Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 chapter i preliminary Page 7 of about 596 results (0.270 seconds)

Sep 20 1972 (SC)

Dhrangadhra Chemical Works Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1973)2CTR(SC)30

..... i by a notification issued in that behalf from time to time by the government :'(a) an octroi on animals or goods, or both, brought within the octroi limits, for consumption, or use, or sale therein.'clause 4 (1) states that the government may, be notification in the official gazette, make, or may from time ..... sanctioned :'resolution''the following bye-laws of the dhrangadhra municipality are hereby sanctioned as per sections 48-1 and 61 of the bombay district municipality act, 1901 which act has been adopted by the government of saurashtra.'buy-laws made by dharangadhra municipality for octroi.'the dhrangadhra chemical works has taken objection against the rates ..... 60 and with the sanction of the appropriate authority may impose, for the purpose of the act, any of the taxes, namely :'59 (1) (iv) : an octroi on animals or goods, or both, brought within the octroi limits for consumption, use or sale therein.'section 60 (a) (ii) provides that every municipality before imposing a tax shall, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 01 2016 (HC)

Pinky Jain & Anr. Vs.m/s Ameya Universal Project Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... are entered between the parties in good faith and by reposing the trust upon each other 8. that the accounts books were maintained by the defendant relating to the partnership business for the ..... for development and marketing of the developed portion in the aforesaid project was undertaken by the defendant and the defendant was authorized to receive/collect the entire sale consideration in respect of the fsi from the prospective buyers in respect of developed portions in the project.7. that the partnership business and the agreement ..... fact. on the other hand, in his prayer clause, the plaintiffs have sought dissolution of partnership without disclosing any contingency as mentioned in chapter vi of the act. the plaintiffs start their submissions in the plaint as under:1. that the directors namely mr. deepak gupta & mr. sanjay gupta of the defendant were known .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2000 (TRI)

Standard Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)(68)ECC489

..... to the appellants for having misclassified the product with a view to evade the central excise duty and concealed the true facts from the excise department and removed the goods in a clandestine manner without paying proper duty.they were called upon to pay the differential duty and penalty was also proposed to be imposed on them. the ..... . mafatlal apparel mfg. co. ltd. were also drawn by the officers on 8-3-1983 and documents were also seized. the statements of shri b.r. desai, deputy sales manager of m/s. mafatlal apparel mfg. co. ltd. was recorded. the preliminary investigations by way of scrutiny of all the records showed that m/s. mafatlal apparel mfg ..... hdpe coated fusible interlining fabric as bleached sheeting, dye sheeting, mafinised sheeting etc. under t.i. 191-11 of the erstwhile 1st schedule of the central excises & salt act, 1944 instead of declaring the same as hdpe coated fabric classifiable under t.i. 19-11 of erstwhile tariff up to 27-2-1986. they also disputed of having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2000 (TRI)

Carrier Aircon Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)(159)ELT315TriDel

..... 18 claimed by the assessees but fall under exclusion clause, and thus are not refrigerators or freezers or refrigerating/freezing equipment. the notice proposes classification of the goods in dispute under heading 84.19 which covers machinery and plant designed to submit materials (solids/liquids, gasous) to a heating or cooling process in order ..... swastic coalers.4. in the light of the above decisions, we hold that the revisionary authority has exceeded its power under section 35e of the central excise act by travelling beyond the record of proceeding before the adjudicating authority and, therefore, remanding of the matter is not justified. accordingly, we set aside the impugned order ..... own motion, call for and examine the record of any proceeding in which an adjudicating authority subordinate to him has passed any decision or order under this act for the purpose of satisfying himself as to the legality or propriety of any such decision or order and may, by order, direct such authority to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 14 1975 (HC)

M.S. Shawhney, Asstt. Collector of Customs and anr. Vs. Sylvania and L ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1988(19)LC192(Bombay); 1987(30)ELT126(Bom)

..... of levy of customs duty is postponed until a bill of entry is presented. on the contrary, if such were the correct effect of the scheme of the act an importer of goods can escape from levy of customs duty by importing them at a place other than a customs port or a customs airport. that such a thing is not conceivable ..... , upto which date the exemption notification was to be operative. in that view of the matter, having regard to the provisions of section 25(1) of the act read with the exemption notification the goods imported by the respondent per s.s. 'steel fabricator' were exempted from the duty of customs, from the payment of the whole of that portion of the ..... place only when a bill of entry is presented or thereafter. if such were the correct view in a large number of cases person may import goods into india contrary to the provisions of the act and escape from levy and payment of customs duty. in our opinion, the learned judge was right in taking the view that as in the present .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 1976 (HC)

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas686(Bom)

..... should know the nature of the accusation made, secondly, that he should be given an opportunity to state his case and, thirdly, the authority should act in good faith. no materials should be relied on against him without his being given an opportunity of explaining them. (4) tribunals or authorities exercising quasi-judicial ..... : (1) under the mrtp act, the commission has no jurisdiction to investigate the petitioner's position and status as a monopolistic undertaking in respect of production or sale of a monopolistic undertaking simpliciter. (2) having regard to the provisions of ss. 10,37,38 and 50 of the mrtp act, the proceedings before the 1st ..... selling and supplying, inter alia, j. k. engineering files with brand names of 'sunflower', 'sher', 'rock', etc. is a monopolistic undertaking engaged in the manufacture, sale and supply of the steel files; and that it is indulging in restrictive trade practices of the following nature : (i) abnormally increasing the prices of the said steel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1976 (HC)

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. A-1 Engineering Company

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(Bom)485; [1976]37STC608(Bom)

..... thus : ''tax' means sales tax, general sales tax or purchase tax payable under this act.' the opening part of section 2 makes it clear that this definition is applicable ..... court.' certain other relevant provisions of the said act may also be conveniently noticed at this stage. clause (18) of section 2 of the said act as it read prior to 7-4-1957 defined the word 'tax' thus : 'tax means the sales tax, general sales tax, purchase tax or outside goods purchase tax payable under this act.' from 7-4-1957 the said clause read .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2003 (HC)

Hardeo Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : 2003(3)BLJR2099; [2003(4)JCR15(Jhr)]

..... specially because the petitioner (contractor) never became the owner of those goods as those goods was never transferred.(6) admittedly, the government department has purchased iron, steel and cement material under section 13(1)(g) of the bihar finance act, 1981 on payment of concessional sales tax for the purpose of government use, as such the department ..... bars so that the department may take arrangement accordingly.' ..... ..... ..... .....5. the issue relating to levy of tax on the sale or purchase of goods by states on the transfer of property in goods involved in execution of works contract as inserted by clause (b) of article 366(29-a) has already been decided by the ..... cement and iron & steel on handing over of structure in question to the state government, it is open to the state to levy sales tax on such deemed transfer of property in goods in execution of works contract.7. in the circumstances, there being no merit, all the writ petitions are dismissed. however, there shall .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2008 (SC)

Bajaj Auto Ltd. Vs. Director General (i and R) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC2269; 2008(5)ALLMR(SC)953; III(2008)CPJ1(SC); JT2008(7)SC92; [2008]84SCL200(SC); 2008AIRSCW4052; AIR2008SC2269; 2008(4)Supreme518

..... 7.9.1994 brings the case within the purview of section 33(1)(f) of the act. section 33(1)(f) is reproduced as under:33.(1) xxxx xxxx xxxx (f) any agreement to sell goods on condition that the prices to be charged on re-sale by the purchaser shall be the prices stipulated by the seller unless it is clearly stated ..... any areas or market for the disposal of the goods;4. it is further alleged against the appellant that it fixed the sales targets in respect of various products and imposed a restriction on the dealer to purchase one or more products as a condition is covered under section 33(1)(b) of the act. section 33(1)(b) is reproduced as under ..... :33.(1) xxxx xxxx xxxx (b) any agreement requiring a purchaser of goods, as a condition of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 1916 (PC)

Moothetuth Kanari Vs. Hari Shenoy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 34Ind.Cas.428

..... the cases cited therein. consequently the provisions of chapter xxxi of act xiv of 1882 apply to the case of a person who is a lunatic, although he has not been so found on enquiry ..... is now settled law that the provisions of the old code of civil procedure apply to persons adjudged to be of unsound mind under act xxxv of 1858 as well as to those who are not so adjudged. see kadala reddi v. narisi 24 m.d 504 and ..... to infants whether plaintiffs or defendants) shall, mutatis mutandis, apply in the case of persons of unsound mind, adjudged to be so under act xxxv of 1858, or under any other law for the time being in force.' so that apparently it was confined in terms to ..... the suit was brought to declare the nullity of a sale in execution. there they agreed that there was a perfectly good judgment against the deceased person during his lifetime but the proper parties were not added before the sale. it seems to me that completes the chain in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //