Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within ten days from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... 4.2. counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive ukuya, he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within ten days from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... petitioners do not wish to revive impl and iapl, they would take steps under section 248 w.p.(c) 2051/2018 page 2 of 4 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within ten days from today. in addition thereto, for ..... will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 4.2. counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive radioshack, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within three weeks from today. in addition thereto, for ..... will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of three weeks from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 4.2. counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive adtpl, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive vsts and iapl they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra).5. furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the benefit ..... will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 6.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten (10) days from today. 6.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation ..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 6.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within ten (10) days from today. in addition thereto .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within 10 days from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of 10 days from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... 3.2. counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive weiss, she would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the benefit .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 4.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within 10 days from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioner mutatis mutandis. 4.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of 10 days from today. 4.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... 3.2. counsel for the petitioner says that since the petitioner does not wish to revive weiss, he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 3.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that he would also like to avail the benefit of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... 4.2. counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive psmn, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the ..... will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten (10) days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of ..... time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within ten (10) days from today. in addition thereto, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... such time the respondents take requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioner made to them in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioner within ten (10) days from today. in addition thereto, for ..... therein will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioner will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of ten (10) days from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the ..... since the petitioner does not wish to revive iapl he would take steps under section 248 (2) of the w.p.(c) 2122/2018 page 2 of 4 companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... such time the respondent takes requisite decision with regard to the request of the petitioners made to it in consonance with the provisions under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018. 5.3 needful will be done by the petitioners within two weeks from today. in addition thereto, for the ..... will apply to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. 5.1 the petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 and under the condonation of delay scheme, 2018 within a period of two weeks from today. 5.2 in order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned ..... running. 4.2. counsel for the petitioners says that since the petitioners do not wish to revive foms, they would take steps under section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013 in consonance with the directives contained in sandeep singh (supra). w.p. (c) 2053/2018 page 2 of 4 4.3 furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says .....
Tag this Judgment!