Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Page 87 of about 4,850 results (0.237 seconds)

Mar 15 1997 (HC)

Jaswant Rai JaIn Vs. Surinderpal Singh Bhuttal and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)116PLR121

..... same would lead to the conclusion that the landlord had failed to make out the basic ingredient of section 13-a of the act so as to enable him to seek eviction by summary proceeding.4. the high court vide its order dated 28-11-1995 ..... for sale of the house and rejected the application of the respondent-tenant rakesh jain under section 18-a(4) of the act seeking leave to contest the eviction petition filed by the landlord on 30-9-95 by holding that no ground for granting the ..... the meaning of section 2(hh) so as to entitle him to make an application for eviction under section 13-a of the act. respondent-rakesh jain further stated*that in fact col. surinder pal singh bhuttal wanted to enhance the rent to rs. 15,000/- ..... chandigarh rejecting the application of the tenant filed under section 18-a(4) of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 (hereinafter called the 'the act') seeking leave to defend the eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord. this order dated 28-11-1995 of the high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1999 (HC)

Brij Lal Bishnoi Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)125PLR323

..... the court held as under :-' because of the availability of the said genuine and bona fide agreement to sell pertaining to the very land acquired under the l.a. act which reflected the real market value of the acquired land at about the time of acquisition, i.e. november 2, 1978, there was no scope for determining the ..... per acre.5. the claimants completely felt dissatisfied with the extent of the amount awarded for acquisition of their respective lands and preferred references under section 18 of the act, which were forwarded to the learned district judge, hisar, in accordance with law. the learned additional district judge, hisar vide his award dated 2.2.1998 maintained ..... corrigendum was issued and the state intended to acquire 429.75 acres of land in hadbast no. 146. tehsil and district hissar. notification under section 6 of the act was issued on 18.3.1992. this land was acquired for development and utilisation of land for residential purpose for section 16 and parts of sectors 11, 13, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1992 (HC)

Moti Lal Gaur Vs. Amrit Lal Chauhan

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1992)102PLR651

..... which after considering various judgment came to the conclusion that even one of the many co landlords can singly maintain an application for ejectment against his tenant under the act. the learned counsel for the respondent, however, contends that it was incumbent upon the petitioner to have impleaded balkrishan and his sister pren as co-petitioner or, ..... one room, kitchen-cum-store, common v]arandah and a courtyard. the petitioner further stated that other co-owners of house no. 185, namely, his brother bal krishan and sister prem, have consented to the filing of the present petition.3. the respondent put in appearance and sought permission of the court to contest the ..... that the house bearing no. 185--subjecc matter of the eviction application-was earlier owned by his father sh. piyare lal. on his death, lie, his brother bal krishan and his sister prem have inherited the property. it was further stated that presently the petitioner and his brother are in possession of one room, one store .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2005 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : I(2006)DMC466

..... , i.p.c. had been fulfilled by the prosecution, the onus to prove his innocence had then shifted to the appellant as per section 113-b of the indian evidence act. the two defence witnesses brought before the court, by the appellant namely dw-1 surinder mohan and dw-2 jagdish chand belong to the village of the appellant. they have ..... should have been subjected to cruelty, have not been proved. the case, if any, against the appellant would fall within the ambit of section 113-b of the indian evidence act, 1872 and at the most, the appellant could be convicted under section 306, i.p.c. the alleged demand for scooter as per the prosecution was being made by all ..... , pw-6 madan lal and pw-7 inspector hari ram.7. learned counsel for the appellant has stated that before a presumption under section 113-b of the indian evidence act, 1872 could be taken into consideration, it was incumbent upon the prosecution to prove that the case fell within the ambit of section 304-b, i.p.c. onus of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1998 (HC)

State of Haryana and anr. Vs. Jagir Kaur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1999)122PLR259

..... provisions under the act itself. this legislation acts more as a linch-pin to the wheel of progress and development of different areas through the government or its instrumentalities for larger interests of the ..... , location and utility of the acquired land.22. determination of fair market value of the land on the date of notification under section 4 of the act is the relevant date for determining the amount of compensation payable to the claimants as subsequent interest thereto of the, claimants is safe guarded by the statutory ..... of village sounda and land measuring 44.45 acres in revenue estate of village jandli in district ambala. in furtherance thereto notification under section 8 of the act was issued on 10.1.1990 and the government actually acquired the entire land except 0.15 marlas, which was a result of arithmetical measurement mistake. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 2009 (HC)

Gawritex Industries Limited Vs. Sqn. Ldr. Gurdial Singh (Retd.) and or ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2010)157PLR95

..... stated in the reply as under:so, in view of the facts and circumstances detailed in present reply, you are advised to desist from doing any of the acts as stipulated in the present notice dated 19.07.2004 failing which you would render yourself liable for all the legal consequences thereof.thereafter, sensing the intention of the ..... there would be hardly any justification for the rent controller to frame an assessment order in pursuance to the provisions of proviso of section 13(2)(1) of the act as interpreted by the supreme court in the case of rakesh wadhawan (supra). after the evidence has been led by the landlord showing the relationship of landlord tenant, ..... 2) rcr 561.3. thereafter, after 3-1/2 years of the petitioner-tenant having sent the notice dated 19.07.2004 under the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1974, a rent petition was filed by the respondent-landlord. the petitioner-tenant filed a detailed reply, stating in para 6 of the preliminary objections that the premises .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2007 (HC)

Gurbachan Singh Jaggi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(P& H)658

..... taxable income as rs. 33,79,532 instead of rs. 1,16,460 mentioned in the return which was initially filed and processed under section 143(1)(a) of the act.3. on appeal to the cit(a), the additions made by the ao were deleted to the extent of rs. 27,92,685, including the addition of rs. 1,90 ..... /s g.s. traders. a search at his business and residential premises was carried on 17th dec., 1993 and accordingly notices under sections 142(1) and 143(2) of the act were issued calling upon the assessee appellant to furnish his reply. the (ac) after enquiry from the assessee completed the assessment vide order dt. 29th march, 1996. besides other discrepancies ..... m.m. kumar, j.1. this is assessee's appeal filed under section 260a of the it act, 1961 (for brevity, 'the act'), challenging order dt. 19th jan., 2007, passed by the income-tax appellate tribunal, amritsar bench, arnritsar (for brevity, 'the tribunal') in ita no. 147/asr/1997, in respect of asst. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2003 (HC)

Raj Rani Puri and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : III(2006)ACC107

..... been rejected by claims tribunal or the high court, the claimant does not challenge the same and allows the said judicial order to become final. the aforesaid amendment act shall be of no help to such claimant. the reason being that a judicial order saying that such petition of claim was barred by limitation has attained finality. ..... the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed:(1) whether the claim petition is within time? opp(2) whether the petitioners are estopped by their own act and conduct from filing or maintaining the present claim petition? opr(3) whether the accidental death of narinder rai puri took place due to rash and negligent driving of ..... of limitation was no longer available to the respondent union of india as sub-section (3) of section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 had been deleted by section 53 of the motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1994 which came into force on 14.11.1994. this argument has merit. it is thus evident that no limitation now remains .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2000 (SC)

Bhavesh D. Parish and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2000]101CompCas459(SC); 2000(3)CTC178; JT2000(6)SC604; 2000(4)SCALE616; (2000)5SCC471; [2000]Supp1SCR291; 2001(1)LC54(SC); (2000)3UPLBEC2140

..... by referring to the advertisements issued by various such bodies in the press. while upholding the constitutional validity of the prize chits and money circulation schemes (banning) act, 1978 (srinivasa enterprises v. union of india : [1981]1scr801 this hon'ble court pointed out that for saving the poor and unwary public from the unscrupulous ..... . this court in papnasan labour union v.s. madura coats limited and anr. : air1995sc2200 while considering challenge to section 25-m of the industrial disputes act, 1947 of being violative of article 19 of the constitution referred to earlier decisions of this court and at page 511 set out the following principles and ..... issue directions to non-banking institutions receiving deposits and to financial institutions. by amendment in 1963 a new chapter iii-b was inserted in the said act. this chapter inserted sections 45-h to 45-q which were provisions relating to non-banking institutions receiving deposits and financial institutions. in the statement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2000 (SC)

Kali Prasad and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2000(8)SC503; 2000(5)SCALE368; (2000)6SCC640; [2000]Supp1SCR702

..... of those sections are attracted here. the effect of section 1(2) is that the provisions would become part of 1952 act from its inception. it follows that respondents 3 and 4 acquired right to succession of bal karan.12. it is next contended that inasmuch as the civil suit was barred in view of the provisions of section 331 ..... another contention of mr. swarup is that sister's sons of bal karan became heirs only on the passing of the u.p. zamindari abolition & land reforms (amendment) act, 1958 and it cannot be given retrospective effect.10. the amendment act was passed in 1958. the question whether that act was retrospective in nature, was considered by a division bench of ..... , read with schedule ii of the u.p. zamindari act, any finding recorded by the civil court could not be taken note of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //