Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 32 escape from custody Court: kerala Page 1 of about 111 results (0.233 seconds)

Beena Kaniyankunnel, Arunagapally and Another Vs. Kerala State Electio ...

Court : Kerala

..... officers were appointed in connection with election to the standing committees authorising to perform any function of the returning officer. sections 42 and 43 of the act act as a pointer to come to the conclusion that in the absence of specific provisions non one can be said to be authorised to perform any ..... , the state election commission has to issue appropriate guidelines/orders. no doubt, such instructions cannot be contrary to or inconsistent with the provisions under the act or the rules. the returning officer is being appointed by the state election commission for conducting elections to the standing committees on a particular date fixed ..... would virtually disable the concerned returning officers from effectually conducting the election to the standing committees to panchayats taking into account the various provisions under the act and the rules in accordance with statutory mandate. annexure-a has been issued by the commission before the date of election and to achieve the above .....

Sasidhara Shenoy and Bros. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and a ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1999)157CTR(Ker)440

..... is entitled to depreciation applicable to the buildings. pursuant to the answer given by this court, the second respondent gave effect to it under section 260 of the income tax act by order dt. 19th may, 1997.3. it appears that subsequently, the full bench considered the question whether a theatre was a plant and by judgment dt. 11th march ..... another assessee. in this view of the matter, we hold that the order passed by the tribunal on 19th may, 1997, under section 260(1) of the income tax act, does not suffer from any mistake apparent on record warranting rectification.'4. shri p.g.k. wariyar appearing for the petitioner submitted that it is axiomatic that a subsequent ..... law. the question is whether on the basis of the full bench decision can the tribunal compel to change its judgment under section 260(1) of the income tax act, which is stated thus'the high court or the supreme court upon hearing any such case shall decide the. questions of law raised therein, and shall deliver its judgment .....

Baisil Attipetty @ Basil a.G. Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... (r) --------------------------- appendix petitioner(s)' exhibits ----------------------- exhibit-p1: true copy of the notification of the central government (ministry of environment and forest) appeared in the gazette of india notifying the ngt act. exhibit-p2: true copy of judgment of the hon'ble supereme court in bhopal gas peedith mahila udyog sangathan & others v.union of india- 2012(8) scc326 exhibit-p3: true .....

M/S.Malabar Industries Vs. Department of Forest

Court : Kerala

..... noc to the petitioner for starting a sandalwood oil unit is not liable to be entertained by virtue of the statutory bar under section 47c (2) of the kerala forest act. the aforesaid provision reads as follows : "47c . prohibition of possession and transport of sandalwood and sandalwood oil - (1) notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force .....

Sister Noyal Mary Jacob Vs. Fr.John C. Puthenveedu

Court : Kerala

..... of a high school, one cont.case (c).1212/13 2 has to have 12 years of continuous graduate service with a pass in the prescribed test under kerala education act and also kerala education rules apart from an account test (lower) conducted by the kerala public service commission." 2. so far as deficit with reference to proviso to rule 44a .....

Binu Paul Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... at the earliest. the state governments and uts also should take immediate steps to frame necessary rules under section 15 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 taking into consideration the recommendations of moef in its report of march 2010 and model guidelines framed by the ministry of mines, government of india. communicate the ..... determine. rule 8(b) of the kerala protection of river banks and regulation of removal of sand rules 2002 lays down that the district expert committee under the act, shall determine the quantum of river sand that could be removed from each 'kadavu' annually after the monsoon. the practicable way out for scientific and ecologically sustainable ..... by the national green tribunal also arises for consideration. the impact of the amendment to section 14 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 by act 37 of 1986 with effect from 10.2.1987 also arises for consideration. by virtue of the said amendment, section 14 of the .....

Thomas Antony Rep.by Mary Abraham Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce and Ot ...

Court : Kerala

..... the settlement deed no.1002/1958 of kanjirappally sro, executed by the father of the petitioner. exhibit p2 : true copy of the op (mh) 146/10 under the mental health act before the hon'ble district court, kottayam. exhibit p3 : true copy of the claim petition i.a.no.1518/09 filed by the petitioner before the second respondent. exhibit p4 .....

Adv.T.P.Dayananthan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... the said judgment and the discussion made by learned single judge, we notice, there is vast difference between the two provisions. under tamil nadu advocates welfare fund act, members were allowed to get admitted to welfare fund and the high court opined that after making contribution for several years, such advocates cannot be denied benefit of ..... as a member of welfare fund. section 15(1a) of kerala advocates welfare fund act reads as under: "15(1a) an advocate who is eligible for or availed of any kind of retirement benefits for the service under the central or state ..... c.j.petitioner is before us challenging judgment of learned single judge. the challenge before learned single judge is section 15(1a) of kerala advocates welfare fund act, wherein a restriction is brought for an advocate who was previously under service of central or state government or any public or private sector undertaking to get admission .....

Nair Mohan Sivaram Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... swerve the vehicle, no independent evidence has been adduced to prove this aspect. the jeep driver is expected to keep a safe distance from the ongoing vehicle and if this act had followed, the accident would have been averted by him.11. it is true that the motor vehicle inspector who was examined as pw14 had stated that from the ..... of pws 3, 4 and 5 is not sufficient to attract none of the offences alleged and at the most it may amount to error of judgment and not reckless act and thereby the courts below were not justified in convicting the revision petitioner for the offences alleged. he had relied on the decisions reported in jahid shaikh and others ..... from the opposite direction driven by the deceased with pw5 as pillion rider of the scooter succumbed to the injuries while pw5 sustained grievous injuries on account of the negligent act of the revision petitioner and thereby he had committed the offences under sections 279, 337, 338 and 304 a of the indian penal code. crl.r.p.no.1178 .....

C.K.Sajan Vs. Shri Antony Chacko

Court : Kerala

..... is why it has been held that an informant does not have a right of filing an appeal under section 19 of the act against an order refusing to initiate the contempt proceedings or disposing of the application or petition filed for initiating such proceedings. he cannot be called an aggrieved party." (emphasis added ..... is just an informer or relator. his duty ends with the facts being brought to the notice of the court. it is thereafter for the court to act on such information or not to act though the private party or litigant moving the court may at the discretion of the court continue to render its assistance during the course of proceedings. that .....