was convicted for offence punishable under section 8 of the protection of children from sexual offences act (in short pocso act ) vide judgment dated 25th february, 2015 and vide order on sentence dated 7th march, 2015, sunil was released by giving benefit of probation on his .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2017 (HC)

Sunil vs.state (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... bureau of investigation held that in case where minimum sentence is prescribed by the statute, the convict cannot be granted the relief under the probation of offenders act. the impugned order on sentence dated 7th march, 2015 is thus liable to be set aside. considering the mitigating factors noted by the learned additional sessions judge ..... a period of one year.2. aggrieved by the order dated 7th march, 2015 releasing sunil on probation for offence punishable under section 8 of the pocso act which provides for a mandatory minimum sentence of three years imprisonment, the state preferred crl.a. 1232/2015. in the said appeal despite issuance of repeated notices ..... ms. justice mukta gupta nishu, ps aman vihar.1. sunil was convicted for offence punishable under section 8 of the protection of children from sexual offences act (in short pocso act ) vide judgment dated 25th february, 2015 and vide order on sentence dated 7th march, 2015, sunil was released by giving benefit of probation on his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2018 (HC)

Vijendra Singh Jafa vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... sections 467, 468, 471 and 120-b can by no stretch of imagination by their very nature be regarded as having been committed by any public servant while acting or purporting to act in discharge of official duty. in such cases, official status only provides an opportunity for commission of the offence. 12 the apex court in the judgment of ..... which had been quashed by the apex court in the judgment of vineet narain (supra) on 18.12.1997. section 6-a of the delhi special police establishment act which was a follow up of this single directive and the question whether this immunity which was afforded in terms of section 6-a also (now quashed) would have ..... vs. dr. manmohan singh and anr. the question whether this single directive which was followed by the enactment of section 6-a of the delhi special police establishment act would have a retrospective effect or a prospective effect is a question even otherwise which is now posed before the apex court and the apex court has referred the matter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2018 (HC)

Icici Bank Ltd. Vs.shishupal Singh

Court : Delhi

..... in a court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the cause of action, wholly or in part arises. it may be remembered that earlier section 7 of act of 1888 added explanation iii as under:"explanation iii--in suits arising out of contract the cause of action arises within the meaning of this section at any of ..... at new delhi hence the tribunal at delhi shall has exclusive jurisdiction. thus this hon ble tribunal w.p.(c) no.5060/2018 page 3 of 16 under the act and the rules has the territorial jurisdiction to try and entertain the present application. when such a stand has been taken, which is supported by a verification of ..... by the petitioner vide para 3 which relates to jurisdiction of the tribunal at page 66 of the paper book reads as under: this tribunal has the jurisdiction under the act, since, the applicant bank is situated at videocon tower, jhandewalan extension, new delhi-110055, the loan documents were executed at videocon tower, jhandewalan extension, new delhi-110055, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 2015 (HC)

Manoj Kumar Agarwal Vs. C B I and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... cbi in a state (other than union territory or railway area), consent of the state government is necessary. in other words, before the provisions of the delhi act are invoked to exercise power and jurisdiction by special police establishment in any state, the following conditions must be fulfilled; (i) a notification must be issued by ..... the said establishment only with the consent of the state government concerned.36. having noticed the scope and amplitude of sections 5 and 6 of the special police act, the question for consideration is whether the restriction imposed on the powers of the central government would apply mutatis mutandis to the constitutional courts as well. as ..... government/dopt that has full competence to grant sanction for the entire check period. it has further been argued that consent under section 3 of the dspe act, 1946 has been given by the central government thereby giving cbi full jurisdiction to investigate into the matter.10. i have heard counsel for the parties, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 27 1976 (HC)

Kewal Krishan Mayor Vs. Kailash Chand Mayor and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi97

..... in paragraph 2 of ext.pw-3/1. an assessment order was made by the income-tax officer for the assessmentyear 1963-64, for the assessment of l. bal mukand under the gifttax act, but the date of the assessment order is not given. theassessment order, ext. pw-1/2, states that shri r. c. sood hasattended on behalf of ..... -acquired property as the familyproperty. the legal concept of blending is embodied in the idea thatthere should be a conscious act of throwing the property into thejoint stock. the question is whether ext. pw-3/1 indicates thatl. bal mukand intended to throw the said two properties in the common stock and not to claim at any stage separate title ..... thereof. thereal intention behind the act of executing ext. pw-3/1 has to begathered. in my opinion, a clear intention of l. bal mukand to waivethe separate and exclusive right has been brought out in the declaration.the declaration of the intention of l .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1982 (HC)

Premchand Gupta Vs. Moolchand and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 22(1982)DLT3; 1983RLR522

..... performed by him.(2) she died on 24-10-1962. gupta applied for letters of administration on 29-1-1963 under section 278 of the indian succession act, 1925. the will was challenged by bal kishan dass, jai kishan dass, radhey sham and shayam sunder lal, sons of one kesho ram, on the one hand by objections filed on 8- ..... are not justified. a will has to be proved like any other document except as to the special requirements of attestation prescribed by section 63 of the indian succession act. ordinarily, when the evidence adduced in support of the will is disinterested, satisfactory and sufficient to prove the sound and disposing state of the testator's mind and ..... any one except mahant kanhai ram.(3) the learned district judge by his order dated 9-12-1963 allowed the prayer for grant of letters of administration to gupta. bal kishan and others did not file any appeal but instead opened another front and filed a civil suit no. 624164 for declaration that the will was forged, fictitious, illegal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1990 (TRI)

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1991)LC630Tri(Delhi)

..... . for these reasons, i am inclined to hold that the exemption under the main notification covered the auxiliary duty of excise leviable under section 36 of the finance act, 1976." therefore, it cannot be doubted that the government of india did not intend to give benefit to spindle hvi oil used for manufacture of agricultural spray oil ..... appears in the judgment of the privy council in crawford v. spooner - (1846) 6 moo pc 1(9): "...we cannot aid the legislature's defective phrasing of the act, we cannot add, and mend, and, by construction, make up deficiencies which are left there." learned counsel for the respondents is possibly right in his submission that the ..... question as the notifications specifically mentioned mineral oil commonly known as spindle hvi oil falling under item 11(a) of the first schedule of the central excises and salt act, 1944. however, the appellants have submitted that notification no. 44/71-c.e, dated 7-4-1971 exempts any mineral oil falling under item no. 8 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 31 2005 (TRI)

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Royal Jordanians Airlines

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)283ITR28(Delhi)

..... from local courts in all circumstances except those specified in other provisions of the convention. those circumstances include most of those which would be regarded as acts jure gestionis, as well as certain others, such as waiver of immunity, which are generally admitted to permit proceedings against a foreign state." the learned ..... of lords and now "restrictive" doctrine of immunity applied, both to actions in rem and in personam.these common law developments were embodied in the state immunity act, 1978 in england. "commercial transaction" was defined and it extended to "any other transaction or activity (whether of a commercial, industrial, financial, professional or ..... representative argued at considerable length that there is considerable shift in the approach over the course of years and trend now is to draw distinction between the acts of a state in its sovereign capacity (acta jure imperil) and those of a private law or commercial character (acta jure gestionis). the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //