Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 section 107 enrolment paper Page 13 of about 4,850 results (0.191 seconds)

Delhi Development Authority, Through Its Vice Chairman Vikas Sadan Vs. ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

..... in unnecessary litigation by approaching the national commission and then this court. the trust should sensitize its officers to serve the public rather than justify their dictatorial acts. it should avoid such an unnecessary litigation.? 33. in ravinderkaur vs ashok kumar, air 2004 sc 904, the apex court has made the following ..... the increase. statutory authorities exist to discharge statutory functions in public interest. they should be responsible litigants. they cannot raise frivolous and unjust objections, nor act in a callous and highhanded manner. they cannot behave like some private litigants with profiteering motives. nor can they resort to unjust enrichment. they are ..... preliminary objections stating that the complaint is false and frivolous and therefore liable for outright rejection with cost in terms of section 26 of the act. it is further stated that the respondent has neither proved any deficiency in service nor proved any negligence on the part of the petitioner. moreover .....

Dr. Gangaraju Sowmini and Another Vs. Alavala Sudhakar Reddy and Anoth ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... bodily injury to persons arising out of the use of motor vehicles, include claims for compensation under section 140 and section 163a. section 166 of the act provides for making an application for award of compensation arising out of an accident of the nature specified under section 165(1). the provision under section 166 ..... may, keeping in view the cost of living by notification in the official gaette, from time to time amend the second schedule. ? chapter xii of the act deals with claims tribunals and section 165 obligates the state government to establish motor accidents claims tribunals for adjudicating upon claims for compensation in respect of accidents involving ..... whether non-dependant heir of the deceased who died in a motor accident is entitled to lay claim for compensation under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 where there is no other dependant legal heir claiming compensation ? in view of the general importance of the question referred, this court has requested learned .....

T. Krishna Pandian Vs. K.S. Bharath Kumar

Court : Chennai

..... padmavathy and another vs. n.narayanan] wherein this court held that even assuming that the petitioner is entitled to claim benefits of section 53-a of the transfer of property act, the agreement should specifically and expressly state the waiver of rent. (iv) (2005) 8 supreme court cases 252 [sait nagjee purushotham and co. ltd., vs. vimalabai ..... petition nor he led any evidence to show that his need is bonafide. in the absence of such evidence, the rent controller and the first appellate authority acted contrary to law in allowing the petition of the landlord by directing the eviction of the tenants. in such circumstances, the high court was fully justified in ..... the bona fide requirement of the previous landlord who was the plaintiff under section 10(iii)(c) of the andhra pradesh buildings (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1960 could not survive after the plaintiff had transferred his right, title and interest in the demised premises by executing a registered sale deed dated may 11, .....

Chhaya Devi & Anr vs.rukmini Devi & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... plaintiffs, accordingly, it is directed that the ========================================================== page 17 of 18 i.a. 9618/2017 in cs(os) 285/2017 defendants are restrained from acting upon the notice dated 08.08.2017 and the resolutions passed in the consequential meeting dated 26.08.2017, which was permitted to be held by ..... mrs. chhaya devi, the director under proposed removal, with a request to make her representation, if she desires, in accordance with a provisions of the companies act. yours faithfully 1. rukmini devi 2. jyoti kumar arya 3. jyoti, kumar arya huf ========================================================== page 8 of 18 i.a. 9618/2017 in cs(os ..... factory (india) private limited registered office: new area sikahdarpur, pc muzaffarpur bihar-842001 india dear sir/madam, subject: special notice u/s 115 of the companies act, 2013 for removal of mrs. chhaya devi from the office of director. we, rukmini devi (6000 shares), jyoti kumar arya (5850 shares), jyoti kumar arya .....

Growth Leasing and Finance Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in : (1998)66ITD67(Ahd.)

..... suffered heavy losses and accordingly the maharashtra government declared it as a relief undertaking under the provisions of the bombay relief undertaking (special provisions) act, 1958 and it was also referred to bifr for revival. nirlon also suffered heavy losses and was not in a position to pay back even ..... ii) lease rentals 7,49,856 ----------- the government of maharashtra declared nsfcl as a relief undertaking under the provisions of the bombay relief undertaking (special provisions) act, 1958. nsfcl has made reference to the board for industrial & financial reconstruction (bifr) for determination of measures to be adopted with respect to the company ..... lakhs towards lease rental.fourthly, the government of maharashtra had declared nirlon as a relief undertaking under the provisions of bombay relief undertakings (special provisions) act, 1956. on 31st march, 1988, a reference was also made to the board for industrial reconstruction for determination of measures to be adopted for revival .....

