Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 129 transmission of proceedings of summary force court Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 319 results (0.113 seconds)

Aug 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Anjanamma .n Vs. N Manjunath

Court : Karnataka

..... sons annayappa and hanumaiah. but, the suit is hit by limitation as per section 3 read with articles 110 and 113 of the schedule to the limitation act, 1963 ( limitation act for brevity). in this regard, it was contended that the appellant/plaintiff was excluded from the schedule properties by defendant no.1. that, as a result ..... , the same has to be established by concrete evidence on record. e) as far as alienation by the manager for the benefit of the estate is concerned, in bal mukand vs. kamla wati, [air1964sc1385, it was held by the hon ble supreme court that for a transaction to be regarded as for the benefit of the family, ..... learned counsel for the respective parties, the following points would arise for our consideration: 1. having regard to articles 110 and 113 of the schedule to the limitation act, whether the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties is maintainable?.2. (i) whether the alienation of suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Prameela Vs. Smt. Anjanamma N

Court : Karnataka

..... sons annayappa and hanumaiah. but, the suit is hit by limitation as per section 3 read with articles 110 and 113 of the schedule to the limitation act, 1963 ( limitation act for brevity). in this regard, it was contended that the appellant/plaintiff was excluded from the schedule properties by defendant no.1. that, as a result ..... , the same has to be established by concrete evidence on record. e) as far as alienation by the manager for the benefit of the estate is concerned, in bal mukand vs. kamla wati, [air1964sc1385, it was held by the hon ble supreme court that for a transaction to be regarded as for the benefit of the family, ..... learned counsel for the respective parties, the following points would arise for our consideration: 1. having regard to articles 110 and 113 of the schedule to the limitation act, whether the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties is maintainable?.2. (i) whether the alienation of suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2021 (HC)

Sri N. Manjunath Vs. Smt. Anjanamma N

Court : Karnataka

..... sons annayappa and hanumaiah. but, the suit is hit by limitation as per section 3 read with articles 110 and 113 of the schedule to the limitation act, 1963 ( limitation act for brevity). in this regard, it was contended that the appellant/plaintiff was excluded from the schedule properties by defendant no.1. that, as a result ..... , the same has to be established by concrete evidence on record. e) as far as alienation by the manager for the benefit of the estate is concerned, in bal mukand vs. kamla wati, [air1964sc1385, it was held by the hon ble supreme court that for a transaction to be regarded as for the benefit of the family, ..... learned counsel for the respective parties, the following points would arise for our consideration: 1. having regard to articles 110 and 113 of the schedule to the limitation act, whether the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties is maintainable?.2. (i) whether the alienation of suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2015 (HC)

Dr D Pavan Kumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... by rendering service in rural/tribal areas, they can capture -:46. :- better prospects of earning higher professional qualifications and consequently eligibility for promotion, acts as a motivating factor and provides incentive to young in-service doctors to opt for service in rural/tribal areas. therefore, assigning weightage to rural ..... the entrance test was held in terms of regulation 9 of the post graduate medical education regulations, 2000, made under section 20 of the indian medical council act, 1956, by the central government.-.:48. :- under that regulation, a single eligibility cum entrance examination namely, national eligibility cum- entrance test for post ..... . sarat chandra & ors (1990 (2) scc669. in that decision, it was held that the word selection must be understood not only the final act of selecting candidates with preparation of the list for appointment, but the selection process consists of various steps such as inviting applications, scrutiny of applications, rejection .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2011 (HC)

P. Lalithamma and Others Vs. the Commissioner, Bangalore City Corporat ...

Court : Karnataka

..... same has been registered in crime no.74 of 2003 for the offence punishable under sec.338 and 304 (a) of ipc and under sec.272 and 437 of forest act against the officials of the respondent. in the complaint it is clearly stated that the tree was infected and though representation was given no steps have been taken by the ..... (this writ appeal is filed u/s 4 of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.46526/2003 dated 15/12/2005) 1. this appeal is filed by the unsuccessful writ petitioners in w. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2012 (HC)

