Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 55 punishments otherwise than by force court Court: delhi Page 10 of about 704 results (0.155 seconds)

P J vs.r J

Court : Delhi

..... appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 08.03.2018 passed by the family court on an application filed by the respondent/wife under section 26 of the hindu marriage act seeking maintenance for the son, who is a child with special needs. the family court has awarded a sum of rs.5,000/- per month to be paid to the .....

B.R. Malhotra Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)1049; 71(1998)DLT498; 1998(44)DRJ337

..... respondent and of the hospital authorities, the petitioner suffered financial loss to the tune of rs.36,924.00 . petitioner rightly contended that filling of form was only a ministerial act on which he had no control. merely, because the medical proceedings were sent on a wrong form filled by the hospital authorities, the petitioner cannot be made to suffer monetary .....

G. K. Sood vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... appointed the petitioner as whole-time director on the board of nddb in violation of the provisions of section 8(3) and section 19 of the national dairy development board act.6. mr. sandeep sethi, ld. asg has placed the statutory provisions before us which read as follows:-" 8(3) the chairman and the director referred to in clause ..... board has not been included in the list of public sector enterprises. ld. asg points out that the nddb has been constituted under the provisions of national dairy development act, 1987 and is a statutory body. it is submitted that the office memorandum therefore, clearly has no application to the board of nddb and the challenge premised thereon ..... sr. adv. with mr. ajit warrier, mr. aditya nayyar and mr. varun, advs. for r-2&3. coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice c.hari shankar judgment (oral) gita mittal, acting chief justice w.p.(c) 5433/2018 1. this writ petition challenges the appointment of respondent no.3 as a whole-time director on .....

Rakhi vs.babu Lal and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... purchase consideration therefor and having purchased the property in the name of the respondent no.1/plaintiff/decree holder, was barred by the benami transactions (prohibition) act, 1988 now renamed prohibition of benami property transactions act, 1988.12. the counsel for the appellant/objector on enquiry as to what is wrong with the aforesaid reasoning, states that the benami law does not .....

Ancl & Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.punj Lloyd Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... of the arguments and the passing of the award. taking note of this stand, the arbitral tribunal is of the view that no purpose would be served by continuing to act as the sole arbitrator as it would be extremely difficult and stressful to complete the proceedings and also pass the award with just 16 days left from today. the parties .....

Navin Soi vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... . date of decision:14. h february, 2019 coram: hon'ble mr. justice manmohan judgment manmohan, j: (oral) 1. present petition has been filed under section 276 of the indian succession act, 1925, for grant of probate of will dated 11th march, 2010, executed by late mrs. pushpa kumari soi.2. in the petition it has been averred that the petitioner is .....

Killick Slotted Angels Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1988)(17)LC42Tri(Delhi)

..... sales effected under the agreement were not at arm's length.9. here it would be relevant to re-produce section 4(4)(c) of the central excises and salt act, 1944 which came into force from 1-10-1975 :- "(c) 'related persons' means a person who is so associated with the assessee that they have interest, directly or indirectly, in .....

Harish Textile Engineerings Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)LC163Tri(Delhi)

..... marketability, the collector of central excise in the order-in-original dated 12-3-1993 held that the goods in question find mention in the schedule of central excise tariff act, hence are marketable.moti laminates pvt. ltd. v. collector of central excise, ahmedabad, reported in 1995 (76) e.l.t.241 (s.c.) held that the goods mentioned in the .....

Greenpeace India Society Thr. Its Executive Direct Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

..... 17.07.2014, the petitioner, made a representation to the ministry of home affairs. in this representation, the petitioner pointed out that it stood registered under the foreign contribution (regulations) act, 2010 (in short fcra), and that, its registration was in place since september, 2005. the registration number accorded to the petitioner was also quoted in the representation. 4.1 the .....

Indu Bansal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... :28. 11.2017 coram: hon'ble mr. justice jayant nath jayant nath, j.(oral) the petitioner filed this present petition under section 278 and 300 of 1. the indian succession act for grant of letter of administration with respect to the assets left behind by her deceased brother late shri inderjeet gupta (hereinafter referred to as the deceased ).2. brief facts .....