Most Shakuntala Mehta Vs. The Steel Authority of India Limited Through ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... in the area meant for garage (for upper floors), there was encroachment by this appellant. hence, provisions of the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act, 1971 is applicable and these facts make the present case different from the facts of the banatwala & company versus l.i.c. of india & another case ..... entertain this letters patent appeal mainly for the following facts and reasons: (i) initially notice was given under the public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act, 1971 and the same was adjudicated upon vide order dated 06.10.2006 and the order of eviction was passed by the estate officer; (ii) this ..... ps & po bokaro steel city, district bokaro; 4. the estate officer, bokaro steel city, po & ps bokaro steel city, district-bokaro. ...respondents --- coram :- hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice ratnaker bhengra --- for the appellant : mr. sunil kumar, advocate. for the respondents : m/s indrajit sinha, arpan mishra & amitabh prasad, advocates. .....

Hari Lal Vs. Balvantia and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998(2)AWC1069

..... deeds were executed during pendency of the suit. such sale deeds are hit by doctrine of lis pendens enshrined in section 52 of the transfer of property act. the defendants-appellant who purchased the property with full knowledge of her right to receive maintenance cannot now be permitted to defeat this important right by purchasing ..... defendants in whose favour the property has been transferred during pendency of the suit. for this purpose, in our opinion, section 39 of the transfer of property act is the appropriate provision under which the plaintiff-respondent could claim maintenance against the transferees. section 39 reads as under :'39. transfer where third person is ..... plaintiff was decreed by judgment and decree dated 27.3.1997, aggrieved by which the present appeal has been filed under section 19 of the family courts act.9. we have heard counsel for the appellant and the respondents. learned counsel for the appellant assailing the impugned judgment of the family court has submitted .....

Pardeep and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)2PLR505

..... on their business therein. the state of haryana, without considering the nature of structures, existing on the land, issued a notification, under section 4 of the act, dated 29.11.2001, proposing to acquire land in villages nagal kalan and kundli for the ostensible public purpose, namely, for the development and utilization as ..... , dated 7.3.2003, detailing the constructions, raised by the petitioners. despite this report, the land acquisition collector served a notice, under section 9 of the act, requiring the petitioners to submit their respective claim qua compensation.4. it is argued that as the petitioners have raised constructions, in the shape of houses, a ..... certain caveats, primary among them being that the structures should be in existence on the date of the issuance of the notification under section 4 of the act and the released land should be capable of adjustment, within the proposed planning. a plea for release, duly considered within the parameters of the policy, would .....

National Cooperative Consumers Federation of India Limited Vs. the Ori ...

Court : Kolkata

..... 2006) 11 scc 651 rodemadan india ltd v. international trade expo centre ltd. the view was expressed in the context of the applicability of section 42 of the 1996 act to a petition under section 11 thereof.12. the petitioner also relies on the unreported delhi judgment to say that even in such case the court recognised that disputes between ..... to arbitration if the arbitrator is nominated by the respondent or by its chairman-cum-managing director. the petitioner says that a request under section 11 of the 1996 act is not carried to a court but it is a request that has to be made to a chief justice or his designate. for such purpose the petitioner ..... court of law.' the court emphasised, in chief conservator of forests v. collector, that the '(v)arious departments of the government are its limbs and, therefore, they must act in coordination and not in confrontation.'8. the petitioner attempts to assert that it is not under the control of the central government and, for such purpose, it relies on .....

X Vs. Y

Court : Mumbai

..... as withdrawn; (vii) on 31.01.2008, the respondent filed special civil suit no. 4 of 2008 under section 18 (2) of the hindu adoption and maintenance act against the appellant, his sister, father, elder sister in the court of cjsd ahmednagar. in that suit, the respondent claimed that she was entitled to recover rs.45 ..... right in recording the finding that the husband had successfully established the case of desertion by the wife and exercising the discretion vested under section 13-a of the act, the learned trial judge had granted the decree of judicial separation instead of divorce? 16. the judgments of the supreme court referred to above clearly establish that ..... later affirmed by the supreme court in the case of lachmanutamchand kripalni vs. meena (air 1964 sc 40), whilst dealing with a case of desertion under the hindu marriage act, 1955, in the following words. once desertion, as defined earlier, is established there is no obligation on the deserted husband ( taking the case where he is .....