Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Page 100 of about 4,850 results (0.187 seconds)

Dec 22 2017 (HC)

Virender Singh vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... , 2017 coram: hon'ble mr. justice manmohan judgment manmohan, j: (oral) 1. present petition has been filed for grant of letters of administration under section 278 of the indian succession act, 1925 with respect to the estate of deceased sh. surender singh and late smt. soni rawat.2. it is stated that late shri surender singh and late smt. soni rawat .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2018 (HC)

Evolve Info Train India Pvt Ltd vs.versatile Commotrade Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... too in an application, it cannot in any manner whatsoever impact the rights and claims of the appellant which is also a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act, 1956.17. ld. counsel for the respondent no.1/plaintiff would submit that the respondent no.1/plaintiff had made a prayer in the application under order xxxviii ..... /s evolve info train india pvt. ltd. on 25.04.2014, after receipt of summons of the instant suit, is hit by section 53 of transfer of property act requiring interference by this hon ble court to safeguard interest of the plaintiff by attaching the above property. hence the present application for passing order under order 38 rule 5 ..... would try to sell the above land through its sister concern, m/s evolve info india pvt. ltd. so as to avoid section 53 of transfer of property act and to defeat or delay execution of the decree which is likely to be passed in favour of the plaintiff in the captioned suit, plaintiff had filed objection/application .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2018 (HC)

Institute of Cellular Therapies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs.union of India & An ...

Court : Delhi

..... these writ petitions can be disposed of based on the following directions: (i) the petitioners will file their application in form no.44 as prescribed under the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 and the extant rules and regulations. the application so filed will be processed in accordance with law by respondent no.2 as expeditiously as possible. (ii) respondent no.2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2018 (HC)

Institute of Cellular Therapies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs.union of India & An ...

Court : Delhi

..... these writ petitions can be disposed of based on the following directions: (i) the petitioners will file their application in form no.44 as prescribed under the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 and the extant rules and regulations. the application so filed will be processed in accordance with law by respondent no.2 as expeditiously as possible. (ii) respondent no.2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2018 (HC)

Davender Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... authority to whom the attestation form has been sent earlier failing which it will be deemed to be a suppression of factual information. further it is mentioned that if the act that false information has been furnished or that there has been suppression of any factual information in the attestation form comes to notice at any time during the service of ..... incident, he was in his childhood and not known about the police procedure. hence, he did not show the same at the time of recruitment. finally he is apologizing his act due to his lack of knowledge. 03. i have gone though the relevant documents and his representation no.130720010 const/dvr. devendra kumar was appointed in cisf as constable/dvr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2018 (HC)

Vijay Charlu vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... approach the second respondent/roc for having the name of tmsl removed from the register of companies by taking recourse to provisions of section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013 (2013 act).7. notably this provision i.e., section 248(2) would, ordinarily, apply only to a running company. this is also the submission of the counsel for the respondents. however .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 2018 (HC)

Sandesh Chhatwal vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... approach the second respondent/roc for having the name of tmsl removed from the register of companies by taking recourse to provisions of section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013 (2013 act).7. notably this provision i.e., section 248(2) would, ordinarily, apply only to a running company. this is also the submission of the counsel for the respondents. however .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2018 (HC)

Puneet Kumar vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... directives contained in harpreet singh batra & anr. will apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner. (iii) furthermore, the petitioner will take requisite steps, both under section 248(2) of the companies act, 2013 and the scheme within a period of four weeks from today. (iv) pending the request of the petitioner, the operation of the impugned list qua the petitioner will remain ..... the names of the two companies, referred to above, struck-off permanently from the register of companies by taking recourse to the provisions of section 248 (2) of the companies act, 2013.7. furthermore learned counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner would also like to avail the benefits of condonation of delay scheme, 2018 (in short the scheme ). in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2018 (HC)

Nikhil Bansal vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... from today for having the company s name voluntarily struck off from the register of companies with the roc in accordance with the provisions of section 248 (2) of companies act, 2013. likewise, the petitioner will also w.p. (c) 2274 /2018 page 2 of 3 take requisite steps, within the time frame stipulated above, in consonance with the provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 2018 (HC)

Sudhir Sehgal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... jurisdiction without making any preliminary enquiry as contemplated under section 340 cr.p.c. to proceed against late smt. asha sehgal and others?. vi. whether the learned court acted legally in exercise of its jurisdiction by passing the order dated 11th june, 2009 and filing a complaint under section 195 cr.p.c. without initiating any action against ..... meenakshi marwah and another, (2005) 4 scc370 the supreme court considered as to which of the two interpretations should be accepted keeping in view the scheme of the act and the object sought to be achieved.21. after discussing various case laws on the subject the supreme court in iqbal singh marwah (supra) at para 25 held ..... as follows:-"interpretation 25. an enlarged section 195(1)(b)(ii), whereby the bar created by the said provision would also operate where after commission of an act of forgery the document is subsequently produced in court, is capable of great misuse. as pointed out in sachida nand singh [(1998) 2 to crl.m.c. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //