Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 4 results (0.054 seconds)

Ramesh Kumar Sharma Vs. Smt. Akash Sharma

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2008HP78,II(2008)DMC315,2008(1)ShimLC399

..... office and the residences of his superior officers using abusive language against him, humiliated him in the presence of his colleagues and superior officers. all these acts caused mental cruelty to the appellant. the respondent had filed two divorce petitions. these were compromised in the fervent hope that the respondent would live normally, ..... is, having illicit relations with his sister-in-law (bhabi), smt. sushma devi. these wild allegations have caused great mental cruelty to the petitioner. the acts mentioned above have caused great mental harassment to the petitioner and she has deserted the petitioner for more than two years without any reasonable cause,(ii) that ..... . there is no cohabitation between the parties since 1982 as admitted by the respondent. although the concept of mental cruelty cannot be cribbed and confined to particular acts, the decision of the hon'ble supreme court in samar ghosh v. jaya ghosh : (2007)4scc511 , lays down the principles applicable. the court held:98 .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Pramodh chand and others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... died due to vomiting and dysentery. pw11 had not suspected any foul play regarding the death of sakina. 16. therefore, we are of the considered view that there was no act directly or indirectly of curetly done by the accused persons which can be brought under sections 498-a and 306 of the indian penal code such view of ours is .....

Banwari Lal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1067

..... . the first question which arises for considerations is -- whether conviction can be based on the sole and uncorroborated testimony of an approversection 133 of the evidence act, provides :-- 'accomplice :-- an accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon ..... the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.' illustration (b) to section 114, evidence act, further provides :-- 'the court may presume that an accomplice is unworthy of credit unless he is corroborated in material particulars.' 18. dealing with the scope ..... in ram narain v. state of rajasthan, (1973) 3 scc 805 : (1973 cri lj 914) and it was held :--'........ section 133, indian evidence act, which falls in chapter ix dealing generally with witnesses, expressly provides that an accomplice is a competent witness and the conviction is not illegal merely because it .....

Himachal Road Transport Corporation and ors. Vs. Krishna Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : III(2005)ACC277,2006ACJ1248

..... . as held above, she was definitely above 55 years and, therefore, the multiplier of 10 would be just and reasonable. in fact as per the second schedule to motor vehicles act a multiplier of 8 is provided for this age group, but keeping in view the fact that the mother is a widow, multiplier of 10 is deemed reasonable. the compensation ..... at rs. 1,500 per month or rs. 18,000 per year.17. while fixing a multiplier, the courts can take guidance of the schedule attached to the motor vehicles act. it is also by now well settled and the supreme court has repeatedly laid down that while fixing multiplier, it is not only the age of the deceased, but also ..... deepak gupta, j.1. this appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act is directed against the award passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal, bilaspur in the claim petition no. 25 of 1990, decided on 30.8.1993 whereby an award of .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Nanak Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2009ACJ2240,2008(3)ShimLC518

..... has deposed that the claimant did not approach him nor did he again examine the witness.24. the present case pertains to the claim petition under the motor vehicles act and not a prosecution under the indian penal code. therefore, the degree of proof required to prove a fact is not beyond reasonable doubt but preponderance of probability.25 ..... heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record.mr. a.k. sharma has assailed the award for the reason that petition under section 166 of the 'act' was not maintainable as negligence was neither pleaded nor proved and the tribunal erred in holding to the contrary. pursuant to the registration of the f.i.r., ..... driver who is also the owner chose not to lead any evidence and the insurance company, vide order dated 1st march, 2002 was permitted under section 170 of the 'act,' to take all defences and led evidence to prove the same.8. appreciating the material on record, the tribunal held respondent no. 2 to have driven the tractor in .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Sudershan Kumar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... this is not the registration number of the vehicle, in which 130 bags of what had been loaded. it has come in evidence, per testimony of pw-5 shri bal krishan, a clerk from the office of registration and licencing authority, solan, that registration no.hp-14-0198 is of a scooter and not of any truck. gate ..... sudershan kumar and ramesh chand i with offences, under sections 120-b, 408, 218 of the indian penal code, and section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. the other two respondents were charged with offences, under sections 120-b and 420 of the indian penal code. 8. prosecution examined 17 witnesses, besides proving some documents ..... three others, who were tried for offences, under sections 120-b, 409, 218 & 420 of the indian penal code, and section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988, have been acquitted. 2. respondent sudershan kumar was working as incharge of h.p. state civil supplies corporation, chambaghat, a suburb of solan town, and respondent ramesh .....

