Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 40 offences relating to force court Court: chennai Page 11 of about 437 results (0.144 seconds)

Mar 31 2004 (HC)

K. Mohamed Muthu and ors. Vs. Mrs. Habeeba Beebi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(2)CTC721; (2004)3MLJ84

..... points on merits, we are inclined to deal with the law on the issue regarding gift under muslim law. in view of section 129 of transfer of property act, no provision under the act is made applicable to gift by a muslim and only muslim law alone is applicable. as stated by the hon'ble mr. justice hidayathullah, in the book mulla ..... not sell the property to any one but the members of the transferor's and transferee's family (w), but void if the restraint is absolute. see transfer of property act, section 10.(d) a makes a gift of certain property to b. it is provided by the deed of gift that b shall not transfer the property. the restraint against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 08 1991 (HC)

India Forge and Drop Stampings Employees Union, Represented by Its Gen ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ157

..... of securing compliance with the order of this court. as found by the learned single judge, there is scope for the workmen to resort to the process under the act. on the facts and circumstances of the case, we have also not found a warrant to straightaway sequester the properties of the respondents. in view of our analysis of ..... been a party. since there was non-compliance with the orders with regard to payment of the full wages as per section 17-b of the act, the workmen filed contempt application no. 158 of 1990 against the management. the learned single judge of this court in that contempt application found the management guilty of contempt ..... management, the learned single judge of this court directed payment to the workmen full wages last drawn by them under section 17-b of the industrial disputes act, 1947, hereinafter referred to as the act. the order of the learned single judge has been confirmed by a bench of this court, to which one of us (nainar sundaram, j.) had .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 2008 (HC)

V. Kannappan and 19 ors. and ors. Vs. Additional Secretary, Ministry o ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)2MLJ438

..... this court has dismissed all the writ petitions. those writ petitions arise out of transfers which is incidental to service conditions of employees governed by industrial disputes act which have to be adjudicated by fora created by statute and therefore, first bench of this court has held that those writ petitions are not maintainable.25 ..... contended that payment of pension is a 'public function' amounting to discharge of public duty and therefore, when there is violation of that public duty by arbitrary act of the bank, writ of mandamus can be issued even against the private body. learned senior counsel would further submit that when private body performs such statutory ..... petitions are not maintainable, since writ petition will not lie against the respondent bank which is a public limited company registered under the provisions of companies act which is neither created nor governed by any statute. it was mainly argued that respondent bank being a private sector bank is neither a state nor .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 2006 (HC)

Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd., Rep. by Its Managin ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ230

..... of the respondents no. 1 to exercise proper care and caution has been otherwise unmistakably acknowledged in the decision of the kerala high court in an unreported case of seema cashew traders v. manager, export trade corporation of india ltd. and ors. dated 29th september, 1989 in writ appeal no. 767/89 which has held that the ..... of corporation, ecgc itself in regard to the exercise of its discretion which it is called upon to exercise. they further held that, 'in these days when acting with utmost carelessness is the order of the day if some procedure has been established for dealing with certain amount of care and caution, we fail to see how ..... m/s. vamadev exports. after considering the schemes and guidelines of ecgc and after finding that it is not a case of blacklisting and neither capricious, nor arbitrary act and no breach of principles of natural justice, the learned single judge dismissed the said writ petition. 17. learned counsel for the appellant also pressed into service the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2009 (HC)

Madras Gymkhana Club Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(Mad)176; [2009]183TAXMAN333(Mad)

..... authorities. under rule 1c(c), the committee of the club has been empowered to invest its surplus funds in banking companies as defined in the banking regulation act, 1949 or units issued by the unit trust of india or in securities of undertaking of the state government or in the government of india provided such investments ..... by themselves to a fund which could only be expended or returned to themselves.the hon'ble supreme court made it clear that section 2(24) of the act recognise the principle of mutuality and is exclusive of businesses involving such business except those mentioned under clause (vii) of that section. section 2(24)(vii) which ..... its income are covered by the concept of mutuality and therefore exempted from tax. the assistant commissioner of income tax, issued notice under section 148 of the 1961 act to the assessee in so far as the madras gymkhana club was concerned. consequent to such notice, necessary enquiry was held and ultimately the order of assessment came .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2002 (HC)

Ganeshammal and ors. Vs. Arunachalam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2002Mad417

..... misrepresenting the facts and by hiding and not disclosing the earlier proceedings, has somehow or other managed to obtain the probate of the will. it is a blatant act of forgery and against the rules as laid down for obtaining probate. revocation and annulment are asked for for a just cause. the respondent having obtained the grant ..... the magistrate there were nearly fifty hearings and the death of santha bai was never mentioned. the applicants told the respondent that sarojini ammal took santha bal to her native place at suruttapalli village and assuming that she was in a safe place, the respondent kept quiet. the applicants never informed the respondent about santha ..... bal's whereabouts. there was no abuse of process by the respondent for obtaining the probate.the allegations about the first applicant feeling giddy and all the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 2002 (HC)

T. Sarveswara Rao Vs. T. Sathyanarayana and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2002Mad487

..... well settled that the conscience of the court must be satisfied that the will in question was not only executed and attested in the manner required under the indian succession act, 1925, but it should also be found that the said will was the product of the free volition of the executant who had voluntarily executed the same after knowing and ..... and similarly the gold ornaments of the mother-in-law were distributed among them, and thus, the family arrangement entered into between all the members of the family was actually acted upon, and hence, in view of the will executed by kutumba sastri on 28-2-1992 and the family arrangement entered into by all the parties on 3-6-1993 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2007 (HC)

M. Mani Vs. Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited and the Pre ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)IIILLJ282Mad

..... respondent has not disputed the jurisdiction of the labour court in deciding the validity of the order passed by the first respondent, as per the industrial disputes act. in the awards passed by the labour court, it has been held that the departmental enquiry was not conducted in accordance with the principles of natural ..... . as contended by the learned counsel for the appellants, the labour court can go into the appreciation of evidence, while passing award, under the industrial disputes act, where as the jurisdiction of this court under article 226 is comparatively limited. according to the learned counsel for the appellants, the judgment of acquittal recorded by ..... . aggrieve by the order of termination from service, the first appellant and the deceased appellant have raised industrial dispute under section 2a(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, claiming reinstatement of service with all consequential benefits in i.d.nos. 801/93 and 839/93. the labour court, vellore, by its judgment, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2007 (HC)

Arunkumar Vs. State, Sub Inspector of Police and Sangeetha

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(3)CTC741

..... some days, there is nothing in the complaint which connects her with an offence under section 498-a or any other offence of which cognizance was taken. certain acts of taunting and ill-treatment of the informant by her sister-in-law (the appellant) were alleged but they do not pertain to dowry demand or entrustment and ..... dowry demand or entrustment and misappropriation of the property belonging to her, then the offence of 498-a or 406 i.p.c. and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act, are not made out.3. per contra, learned government advocate (crl. side) submitted that there are specific and definite allegations revealed against the petitioner herein who has ..... initiated against the petitioner along with other accused for the offences under section 498-a and 506(ii) i.p.c. and under section 4 of dowry prohibition act.2. it is vehemently contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is absolutely no allegation neither in the complaint nor in the statement recorded from the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2011 (HC)

Kulanchi Ammal and anr. Vs. Jaishankar

Court : Chennai

..... the will and they repeated about the execution like a parrot and though they technically proved the due execution of the will as per section 63 of the indian succession act, having regard to the suspicious circumstance stated above, the will cannot be said to have been proved and the respondent cannot claim any right under the will.16. i am .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //