Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 129 transmission of proceedings of summary force court Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 319 results (0.221 seconds)

Mar 07 1983 (HC)

Basavalingamma (by L. R.'s) and Ors. Vs. Sharadamma

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1984Kant27; 1983(2)KarLJ20

..... i thereto will further the legislative intent in regard to the enlargement of the share of female heirs, qualitatively and quantitatively. the hindu law of inheritance (amendment act , 1929, conferred heirship rights on the son's daughter, daughter's daughter and sister in all areas where the mithakshara law prevailed. s. 3 of the ..... female relative, the interest of the deceased in the mitakshara coparcenary property shall devolve by testamentary of intestate succession, as the case may be, under this act and not by survivorship.explation-2: nothing contained in the proviso to this section shall be construed as enabling a person who has separated himself from the ..... in a mitakshara coparcenary property, his interest this the property shall devolve by survive upon the surviving members of the coparcenaries and not in accordance with this act.provided that, if the deceased had left him surviving a female relative specified in class i of the schedule or a male relative, specified in that class .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1985 (HC)

T.S. Natraj Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1985)48CTR(Kar)88; ILR1985KAR1543; [1985]155ITR81(KAR); [1985]155ITR81(Karn)

..... . 4. brief particulars of expenditure on entertainment, adevertisement, guest house, etc., and the amount, if any, disallowable under section 37 of the income-tax act, 1961. 5. particulars of expenses in respect of which payments have been made to directors, partners or persons substantially interested in the concern and their relatives ..... by the institute of chartered accountants of india (institute) established and functioning from july 1, 1949, under the chartered accountants act of 1949 (central act no. 38 of 1949) ('ca act'). as the said exclusive right or privilege conferred on cas has affected their interests, the petitioners have challenged the said provisions ..... these advocates prepare the returns of their clients-tax payers-file them and then represent them before the original, appellate and revisional authorities under the act. some of the advocates, though they do not possess qualifications of degree or diploma in commerce, have gained necessary experience in the preparation and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1985 (HC)

B. Satyanarayana Singh Vs. Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribuna ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR395

..... the application. the ksrtc participated in the proceedings objected to the application, but did not file any application for grant of permit under section 68f(1a) of the act, until it was granted to the petitioner. even to this day, no such application is filed. therefore, the question for consideration is whether in a case ..... commissioner for transport, gulbarga establishes the need for the grant of temporary permit applied for by she applicant under section 65f(1-c) of the motor vehicle act. this authority therefore resolves to accept the aged for grant of temporary permit. as regards the objection raised on behalf of the general manager, k.s.r ..... ksta called for the report from the deputy commissioner for transport for gulbarga division, gulbarga for grant of a stage carnage permit under section 68f(1c) of the act, on the route vaddarahatti to kampli. the deputy commissioner for transport, gulbarga division, gulbarga submitted his report as per annexure-b. the report is a detailed one .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1989 (HC)

Srikanta Datta Narasimharaja Wadiyar Vs. Sri Venkateswara Real Estate ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas211(Kar)

..... by the petitioner. the other clauses relate to the mutual obligations between the parties primarily depending on the exemption to be obtained from the provisions of the ceiling act. as the matter stands now, the petitioner, instead of pursuing his efforts to obtain exemption has, by his petition, dated january 9, 1985, effectively ..... restraining them from implementing or otherwise giving effect to the resolutions passed on december 26, 1973, and for grant of an injunction against the defendants therein from acting as directors. in those suits, late highness, as the eighth defendant, was represented by counsel. in the written statement filed by him, he has stated ..... exemption of schedule b property plus 35 (thirty-five) acres being portion of schedule a property from the restrictive provisions of the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976, at his own expense. 2. the second party (chamaraju group), herein agrees and undertakes to transfer all the shares, right title and interest which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 08 1989 (HC)

S. Vasudeva and Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR39

..... a very important place in the city of bangalore. the land held in excess to the ceiling limit has to be used for the purposes of the act. the act not only provides for imposition of ceiling on vacant land in urban agglomeration, it also provides for the acquisition of such land in excess of ceiling ..... to conspicuous consumption of scarce building materials and to ensure the equitable utilisation of such materials; andiv) to secure orderly urbanisation. in addition to this, the act provides for following matters which were also listed in the statement of objects and reasons:i) imposition of a ceiling on both ownership and possession of vacant land ..... submitted an application before the special deputy commissioner, urban land ceiling, enclosing a copy of the application made before the 2nd respondent under section 20 of the act and also submitted the papers and the statements to substantiate the case that the partners of the 4th respondent-firm are suffering from undue hardship due to huge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1989 (HC)

Capt. M.V. Subbarayappa Vs. Bharat Electronics Employees Co-operative ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR390; 1990(3)KarLJ520

..... be excluded. petitioner has also further contended that the biological and chemical hazards will cause constant nuisance and will also offend the provisions of the public health act. therefore, the place chosen for installation of sewerage treatment plant is not at all suitable from the point of view of health of the residents of the ..... question for installation of sewerage treatment plant does not contravene, or, is not contrary to, the definition of the expression 'civic amenity' as provided in the act.9. the next question for consideration is whether the location of the sewerage treatment plant in the civic amenity site in question is hazardous to the public health ..... to be an expert in the matter. when the third respondent, which is placed incharge of the prevention and control of water pollution under the pollution control act and has accorded approval and has also further got it examined through the officer concerned with the pollution control department, it is not possible to accept the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1991 (HC)

President, Poura Karmika Sangha Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR918; 1991(1)KarLJ424

..... karnataka civil services (revised pay) rules, 1976, which came into force on 1st january 1977. these rules were applicable to state government employees; therefore the state government by order no. hma 1173 mlr 76 dated 31st may 1976 accorded sanction for adopting the revised pay scales by the municipal corporations in the state subject to the condition that 'the pay of ..... 29-9-1980 and 18-11-1980 the pay of the staff of this office is refixed in accordance with the iind schedule sanctioned by the government under order no. hma 1173 mir 76 dated 20-7-1977. they should draw their pay and allowance as shown in the enclosure less already drawn subject to audit. they should give an undertaking .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 08 1991 (HC)

B. Umesh Vs. Bangalore Development Authority

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR824

..... although the said section is not in terms applicable to the present acquisition proceedings, we are of the view that the above provision in the delhi development act contains a wholesome principle which should be followed by all development authorities throughout the country when they acquire large tracts of land for the purposes of land development ..... exercise of such powers as are actually conferred by, or may reasonably be deduced from, the language of the statute. thus a company incorporated under the companies act is bound by the objects listed in its memorandum of association, for it is incorporated for the purposes set out in the memorandum. the company can make ..... in rasal bai v. bangalore development authority, : ilr1989kar2299 held as follows:'the lands were acquired by the state government under the relevant provisions of the bda act and not by the bda. the proceedings for acquiring these lands could be dropped only by the state government and not by the bda. under the scheme of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1991 (HC)

Sarala Shetty Vs. Ramakrishnayya

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3630; 1992(1)KarLJ89

..... and extent of proof that is required in order to prove sub-letting has been considered with reference to the provisions of section 13 of east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949. it is observed in the said decision that while considering the nature of initial onus thrown on the landlord to prove sub-letting, the courts must not ..... or strained as to make it impossible or extremely difficult for the landlord to get a decree for eviction. such a course would defeat the very purpose of the act which affords the facility of eviction of the tenant to the landlord on certain specified grounds. this appears to us to be the general scheme of all the rent ..... the finding recorded by the trial court that a single eviction petition was maintainable does not call for interference in this revision petition filed under section 50(1) of the act. by way of reply, sri b.v. acharya, submitted that the explanation that rents for the ground floor and the first floor were fixed separately and were received as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 28 1991 (HC)

Mrs. Behroze Ramyar Batha Vs. Special Land Acquisition Officer

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3556; 1992(1)KarLJ589

..... mr. dhanuka, learned counsel for the appellants, that in the event the other awardees who were awarded paltry sums by the award under section 11 land acquisition act, do not refund sums withdrawn, the appellants are prepared to refund and/or deposit the said sums. therefore, we conclude that on the ground of delay the ..... lands have accepted the compensation because in industrial development & investment co. pvt. ltd. v. state of maharashtra it is stated thus:'...the state itself which has acted illegally and without jurisdiction cannot plead that it should be allowed to retain the sum awarded in its favour by the land acquisition officer. respondent 5 who is ..... in the village chawadi. on 14-5-1982 copies of the said notification were served on the appellants. thereafter the statutory enquiry under section 5a of the act was held. the advocate appeared on behalf of the objectors and put forth several objections. those objections were overruled. thereafter section 5a enquiry report was sent on .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //