Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 26 unbecoming conduct Sorted by: old Court: jammu and kashmir Page 8 of about 116 results (0.401 seconds)

Bari Brahmana Industries Asso and anr. Vs. Power Development Deptt., a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ464

..... has justifiably declined to observe any thing on the issue of electricity duty, which is a tax levied in accordance with the electricity duty act, 1963 (state act) and the levy of this duty being beyond the purview of the commission.100. the commission has taken a serious note of the unsatisfactory ..... tariff, transparent policies regarding subsidies, promotion of efficient and environmentally benign policies and matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.40. section 3 of the act mandates the government to establish a commission known as the state electricity regulatory commission by a notification in the government gazette to be a body corporate ..... 7.2: htindustryapplicability12.12 this schedule shall be applicable to all units registered with the industries department, government of j&k;, and covered under the factories act.this shall include flour mills, hullers, power-looms, rice mills, dal mills, oil mills, ice factories, cold storage plants, masala grinders, other industrial .....

Noor Mohd. Sheikh Vs. Igp Crime Branch

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3310

..... dated 26-5-2006 as was permissible under j & k migrant immovable property ((preservation, protection and restraint on distress sales) act, 1997.11. the said order has been challenged before the financial commissioner. financial commissioner, had stayed the order which was also challenged before this court, same was set aside.12 ..... has been filed.10. basically respondent no. 3 is a migrant for sale of his property, at srinagar has executed general power of attorney in favour of the petitioner who acted on the general power of attorney sought permission for alienation from the prescribed authority i.e. divisional commissioner, kashmir, same has been granted vide order no. 190 divk of 2006 .....

Mohammad Ayub Bhat Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2137,2008(3)JKJ391

..... declaration. it was not necessary for the petitioner to have made such a declaration as he could otherwise had been appointed as a trainee engineer. it is important that the act of the accused will have to connect to the benefit which he has procured by making this false declaration. there is no benefit which has accrued to the petitioner both ..... 22.2.1997.6. the order reveals that the remuneration of rs. 2500/- are required to be paid to the petitioner w.e.f. 1.12.1998. it is this act of the petitioner which is sought to be investigated and on the basis of which the charge sheet is required to be filed by the police.7. the question before .....

Baldev Raj and ors. Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ294

..... or the circumstances leading to such death. if a statement which otherwise is covered by the hearsay rule does not fall within the exceptions of section 32 of the evidence act, the same cannot be relied upon for finding the guilt of the accused.25. the trial court has, therefore, erred in holding the appellants guilty under section 498a rpc ..... (the deceased). she further told that mate au banchei debenahin.such a statement appears to have been taken on record with the aid of section 32 of the indian evidence act at a time when the appellant was being tried for the offence under section 304-b and such statement was admissible under clause (1) of the said section as it ..... in expw-dd/1 that she had been maltreated and troubled by the appellants for not bringing enough dowry would be inadmissible in evidence, as section 32 of the evidence act would not make such statement admissible as it did not relate to the cause of her death. i am supported in taking this view by gananath pattnaik v. state .....

Three Star Enterprises Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2009J& K45

..... of the government of india or (the government of a state within the indian union excluding the jammu and kashmir state) or the state, or with the sovereign acts of a foreign government.25. the decrees for injunction as such cannot normally be granted which prevent the statutory authorities to discharge their statutory functions.26. section 107 of ..... unit and have warned the plaintiff that all the timber will be shifted from the unit of plaintiff to some other place. he has further alleged that the act/interference of the defendants is illegal and unjustified as the investigation of the vigilance department is at preliminary stage. the cause of action has been shown to have ..... than five years. he has further pleaded that he is conducting his affairs merely in accordance with the guide lines and rules, prescribed by j & k forest act. the plaintiff has further averred in the plaint that he has been running the unit to the satisfaction of the defendants from the date of its installation and no .....

S. Surjeet Singh Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2142

..... of rpc.25. a conjoint reading of above said pro-visions admit of no doubt or ambiguity about petitioner' being public servant both for the purpose of act, 1987 and act, 2006.26. now turning to next ground of challenge, which has been projected about failure of prosecution to obtain sanction for launching prosecution against the petitioner. ..... of criminal procedure, 1989, be charged at the same trial. the special judge anti-corruption thus gets jurisdiction to try the accused for commission of offence under act of 1987 as well. the said purposive interpretation requires to be placed on the said provisions as the laws are enacted and institutions created for the benefit of ..... destructive of each other, however, fall to ground lock, stock and barrel for the following reasons and on the following legal grounds.21. section 10 of the act, 1987 mandates that every person in the engagement of conducting of examination shall be deemed to be public servant, within the meaning of section 21 of rpc. the .....

Balbir Singh Vs. State and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... would be murder punishable under section 302 rpc, as explained in illustration (d) appearing under section 300 of the rpc.28. appellant's counsel's submission that appellant's act would amount to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, is, in view of the above discussion, held unsustainable, and is, accordingly, rejected. the judgment cited by the ..... amounting to murder is a question of fact.26. perusal of the provisions of the rpc, extracted hereinabove, leave no manner of doubt that the appellant's act of firing six shots from his loaded slr on his platoon commander and constable p.a.naidu, injuring their vitals including cranium, as a result whereof the brain ..... been brought forth though the child may not have breathed or been completely born.300. murderexcept in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or--- secondly-if it is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury .....

Syed Waseem Yaqoob and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2010J& K22

..... but the nominations as reflected in para 18 of the record has been made on the recommendations of ministers/mlas/mlcs and party functionaries of almost all political parties, such act on the face of it offends safeguards contained in the constitution and such action cannot be sustained in law. the government has rightly withdrawn the communication dated 27-6-08 ..... the governor but is the satisfaction in the constitutional sense under the cabinet system of the government of the council of ministers headed by chief minister. the executive is to act subject to control of the legislature. the executive power of the state is vested in the governor as head of the executive. the real executive power however, is vested in .....

Priyanka Overseas Pvt Ltd. Vs. J. and K. Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2010CriLJ65

..... as under:place of inquiry or trial where scene of offence is uncertain or not in one district only; or where offence is continuing, or consists of several acts.when it is uncertain in which of several local areas an offence was committed, orwhere an offence is committed partly in one local area and partly in another; ..... cognizance of offence and issued process against the petitioners for allegedly and having committed the offence under section 138/142 of the act of 1881.5. the petitioners, thereafter, challenged the proceedings pending on the files of ld. c.j.m. srinagar in two separate petitions before this court on ..... court of delhi. in the said reply the factum of issuance of the notice was admitted. the respondent no. 1 accordingly filed the complaint under section 138 of the act of 1881 in the court of ld. c.j.m. srinagar, which court after applying mind to the allegations contained in the complaint and statement of complainant, took .....

Tsering Angchuk Vs. State J. and K.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2010CriLJ799

..... as noticed on the person of the prosecutrix by the lady doctor go to show that the accused had assaulted or used criminal force on her knowingly that by that act he was likely to outrage her modesty. entering into the house of the prosecutrix in the absence of her husband also attributes intention of the accused to commit this mischief ..... by the accused from the back and dragged to the room for tethering the animals. the accused had slapped her and made her to fall and thereafter he did bad act with her. she came out of the room and raised noise, when p.w. sewang dolma reached there and she was informed about the incident by her. lamberdar of the .....