Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 26 unbecoming conduct Sorted by: old Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 116 results (0.273 seconds)

Nagarmal Vs. the State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1584

..... j.1. petitioner has been detained under the orders of district magistrate, jammu dt. june 30, 1986 under section 8 of the j & k public safety act, 1978 (for short act hereafter). the grounds on which detention has been ordered have been enumerated in the grounds of detention as under:on 20-2-1985 you motivated one buta s/o ..... and on this ground the order of detention requires to be quashed learned additional advocate-general has, however, contended that the government is fully authorised under the act to order continued detention of a detenu for a period of 24 months and considering the activities of the petitioner prejudicial to the security of the state his ..... consideration confirmed the continued detention of the detenu for a period of 24 months.4. admittedly the district magistrate while passing the order under section 8 of the act had detained the petitioner for a period of 12 months. the government while confirming that order has raised the period from 12 months to 24 months. no reason .....

Krishan Lal and anr. Vs. Dhani Ram and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ497

..... suit. it is not the case of the plaintiff that the tehsildar had no authority to authenticate the agreement. such a suit is expressly barred under section 25 of the act which reads as under: -'25. bar of jurisdiction of civil court-notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force -(a) no civil court shall have ..... of may 1973, such ex-owner and such ex-intermediary jointly, and the prospective owner of such land by an agreement in writing, duly registered under the j&k; registration act, 1977 or authenticated by a revenue officer of a class not lower than a tehsildar: -(a) respectively acknowledge receipt and payment of an agreed amount; and/or(b) admit ..... the learned court passed the following order on 16.07.1996:-'1. whether the suit is not maintainable as it is barred by section 12 and 25 of agrarian reforms act opd.2. whether the cause of action has accrued to the plaintiff against the defendant opp3. whether the suit is not properly verified and if so, what is the .....

Tilak Raj and ors. Vs. Jandk Housing Board and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2003(2)JKJ497

..... fall within the definition of workman;(ix) that even in the case of employee who is working with a contractor under the contract labour (regulations and abolition) act, 1970, direction can he given to the principal employer to bring the employee on its rolls; (x) that even in the case of seasonal employee, direction ..... -- the. government may by, notification in the government. gazette and subject to the condition of previous publication, make rules, for carrying out the purposes of this act.60(1)(c). regulations --the remuneration and conditions of service under section 7;66. government's powers to give directions to board. the government may give the board ..... submitted that the board may from time to time and with the previous sanction of the government, make regulations, which are consistent with the provisions of the act. it is submitted that section 60(c) specifically deals with the remuneration and conditions of service as visualised under section 7. reference is also being made to .....

Shri Sarang Bani and ors. Vs. Sh. Rajinder Singh and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ463

..... (1995)1scc187 the appellants no. 1 and 5 died. no application was made to bring on record the legal representatives within the statutory period prescribed by limitation act. the court observed as under:'... admittedly, no applications had been made to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased appellants 1 and 5 from the respective ..... also the written statement of the defendant/respondent rajinder singh. his specific submission is unless the evidence is proved in terms of section 145 of the evidence act it should not have been relied upon and considered.8. in appreciating his submissions, it is obligatory upon him in law to make out convincing and ..... 4 cpc seeking to bring him on record as legal representative of the deceased-appellant. along with this application, an application under section 5 of the limitation act was also filed, seeking to condone the delay in approaching the court. it was resisted by the respondent rajinder singh. the learned single judge after hearing .....