Tilak Singh Vs. Shashi Bijulwan and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : II(1998)ACC297,1999ACJ661

..... another aspect of the case. the defence that policy had lapsed because of sale of the vehicle is not available to the insurance company under section 149 (2), motor vehicles act, 1988 [see: lalita prabhakar's case, 1998 acj 1124 (hp)].21. the learned tribunal, therefore, committed an error in absolving the insurance company, respondent no. 4, of ..... the insurance policy was got transferred in favour of the appellant.6. respondent no. 5, bal krishan, the previous owner of the scooter denied his liability and it was pleaded that he had sold the scooter to the appellant much prior to the accident.7. ..... , namely:(a) the deceased was a pillion rider and the insurance policy did not cover the liability of a pillion rider; and(b) the original insured was one bal krishan, the respondent no. 5 in this appeal. he had sold the scooter to the appellant before the accident. neither any intimation of such sale was given nor .....

Pradeep Kumar and ors. Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2001CriLJ1517

..... , (1993) 2 scc 684 : (1993 cri lj 1635), while dealing with a similar question, the hon'ble supreme court held as follows (para 2) :section 32(1) of the evidence act is an exception to the general rule that hearsay evidence is not admissible evidence and unless evidence is tested by cross-examination, it is not creditworthy. under section 32, when ..... reliable, there is no rule of law or even of prudence that such a reliable piece of evidence should not be acted upon unless it is corroborated. a dying declaration by itself is an independent-piece of evidence and can be acted upon, without seeking any corroboration, if it is found to be otherwise true and reliable.17. in case kundula bala .....

Green World Corporation Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : I(2007)ACC441,2007ACJ1472,(2006)205CTR(HP)524,[2006]285ITR118(HP),2006(2)ShimLC22

..... for the assessment year 2000-01 ?(2) whether the commissioner of income-tax, in exercise of his revisional jurisdiction, under section 263 of the income-tax act, could have advised/directed the assessing officer to reopen the assessments for the earlier assessment years, pertaining to the respondent (assessee-firm) ?15 for appreciation of ..... order after conducting survey, under section 133a of the income-tax act, the commissioner of income-tax could not have interfered with the same even though he held a view different from that of the assessing officer. he ..... on the merits. while addressing the arguments, learned counsel for the parties mainly confined their submissions to the scope of section 263 of the income-tax act, pertaining to the revisional jurisdiction of the commissioner of income-tax. learned counsel for the respondent-assessee urged that when the assessing officer had passed the .....

Tej Deen Vs. H.R.T.C. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ShimLC485

..... on the ground of conduct which has led to his conviction on a criminal charge. but the right to impose a penalty carries with it the duty to act justly. considering the facts of this case, there can be no two opinions that the penalty of dismissal from service imposed upon the appellant is whimsical.we ..... bound to take into consideration all the attending facts and circumstances of the case before imposing an order of punishment. while exercising such power, the disciplinary authority must act reasonably and fairly. the respondent occupied the lowest rank of the cadre. he was merely a contingency peon. continuation of his service in the department would not ..... from the pleadings that the petitioner was convicted by the sub divisional judicial magistrate, tehog on 26th december, 1984, under sections 41 and 42 of the indian forest act. the appeal preferred by him was rejected by the learned sessions judge. the criminal revision no. 103 of 1986 preferred by the petitioner was rejected by this .....