Court : Sikkim
..... be, by the state level environment impact assessment authority, duly constituted by the central government under sub-section (3) of section 3 of the said act, in accordance with the procedure specified hereinafter in this notification. 2. requirements of prior environmental clearance (ec):- the following projects or activities shall require ..... february 2002 requested the state government to list out such areas and furnish detailed proposals for their notification as ecosensitive areas under the environment (protection) act, 1986. however many states/departments had raised concerns over the 10 km range limits. the matter was, therefore, placed before the national board for ..... the various provisions to indicate the scope of these two legislations. he, however, emphasized that under sections 18 and 35 under chapter iv of the act provided for protected areas it was the state governments which had been vested with the power to declare sanctuaries and national parks respectively. similarly, under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Sikkim
..... compensation the relevant multiplier as prescribed under the second schedule to section 163a of the act was adopted and nothing further. the components of award on pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages claimed by the appellants were awarded as being reasonable and just as per ..... set aside. (vi) the second contention raised by mr. tsewang namgyal that the award had been erroneously passed by the learned claims tribunal under section 163a of the act, in my view, does not appear to be correct. on a perusal of the impugned judgment, it is quite evident that the learned claims tribunal, while computing the ..... witness box to prove that he had indeed issued the income certificate. even otherwise, it is trite that in cases filed under the provisions of the motor vehicles act, 1988, the strict rules of evidence are not applicable. as noted earlier, the respondent no.2- company chose not to appear and contest the case before the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Sikkim
..... by the learned trial court that the witness stated that he did not make entries in mo-xxi on 28-11-2003 till midnight. (xlii) p.w.48, bal bahadur subba, testified of the i.o. conducting inquest for the dead body of the deceased, sonam dadul bhutia, at the place of occurrence on 28-11-2003 ..... and are perverse to the evidence on record. as per him, although the learned sessions judge upheld the validity of statements under section 27 of the indian evidence act, 1872, of the various accused persons and the consequential recovery of the incriminating articles like the weapons of offence, but fell in error in not considering those as ..... .l.j. 2017 (sc). (ii) mr. n. rai emphasised the unsustainability of the recoveries made on the basis of the statements under section 27 of the evidence act, made by the respondents and the delinquent accused roshan rai as their voluntariness in making them statements were clearly suspect. it was further submitted that the disclosure statement exhibit 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!