Court : Chennai
..... to the materials available on record before passing such an order. therefore, the commissioner, suo motu, exercising the powers conferred on him under section 263 of the act, revised the order of assessment passed by the assessing officer. however, learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that the commissioner may be directed to re-consider ..... during the course of assessment proceedings; the said amount partakes the character of advance, so as to attract the provisions of section 2(22)(e) of the act; this aspect was not looked into by the assessing officer while completing the assessment on 30.09.2005 and therefore, this constituted an error, which is ..... and that the amount received from the sister concern from october 1997 amounted to deemed dividend within the meaning of section 2(22)(e) of the act since the assessee had stopped all business activities from the said period. challenging the said order, the assessee filed an appeal before the income tax appellate tribunal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... : 16.it is one thing to say that the public sector banks having regard to the provisions of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970 should discharge their functions keeping in mind the larger public interest but ordinarily in the matter of enforcement of contract, they are to be governed by ..... monetary stability or sound economic growth having due regard to the interests of the depositors etc. as provided under section 5(c)(a) of the banking regulation act does not mean that the private companies carrying on the business or commercial activity of banking, discharge any public function or public duty. these are all ..... compliance with those provisions. for instance, if a private employer dispenses with the service of its employee in violation of the provisions contained under the industrial disputes act, in innumerable cases the high court interfered and has issued the writ to the private bodies and the companies in that regard. but the difficulty in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... said telegram.7. we have given our anxious consideration to the arguments of both sides and perused the materials placed before us.8. the petitioner has been detained under act 14 of 1982. he has been furnished with a booklet. it contains copies of documents. in this booklet, at page 180, in the arrest memo, it is ..... petitioner, ganesh @ lingesan, s/o.subramani, at liberty.order(order of the court was made by p.devadass, j.)1. the petitioner, who has been detained under act 14 of 1982 brandishing him a goonda, challenges the detention order dated 25.11.2011.2. noticing the adverse criminal statistics submitted by the sponsoring authority, the detaining authority ..... corpus calling for the records relating to the detention order in memo no.601/bdfgissv/2011, dated 25.11.2011 passed by the second respondent under the tamil nadu act 14 of 1982 and quash the same and direct the respondent to produce the petitioner, ganesh @ lingesan, s/o.subramani now confined in central prison, puzhal, before .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... agreed upon at the time of deposit, interest being received either periodically or at maturity. hence, a depositor who seeks payment before maturity is not acting as per the contract. subject to observance of rules and procedure governing repayment of term deposits before maturity, managers are authorised to permit such withdrawals of ..... negligent manner. the respondent is a public sector nationalised bank performing public duties and they should function fairly whereas the way in which the officials acted fraudulently and unlawfully would definitely erode the image of the bank and demolish the confidence of the public in the banking system, which is not ..... necessity for the petitioner to wait for conclusion of cbi investigation.28. the officials of the respondent bank should have exhibited skill prudence, responsibility while acting upon the alleged authorisation letters produced by lawrence said to have been given by the petitioner. as the authorisation letter does not contain the name of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... and procedures were framed regarding disciplinary action. the appellant before the supreme court was issued with a show cause notice, calling for explanation for certain acts of misconduct. following an enquiry, he was terminated from service. when the said order was challenged, it was opposed on the ground of maintainability. ..... and latin america. insofar as the administration and governance is concerned, a memorandum of agreement was entered into between the government of india and ford foundation (acting on behalf of the consultative group) on 28th march 1972, by which, the institute shall be established in india as an autonomous, international philanthropic, non- ..... fact that their activity is closely intertwined with governmental activity, characterises their action as 'state action'. at the minimum, the requirement would be to act fairly in the matter of admission of students and probably in the matter of recruitment and treatment of its employees as well. the private educational .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... . the case of the applicants was that the first applicant was the executive committee member of the south indian artist association, which is a registered society under the societies registration act, 1860 with registration no.50/1952. it was established for the purpose of promotion of harmonious and brotherly relations among the members of the artist world and to seek ways ..... long term lease deed of the trust property in favour of the second respondent. the creation of board of trustees of nine trustees were not done. the two trustees cannot act on their own by relying upon the saving clause found in the trust deed. under these circumstances, the applicants have sought for leave. 7. in the counter affidavit filed by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... limited, kumbakonam. 5.t.swaminathan 6.the branch manager, new india assurance company limited, erode. 7.r.amsavalli .. respondents civil miscellaneous appeal filed under section 173 of the motor vehicle act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 19.05.2004, made in m.a.c.t.o.p.no.13 of 2001, on the file of the motor accident claims .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... or mismanagement.27. once the benefit of job work was utilized for the benefit of company to discharge its liability, it cannot be said, that the respondents acted in a manner prejudicial to the interest of the company or that it amounts to oppression of the minority shareholders.28. as regards the allegations of electricity bill, ..... the said sums to the 1st respondent company; iv.to hold the 2nd and 3rd respondent liable for all violations of the 1st respondent company under the companies act 1956; v.to grant permanent injunction restraining the 2nd and 3rd respondent from alienating the immovable and movable assets of the 1st respondent company; vi.to grant permanent ..... as joint signatory.11. the bankers of respondent no.1 have also recalled the credit facilities and advances made to the respondent company and issued a notice under sarfaesi act, 2002.12. the stand of the appellants before the learned company law board was, that on receipt of notices from bank, it came to their notices, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... pending trial before the learned xii additional sessions judge and special judge for cbi cases, chennai, for the offence under section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(e) of pc act, 1988 and section 109 of ipc. the allegations are that respondent no.3 has acquired property disproportionate to his known source of income, and respondent no.1 had abetted the ..... has been filed under order xiv rule 8 of o.s.rules r/w order xxvi rule 9 of the code of civil procedure r/w section 3 of partition act for passing a final decree in the above suit by allotting 2/3rd share to the applicant by metes and bounds based on the advocate commissioner's report.2. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... . he would justify the action of the respondent, in insisting fresh essentiality certificate, on the ground that since neither the indian medical council act nor the regulations prescribed any time limit, the gap and the ambiguity created with regard to the aspect of validity period of the essentiality certificate ..... by the appellant/petitioner.5. mr.vijaynarayanan, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant would stiffly argue that neither the indian medical council act nor the regulations framed thereunder specify any time limit for the essentiality certificate issued by the state government and therefore, the decision of the respondent ..... 2012 sree balaji medical college & hospital (constituent college of bharath institute of higher education and research (bharath university) registered under the tamil nadu societies registration act vide regn.no.36 of 1995, no.7, works road, chromepet, chennai, rep.by its deputy registrar, prof.dr.s.boominathan ... appellant vs. medical .....
Tag this Judgment!