Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 38 falsifying official documents and false declaration Page 89 of about 1,199 results (0.307 seconds)

May 07 2014 (HC)

Mrs.Alka Puri Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... mother late saroj sharma ex.pw1/2 , certified copy of adoption deed ex.pw1/3 and affidavit in terms of schedule iii under section 19-i of the court fee act, 1870 ex.pw1/4 .6. since there was no opposition to the grant of letters of administration from the side of the brothers and the sister of the deceased ravindra .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2014 (HC)

Union of India Vs. Suchitra Goswami

Court : Delhi

..... , as fair . the respondent learnt of the reason for her not being placed on the directors list in the year 1994 by invoking the provisions of the right to information act. the respondent disputed the said below bench mark acrs of 1987 by making her representation. the said disputed acrs were upgraded to good on 28.03.1999. the respondent made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Vicky Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... suffered by the accused does not result in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses to be outrightly rejected. if the court finds it probable that the accused might have acted in exercise of right of selfdefence, the court ought to proceed to consider whether they have exceeded the same. [(1994) 2 scc191state of u.p. v. ..... and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months concerning the injuries inflicted upon bittoo and balvinder, attributing intention or knowledge to the two that by their acts they would have committed an offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. the two have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and pay ..... is : as per mohan lal and vicky the incident was triggered by meena, bittoo, balvinder and their mother chand rani, compelling mohan lal and vicky to act in discharge of their right to private defence during which meena, bittoo and balvinder were injured; and as per the prosecution, mohan lal and his three sons and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2014 (HC)

Mohan Lal Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... suffered by the accused does not result in the testimony of the prosecution witnesses to be outrightly rejected. if the court finds it probable that the accused might have acted in exercise of right of selfdefence, the court ought to proceed to consider whether they have exceeded the same. [(1994) 2 scc191state of u.p. v. ..... and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for two months concerning the injuries inflicted upon bittoo and balvinder, attributing intention or knowledge to the two that by their acts they would have committed an offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. the two have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and pay ..... is : as per mohan lal and vicky the incident was triggered by meena, bittoo, balvinder and their mother chand rani, compelling mohan lal and vicky to act in discharge of their right to private defence during which meena, bittoo and balvinder were injured; and as per the prosecution, mohan lal and his three sons and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2014 (HC)

M.Nisha Akbar Vs. the Superintendent of Police,

Court : Chennai

..... / a life convict, bearing prisoner no.16808, is concerned, in kottar p.s.cr.no.1151/1994, for the offences under sections 302, 148, 143 and 144 of indian explosive act, he was convicted to death sentence by the learned sessions judge, thirunelveli, on 05.10.1998. further, he was admitted in central prison, palayamkottai on 05.10.1998. the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 2014 (HC)

Chairman, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and Another Vs. S. Arul Selvan ...

Court : Karnataka

..... that the c.b.i. had investigated and recommended that the evidence was not strong enough for successful prosecution of the appellant under section 5(1)(e) of the act. it had, however, recommended to take disciplinary action. no doubt, much time elapsed in taking necessary decisions at different levels. so, the delay by itself cannot be ..... 1687/2007 and 6892/2003 and civil appeal no.954/2009 (arising out of slp (c) no.22300/2007 - rajasthan state road transport corporation and anr. vs. bal mukund bairwa" 15. regarding the first contention of respondent no.1 that the disciplinary/enquiry proceedings were initiated after lapse of five years after he joined the appellant company, ..... during the course of his arguments, made the submission that respondent no.1 was working as a chief manager (msandt) at appellant company and in view of certain act of misconduct alleged to have been committed by respondent no.1, charge sheet dated 12.4.2012 (annexure-n) was issued to him, for which, respondent no.1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2016 (HC)

Akole Taluka Education Society and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

..... examined the issue while placing reliance upon its earlier judgment in grindlays bank limited v. ito-air 1980 sc 656 and held that no person can suffer from the act of the court and in case an interim order has been passed and the petitioner takes advantage thereof, and ultimately the petition stands dismissed, the interest of justice ..... no one, becomes applicable in such a case. in such a situation the court is under an obligation to undo the wrong done to a party by the act of the court. thus, any undeserved or unfair advantage gained by a party invoking the jurisdiction of the court must be neutralised, as the institution of litigation cannot ..... party invoking the jurisdiction of the court must be neutralised, as the institution of litigation cannot be permitted to confer any advantage on a suitor from delayed action by the act of the court. 35. in case of kalabharati advertising vs. hemant vimalnath narichania and others (2010) 9 scc 437), in the context of effect of interim reliefs, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2016 (HC)

Gunasekaran Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, Perambalur District

Court : Chennai

..... , we are afraid the evidence of pw-4 and pw-5 is hardly an evidence in law to establish such offence. in that situation section 32(1) of the evidence act does not get attracted. 34. recently, in subhash vs. state of maharashtra [criminal appeal no.93 of 2003 dated 15.6.2016],under similar circumstances, the accused was acquitted ..... disjuncted from the offence under section 306, ipc the question of her death is not an issue for consideration and on that premise also section 32 (1) of the evidence act will stand at bay so far as these materials are concerned. (emphasis supplied by me) 30. in bhairaon singh vs. staste of madhya pradesh [air 2009 sc 2603] in connection ..... (supra), the hon'ble supreme court held as under: 7. unless the statement of a dead person would fall within the purview of section 32(1) of the indian evidence act there is no other provision under which the same can be admitted in evidence. in order to make the statement of a dead person admissible in law (written or verbal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 2016 (HC)

Nisha Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secreta ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... , radhakrishnan, pauldurai, oliver, doss @ andhikannan doss and ramesh were convicted for the commission of the offences under sections 302, 302 r/w 149, 148, section 3 of indian explosives substances act, 1908 and sections 326 and 392 r/w 149 of ipc., sentenced to death and various spells of imprisonment. 2. the convicts challenging the legality of the conviction and sentence .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 2016 (HC)

The National Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Branch Manager Vs. ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... (v) in reshma kumari and others v. madan mohan reported in (2009) 13 scc 422, the hon'ble apex court reiterated that the compensation awarded under the act should be just and also identified the factors which should be kept in mind while determining the amount of compensation. the relevant portions of the judgment are extracted below: the ..... observations which can appropriately be applied for deciding the petitions filed under section 166 of the act: we must emphasise that the court has to strike a balance between the inflated and unreasonable demands of a victim and the equally untenable claim of the ..... (sc), the hon'ble supreme court, comprising of three hon'ble judges bench was dealing with a case arising out of a complaint filed under the consumer protection act, 1986. while enhancing the compensation awarded by the national consumer disputes redressal commission from rs.15 lakhs to rs.1 crore, the hon'ble bench made the following .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //