Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 32 escape from custody Court: kerala Page 9 of about 111 results (0.084 seconds)

Yahia Mohamed Haneefa Vs. the Superintendent of Police

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013 16TH MAGHA 193 WP(Crl.).No. 18 of 2013 (S) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- YAHIA MOHAMED HANEEFA AGED 4 YEARS S/O.SULAIMAN, ADHIL APARTMENTS, NGO QUARTERS MAITHRIPURAM ROAD, THRIKKAKARA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT021. BY ADV. SRI.SUNIL V.MOHAMMED RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE COLLEGE JUNCTION, PATHANAMTHITTA 68 645.2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT501. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PANDALAM POLICE STATION PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT501. 4. YOUSUFF H S/O.HAMEED, KOODATHINAL KIZHAKKETHIL, FATHIMA MANZIL THONNALLUR P.O, PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA 68 501 PRESENTLY AT P.B 28659.RABUWA, RIYAD 11447 5. SOUDHAMMAL W/O.ANSARI, KOODATHINAL, THONNALLUR P.O PANDALAM, PATHANAMTHITTA 68 501. R1,2,3 BY ADV. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRO...

Kerala Electrical Alled Engineering Colt Vs. G.Muraleedharan Pillai

Court : Kerala

..... as stated earlier, it is too late for the appellant to contend that the first respondent is not entitled to any benefits under section 25(f) of the act. the said question as to whether the workman is entitled to be said benefits has already been decided in op4814of 1991 between the same parties. this judgment will ..... p4814of 1981 and after hearing the appellant management; the court came to the conclusion that this very workman was entitled to the protection of section 25(f) of the act. this judgment was an elaborate judgment to which the appellant was a party. subsequently, the workman filed another writ petition seeking reinstatement in op5646of 1986 and that was ..... i.e, termination of the vacancy. by the said judgment, liberty was also reserved to approach the labour court under section 33 c(2) of the i d act for computation of the monetary value due to him.2. subsequently, again, when the petitioner was before this court claiming reinstatement into service, this court by ext.p2 judgment .....

ibrahim K.M Vs. the Kottayam District Co-op.Bank Ltd

Court : Kerala

..... or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to refrain from all steps initiated pursuant to securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002 against the petitioners including ext. p1 and p2 notice. (iii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to w.p ..... of the adverse circumstances, the repayment could not be effected on time, as scheduled, which made the petitioner a defaulter and the bank proceeded with the steps under the sarfaesi act, after declaring the account as 'npa'. in the said circumstance, the petitioner approached this court with the following prayers : "(i) call for the records leading to ext. p1 and p2 .....

D. Thulasi Vs. Union Bank of India

Court : Kerala

..... by the petitioners, which made the respondent bank to proceed with further steps by filing a petition before the chief judicial magistrate's court, thiruvananthapuram under section 14 of the 'act'; pursuant to which, an advocate commissioner has been appointed, who has issued ext.p2 notice for taking physical possession.4. the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners ..... respondent bank on the strength of security interest created over the property in question. since, the timely repayment could not be effected, the bank proceeded with steps under the sarfaesi act, which in turn are under challenge in this writ petition.2. the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the default was never wilful, but because of some unforeseen circumstance .....

ing Vysya Bank Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2008Ker31; 2008(1)KLJ177

..... the petitioner where the respondents may initiate demonstration and also to take appropriate action against any person violating the provisions of section 36ad of the banking regulation act.ii) grant such other reliefs which are appropriate and incidental in this proceeding and which this hon'ble court deems fit and proper.2. the direction ..... banking company, any demonstration which is violent or which prevents, or is calculated to prevent, the transaction of normal business by the banking company, or(c) act in any manner calculated to undermine the confidence of the depositors in the banking company.(2) whoever contravenes any provision of sub-section (1) without any reasonable ..... of such offence. therefore, the direction sought to the police to take appropriate action against the persons violating the provisions of section 36-ad of the act, cannot also be granted. if anybody is holding demonstration in violation of any provisions of law or infringing any rights of the petitioner, it can move .....

R.Asok Kumar Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... that the devaswom is running three educational institutions, namely, the sree krishna college, sree krishna higher secondary school and sree krishna english medium school. the act enables guruvayur devaswom managing committee to incur the expenditures for the establishment and management of any educational institutions owned by it or even owned by others ..... the convenience of the worshipers" and, therefore the spending of amounts on the school cannot be justified. our attention was invited to section 27(f) of the act and the proviso to the section which reads as follows: "27. authority of committee to incur expenditure for certain purposes:- ....... (f) the establishment and ..... taher saifuddin saheb v. state of bombay [air1962sc853 it was held in para.58 "that the provision contained in s.24(3)(f) of guruvayoor devaswom act, 1971 (kerala) empowering a secular authority, namely, the state government to sanction the diversion of devaswom funds for purposes unconnected with the devaswom and its .....

Chirakkara Powrasamithi Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... india and others [2013 (1) scc403. in the said case, what was at issue was whether the objections raised under section 5a of the land acquisition act had been properly considered or not. it has been held by the honourable supreme court that the recommendations made by the district collector without duly considering the objections ..... district. w.p(c) no.9438 of 2013 is filed by the chirakkara powrasamithi, a society registered under the travancore cochin literary, scientific and charitable societies registration act, 1955, and two others. the society has been formed for the alleged purpose of protecting the welfare and well-being of the residents of the area. ..... out by the learned government pleader at that time that their objections could be considered during the enquiry under section 5a of the land acquisition act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as `the act' for short), which was in progress at that time. however, it was contended that the objections of the petitioners being against the .....

Baisil Attippety @ Basil A.G. Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... : pj wp(c).no. 9575 of 2014 (v) -------------------------------------- appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits ------------------------------------- p1. true copy of the representation of the people (amendment and validation) act, 2013. p2. true copy of the judgment of hon'ble supreme court dated107-2013 in jan chaukidarv. union of india, upholding the patna high court judgment dated304-2004 ..... of a state", the words "under the provisions of this chapter, and on no other ground" shall be inserted.3. in section 62 of the principal act, after the proviso to sub-section (5), the following proviso shall be inserted , namely:- "provided further that by reason of the prohibition to vote under ..... of the constitution; and (iii) arbitrariness of the law. xx xx xx 40. consequently, we are of the opinion that the impugned amendment and validation act, 2013 is consistent with the principle of universal and equal suffrage and the presumption of innocence of the accused until proven guilty.41. in view of the .....

Muhammed YasIn Vs. P.P. Abdul Majeed

Court : Kerala

..... 2005-e15compare the admitted writing with the disputed writing and come to its own independent conclusion. such exercise of comparison is permissible under section 73 of the evidence act. ordinarily, sections 45 and 73 are complementary to each other. evidence of the handwriting expert need not be invariably corroborated. it is for the court to decide ..... ble supreme court again in safi mohammed v. state of rajasthan [(2013) 8 scc601, wherein the appellant assailed the conviction section 3(1)(c) of the official secrets act, 1923. main attack was on the experts' opinion of air force officers, which was relied on, in the light of the judgment reported in air1999sc3318but the apex ..... "36. the contentions urged by the learned counsel on behalf of the appellant that pw27and pw32are not expert witnesses in terms of section 45 of the evidence act by placing reliance upon the decisions of this court referred to supra are misplaced and they do not support the case of defence for the reason that the .....

V.Parameswaran Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... writ petitioner and certain other employees were transferred to fci and consequently, in terms of clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (4) of section 12a of the act the petitioner exercised option, in fact, two options as has been done by the writ petitioner and the others. in other words, evidently, like them the petitioner also ..... dispute and, in fact, they could not dispute the availability of such options under clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (4) of section 12a of the act and also of the fact that the writ petitioner had exercised such options in the manner made mention hereinbefore. as noticed hereinbefore, in the counter affidavit filed by the respondents ..... from time to time or the leave, provident fund or other terminal benefits admissible to the employees of the corporation under the regulation made by the corporation under this act, and such option once exercised shall be final." 3. for the sake of convenience, hereafter in this judgment, the scale of pay referred to in the first .....