Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 129 transmission of proceedings of summary force court Page 1 of about 449 results (0.213 seconds)

Union of India and Ors vs.sunil Kumar

Court : Delhi

..... (capf) in 2001 and was placed under the administrative control of ministry of home affairs (mha). later, on 20.12.2007, sashastra w.p.(c) 940/2016 page 1 of 5 seema bal act was passed by parliament. on 01.02.2005, mha by an office memorandum purported to combatize various posts including those in the military ..... cadre of sashastra seema bal (ssb). the relevant extracts of that order are as follows :3. 2. on combatisation, the afore-mentioned medical officers will ..... to what was directed in respect of the petitioners in kolkata and allahabad high courts. the petitioner was directed to be kept at the concerned position jw school, sashastra seema bal, gwaldam (uttarakhand).6. mr. bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of union of india contended that once all posts stood combatized and the applicant s position .....

Sujan Singh, Bangalore Vs. Government of India Ministry of Home Affair ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... . it is not in dispute that the applicant belongs to combatized cadre of sashastra seema bal and, therefore, governed by the provisions of sashastra seema bal act, 2007 (in short, ssb act, 2007) and rules, 2009 framed under the aforesaid act. section 3 of the ssb act, 2007 provides that officers and subordinate officers and under officers and other persons ..... enrolled under the act shall be subject to the provisions of this act and the rules. rule 8 ..... that the assistant commandant is at serial no.(viii) of the list of officers. section 4 of ssb act, 2007 provides that there shall be an armed force of the union called the sashastra seema bal for ensuring the security of the borders of india and performing such other duties as may be entrusted to .....

Jahid Ali vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... india, the petitioner impugns the order dated 24.12.2014 passed by the commandant (medical), mtc, sashastra seema bal, shimla dismissing the petitioner from service having found him guilty of an offence under section 43 of sashastra seema bal act, 2007. the petitioner further challenges the order dated 08.09.2015 vide which his wp(c) 11182 ..... /2015 page 1 appeal against the same was dismissed by inspector general (personnel).2. the petitioner aged about 29 years was appointed as constable (nursing orderly) in sashastra seema bal (hereinafter referred to ..... officer. dr.x was a superior officer of the petitioner and deserved all respect.... petitioner s conduct, especially in context of armed forces was an act of gross indiscipline.16. the conduct of the petitioner was therefore clearly prejudicial to good order and the discipline of the force. even if there .....

Vinod Kumar Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)112PLR325

..... thus, remains to be decided is what this court should do in these circumstances. counsel for the families of victims though had contended that proceedings under the contempt of courts act be initiated against sh. s.s. saini and also mr. anupam gupta, advocate who has filed affidavit in support of the application, but i do not propose to pass ..... time and again the apex court had noticed that protection guaranteed to the citizens of india under article 21 of the constitution of india is being rendered negatory by indiscriminate acts of the police. my lord, the chief justice of india in inder singh v. state of punjab, (1995) 3 scc 702, has observed ' this court has in recent ..... allegation no.(i) and causing harassment to the members of walia family (as discussed in allegation no.ii), it would not be un-reasonable to conclude that he had acted in furtherance of a larger design. the fact that high court had issued show-cause notice to him for contempt of court alongwith shri ss saini is also a .....

Kore Raju vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

..... petition has been dismissed.2. the appellant filed an application for compensation before the railway claims tribunal on the ground that he was working as a constable with sashastra seema bal and posted at rangia, assam; he took leave from 29th june, 2009 and went to his village in warangal district; he was returning after leave from warangal ..... case would be to pay compensation, but the extent of such compensation is as may be prescribed which means prescribed by the rules made under the act. section 129 of the act empowered the central government to make such rules.17. the railway accident compensation rules 1990 (for short the rules) were made by the central government ..... and fix such amount. it is for the said reason that parliament left it to the government to discharge that function. sections 124 and 124-a of the act speak the same language that the railway administration shall be liable to pay compensation . as pointed above, it is the liability of the railway administration to pay .....

Atma Prakash Dixit Sfa (M), Office of the Inspector General and Others ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... j) applicants in this joint original application are serving as senior field assistants(m) [ sfas(m) for short] and assistant field officers(m) [ afos(m) for short] in sashastra seema bal ( ssb for short) under the ministry of home affairs. they are aggrieved by the alleged illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the respondents in not giving them ..... . the operative part of the said order reads as under:- shri atma prakash dixist and others have filed this original application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking direction to be issued to the respondents to grant them higher grade pay of rs.2800 w.e.f. 01.01.2006 with all consequential benefits ..... also they were granted the same pay scale at par with others but lesser grade pay. 13. we are, therefore, of the considered view that the respondents have acted in violation of articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india in granting lesser grade pay to the sfa, afo, fo etc. of ssb from sfa, afo, .....

Vivek Kumar and Ors Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... sashastra seema bal in the year 2004 and is governed by _______________________________________________________________________ eponymous act of 2007. the petitioners are serving as constables (gd). they were appointed through the general competitive examination and are serving in various battalions of the ..... . they submit that the respondents ought to conform to standards or norms which are not arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant.2. the petitioners case is that they were constables (gd) in sashastra seema bal -respondent no.2. it is stated that this organization by the name of special service bureau (ssb) was raised in the year 1963 and subsequently, came to be known as .....

Mukesh Rao and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... sashastra seema bal in the year 2004 and is governed by _______________________________________________________________________ eponymous act of 2007. the petitioners are serving as constables (gd). they were appointed through the general competitive examination and are serving in various battalions of the ..... . they submit that the respondents ought to conform to standards or norms which are not arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant.2. the petitioners case is that they were constables (gd) in sashastra seema bal -respondent no.2. it is stated that this organization by the name of special service bureau (ssb) was raised in the year 1963 and subsequently, came to be known as .....

Yogesh Ray and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... sashastra seema bal in the year 2004 and is governed by _______________________________________________________________________ eponymous act of 2007. the petitioners are serving as constables (gd). they were appointed through the general competitive examination and are serving in various battalions of the ..... . they submit that the respondents ought to conform to standards or norms which are not arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant.2. the petitioners case is that they were constables (gd) in sashastra seema bal -respondent no.2. it is stated that this organization by the name of special service bureau (ssb) was raised in the year 1963 and subsequently, came to be known as .....

Sushil Kumar and Ors Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... sashastra seema bal in the year 2004 and is governed by _______________________________________________________________________ eponymous act of 2007. the petitioners are serving as constables (gd). they were appointed through the general competitive examination and are serving in various battalions of the ..... . they submit that the respondents ought to conform to standards or norms which are not arbitrary, irrational or irrelevant.2. the petitioners case is that they were constables (gd) in sashastra seema bal -respondent no.2. it is stated that this organization by the name of special service bureau (ssb) was raised in the year 1963 and subsequently, came to be known as .....