Bhomesh Sharma Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(1)JKJ84

..... to the directions of learned special judge anti corruption, the vigilance organization registered fir no. 4/2006 for commission of the offences under section 5(2) of prevention of corruption act read with section 120(b) rpc and started investigation of the case.6. it may be pointed out here that as per the information provided through application to the learned ..... may bring it to the kind notice of hon'ble court that case fir no. 20/2005 under section 5(1) e read with section 5(2) p. c. act svt. 2006 was registered with p/s vigilance organization, jammu on december 06, 2005. the searches including that of the house of accused bhumesh sharma and others were conducted on ..... of the accused bhumesh sharma and others on 07/08-12-2005 in case fir no. 20/2005 under section 5(1) (e) read with section 5(2) p. c. act svt. 2006 registered with police station vigilance organization, jammu were missing.on my arrival at jammu, i called insp. nissar hussain shah no. 49/svo (investigating officer) to my .....

Mohd. Bashir and ors. Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... there does not exist any material on the records on the basis whereof it could be said that the petitioners had committed the alleged offence while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of their official duties. learned sessions judge has detailed the material collected by the investigating agency during the currency of the investigation, ..... counsel in respect of sanction under section 197 cr.p.c., the accused persons had come forward with a written plea that they committed the offence while acting or purporting to act in discharge of their duties. thus, these judgments are of no assistance to the accused no. 3. the accused no. 3 has claimed the protection ..... suggest that accused no. 3 has misused his official position. had the accused come forward with an application that he really killed the deceased but while acting and purporting to act in discharge of his duties the situation would have been otherwise. the court is not award that what will be the defence adopted by the accused .....

Mohammad Maqbool Beigh Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ106

..... activities are highly prejudicial to the maintenance of the security of the state. under such compelling circumstances, it has become imperative to detain you under public safety act, 1978 for which orders are being issued separately.5. perusal of the record would show that the grounds of detention is a verbatim copy of the dossier ..... which are highlighted in the grounds of detention were prejudicial to the security of the state as such the detenue was detained under the provisions of public safety act. respondents have further stated that the grounds of detention are precise, proximate, pertinent and relevant and that there is no vagueness or staleness as indicated by the ..... exemplary conduct for other politicians he has not conducted himself in any manner unbecoming of a responsible and law abiding citizen nor has he indulged in any act or omission made penal by the laws of the land for the time being inforce. the petitioner further alleges that the said detenue has been detained under .....

Gopal Dass Vs. State of J and K

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2651,2008(2)JKJ153

..... circumstances leading to such death. if a statement which otherwise is covered by the hearsay rule does not fall within the exceptions of section 32 of the evidence act, the same cannot be relied upon for finding the guilt of the accused.22. the evidence of the aforementioned witnesses, being inadmissible in evidence, has thus ..... of the code of criminal procedure. this omission would, therefore, partake the character of a major contradiction. resultantly, presumption under section 114-c of the evidence act cannot be drawn against the appellant to presume that because the death had taken place within seven years of the marriage, so the appellant had to be presumed ..... saying that the findings are not supported by reliable evidence and are even otherwise bad in law based on wrong interpretation of section 114-c of the evidence act.6. learned state counsel, on the other hand, supports the judgment and order of learned sessions judge urging that there was sufficient evidence against the appellant .....

Nivedata Vs. State and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(1)JKJ15

..... is just washed away; the state would still get an opportunity to cross-examine her in case she does not support the case of the prosecution; the court can even act upon the statement of a hostile witness and, therefore, all the situations are still open before the court and it cannot be just said that once the petitioner is re .....

National Insurance Co. Vs. Muna Ram and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2010ACJ162,2008(2)JKJ612

..... we are not oblivious of the distinction between the statutory liability of the insurance company vis-'-vis a third party in the context of sections 147 and 149 of the act and its liabilities in other cases. but the same liabilities arising under a contract of insurance would have to be met if the contract is valid. if the contract of ..... compensation; and (ii) liability. it is beaten law of the land that insurer cannot challenge the quantum of compensation in view of the mandate of section 149 of motor vehicles act. however, it can defend the claim petition on other grounds provided permission is sought and granted in terms of mandate of section 170 of the motor vehicles ..... act, but no such permission was sought. thus, it cannot challenge the quantum of compensation.9. in order to avoid liability, insurer has to prove and plead that the cheque .....