B.S. Yeddyurappa Vs. the Lokayukta of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... others ((1985) 3 scc 545) on the point that procedure established by law must be reasonable, just and fair. authority exercising statutory power must act reasonably, otherwise the procedure prescribed by the statute itself would be deemed to be un-reasonable and violative of article 21 of the constitution on the ..... the persons concerned;(xxvii) that the lokayukta, while dealing with chapter-22, recommended prosecution of the petitioner under the provisions of prevention of corruption act, 1988 and having regard to the position of the petitioner as chief minister, the recommendation must be construed to be a recommendation of removal;(xxviii ..... office or otherwise state, its instrumentalities or state owned companies/corporation or other bodies and authorities, either in collusion with private parties or otherwise for various acts of omission and commission leading to various illegalities, irregularities, events and executive decisions set out in clauses (i) to (viii) and also pertaining to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2017 (HC)

B. Athaulla Khan and Others Vs. State Of Karnataka, by its Principal S ...

Court : Karnataka

..... p. and others reported in air 1986 sc 319 whereunder it has been held that where a route is nationalized under chapter vi-a of the act (mv act, 1939), scheme totally prohibit private operators from plying stage carriages on route. it is also held that such private operator cannot ply on part of ..... parliamentary affairs or the secretary to government, transport department authorized by the minister concerned would be the authority to hear the objections under section 100 of the act. 13. sri. p.r.ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent / corporation has contended that petitioners have been operating their services based on illegal ..... karnataka state transport appellate tribunal, bangalore orders are under challenge: (second set) table historical background: 2. in exercise of the power vested under section 68d of mv act, 1939 state government approved certain schemes during 1960, 1961, 1968 and on various other dates which are known and called as "bts scheme, bellary scheme, kolar .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2017 (HC)

Sri F J M Crasta Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the request for interest on the ground that there are no rules for giving interest on the belated sanction of pensionary benefits invoking provision of section 87 of the education act, which is clear that rules for retirement of an employee shall be same as government institutions. therefore, the petitioner is before this court for the relief sought for.6. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2021 (HC)

Smt.jaywanthi K Kapadia Vs. Mr Dhansukhlal Venilal

Court : Karnataka

..... died 23 in the year 1999. he would further submit to this court that since succession opened much prior to amendment to section 6a of the hindu succession act, the plaintiff cannot maintain the present suit seeking her legitimate share in the suit schedule properties.13. learned counsel would vehemently argue and contend before this court ..... 30 under section 8 but took the share under section 6 by way of survivorship. if he has received the ancestral properties under section 6 of the hindu succession act, 1956, then venilal would not acquire absolute right since it is a co-parcenery properties. the contention of the defendants that schedule 'a', 'b' and 'd ..... that father coparcener should be living as on 9.9.2005. (iv) the statutory fiction of partition created by proviso to section 6 of the hindu succession act, 1956 as originally enacted did not bring about the actual partition or disruption of coparcenary. the fiction was only for the purpose of ascertaining share of deceased coparcener .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2022 (HC)

Prathap Kumar G Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... prove how the accident occurred. the courts have also applied the principle of res ipsa loquitur in cases where no direct evidence was brought on record. the act itself contains a provision which concerns with the consequences of driving dangerously alike the provision in ipc that the vehicle is driven in a manner dangerous to public ..... families, criminal courts cannot treat the nature of the offence under section 304-a ipc as attracting the benevolent provisions of section 4 of the probation of offenders act. while considering the quantum of sentence to be imposed for the offence of causing death by rash or negligent driving of automobiles, one of the prime considerations ..... .21/2018 of respondent vijayanagar police registered on the basis - 2 - crl.p no.1133 of 2019 of offences punishable under section134a & b) and187of motor vehicles act and section279 428 and429of ipc, which is pending on the file of hon ble metropolitan magistrate traffic court-ii, at bengaluru in c.c.no.5016/2018. this .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //