Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 32 escape from custody Court: kerala Page 2 of about 111 results (0.382 seconds)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Baby and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(3)KLJ626

..... down from the vehicle and sustained serious head injuries which resulted in his death. his dependents filed an application for compensation under section 163-a of the motor vehicles act. the tribunal awarded compensation under section 163-a. the insurance of the vehicle was admitted. there was no pleading in the written statement that rider of the ..... be denied. section 163-a reads as follows:163-a. special provisions as to payment of compensation on structured formula basis: (1) notwithstanding anything contained in this act or in any other law for the time being in force or instrument having the force of law, the owner of the motor vehicle or the authorised insurer shall ..... as the case may be.explanation. - for the purposes of this sub-section, 'permanent disability' shall have he same meaning and extent as in the workman's compensation act, 1923 (8 of 1923).(2) in any claim for compensation under sub-section (1), the claimant shall not be required to plead or establish that the death or .....

Joe Tutu George Vs. Medical Council of India

Court : Kerala

..... : " i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to issue registration certificate as prescribed under section 23 of the indian medical council act 1956 and regulation 64 of the indian medical council registration 2000 to the petitioner as applied for under ext.p4 forthwith; ii) direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to .....

E.P.Ramanan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... the petitioner shall be dealt with as per the provisions of the kerala (scheduled castes and scheduled tribes) regulation of issue of community op(kat) 120/14 3 certificates act, 1996 (act 11 of 1996). it was further ordered that no additional benefits should be availed of by the petitioners which are available to the members of scheduled caste community till the ..... months from today to the scrutiny committee and scrutiny committee may issue notice, take evidence and give a op(kat) 120/14 9 finding in accordance with the provisions in act no.11 of 1996 as well as in consonance with the principles of natural justice. till fresh orders are passed by the scrutiny committee, no action based on ext.p5 ..... petitioner during the period he continued in service and issue consequential order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. ashok bhushan, acting chief justice a.m.shaffique, judge tkv

Sunil Kumar.S Vs. The Assistant Registrar of Co-Operative Societies

Court : Kerala

..... , the learned counsel would contend that the petitioner is eminently entitled to interest on the delayed payment of gratuity, in terms of section 7 of the payment of gratuity act, 1972 ('the act' for brevity), and also the definitive judicial pronouncement of the hon'ble supreme court in h. gangahanume gowda v. karnataka agro w.p.(c). no. 3060/2015 ..... efforts to get clarification in this regard from the first respondent did not bear any fruit.12. be that as it may, the statutory mandate of section 7 of the act is quite explicit, admitting of no ambiguity. it is, thus, profitable to extract the relevant portion of the said provision, which reads as follows: "(3a) if the ..... also provision to recover the amount of gratuity with compound interest in case amount of gratuity payable was not paid by the employer in terms of section 8 of the act. it is, in fact, the specific observation of the apex court that once the employer does not satisfy the mandatory requirements of the proviso to section 7(3a .....

The Corporate Manager Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... essence and substance is the heartbeat of fair play. actions are amenable, in the panorama of judicial review only to the extent that the state must act validly for discernible reasons, not whimsically for any ulterior purpose. the meaning and true import and concept of arbitrariness is more easily visualised than precisely defined ..... down this proposition in the context of interpretation of central educational institutions (reservation wa nos.776/2014 & 780/2014 & connected writ petitions -57- in admission) act, 2006.58. learned senior counsel relied upon the decision of the apex court in brij mohan lal's case {(2012) 6 scc502, especially paragraph 137. in ..... the recommendations of, the committee which is more qualified to address these issues." in that case, the question arose under the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 regarding the right of renewal wa nos.776/2014 & 780/2014 & connected writ petitions -51- of mining lease. the government took the decision based .....

Denny Varghese Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... in the case. he had categorically stated in his evidence regarding the involvement of the present revision petitioner and motive for him to commit the offence and also the overt act committed by him. his evidence was supported by the evidence of pw2, who is none other than the mother of pw1, who also sustained injury in the incident. ..... she had also stated about the overt act committed by all the accused persons including the present revision petitioner. pw4 is an independent witness to the incident. he had stated that, he was present at the time ..... r. p.no.1177 of 2014 12 had also stated about the presence of three accused persons including the present revision petitioner and he had also stated about the overt act alleged to have been committed by the accused persons, which he had seen at the time when he reached the place. pw3 is the head constable attached to kayamkulam .....

M/S.Planet Home and Villas (P)ltd. Vs. The State of Kerala and Others

Court : Kerala

..... principles to be applied. the disputes about the meaning of a covenant in a contract or its enforceability have to be determined according to the usual principles of the contract act. every act of a statutory body w.p.(c) nos. 22920/10 & 16278/12 8 need not necessarily involve an exercise of statutory power. statutory bodies, like private parties, have power ..... municipality has committed unilateral breach of contract. since both the writ petitions were filed by the same petitioner against the same set of respondents, raising issues involving a series of acts arising out of one single transaction; namely a contract, this court proposes to dispose of both the writ petitions under a common judgment.2. the facts in brief are that .....

K.G Raveendran Vs. Corporation of Kochi

Court : Kerala

..... on the part of the fourth respondent to forcibly evict the petitioner, has eventually submitted in terms of section 492(4) of the kerala municipality act, 1994 ('the act' for brevity) that there is no legal obligation on the petitioner's part to obtain consent from the landlord for the renewal. in support of ..... corporation, in tune with the averments made in the counter affidavit, has strenuously contended that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy under section 509 of the act. he has also further submitted that the petitioner, despite sufficient opportunity given by the respondent corporation, could not obtain the necessary w.p.(c) nos. 18204 ..... have to address the contention raised by the learned standing counsel that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy under section 509 of the act.14. indisputably, section 509 of the act provides an alternative remedy. the fact, however, remains that the writ petition was filed way back in 2012 and subsequently stood admitted .....

K.N.Thankappan Vs. The Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions

Court : Kerala

..... regard, he placed reliance on maya devi v. krishna bhattathiri, air1981ker.240. contradistinguishing rule 8 of the rules with section 34 of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996, which seems to be an analogous provision, the learned counsel has contended that rule 8 does not contain any peremptory prohibition against the presentation of the ..... to consolidated engg. enterprises (supra) and sumitomo corporation v. cdc financial services (mauritus) ltd., (2004) 4 scc91 to contend that section 14 of the act can be applied to appeal proceedings.20. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the second respondent, the learned counsel for the grama ..... exclusion'.29. in union of india v. popular construction co., (2001) 8 scc470 the hon'ble supreme court has dealt with section 34 of the arbitration & conciliation act. their lordships have examined the ratio laid w.p.(c) no. 35078/2014 :17. : down by a constitution bench in vidyacharan shukla v. khubchand baghel, 1951 .....

K.V.Ayisha Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... fifth respondent is not in strict compliance with sections 4 and 5 of the kerala public wpc1234913 & 12418/13 3 building (eviction of unauthorised occupation) act, 1968 ('the act' for brevity). aggrieved, the petitioners filed w.p. (c)no.23948/2012, pending which the fifth respondent passed exhibit p18 order. the petitioners, ..... the field concerning a developmental activity, it requires judicial deference. more particularly, when all other tenants have surrendered the vacant possession to the fifth respondent, acting on its assurance that once the new shopping complex is put in place, their interests would be taken care of, more particularly given the stipulation ..... of directing the petitioners to file an appeal before the statutory tribunal. apart from submitting exhibit p12 petition under section 191 of the kerala panchayat raj act, the petitioners also filed exhibit p15 appeal before the second respondent, the district collector.4. it seems that the petitioners have also filed appeal no .....