Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 chapter i preliminary Page 5 of about 596 results (0.131 seconds)

Feb 22 1921 (PC)

Jayanti Venkayya and anr. Vs. Damisetti Sathiraju and Six ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1921)ILR44Mad714

..... by the appellate court. it would obviously be so if the decree of the appellate court had varied the preliminary decree passed by the lower court and there are no good reasons for applying different rules as regards questions arising under article 181, when the appellate court affirms the decree of the lower court and when it varies it. consequently, ..... was set aside in the first court, that time then began to run under article 97 and that consideration did not fail afresh when the order setting aside the sale was affirmed by the appellate court. here, as in the well-known case of bassu kuar v. dhum singh (1889) i.l.r., 11 all., 47 (p.c.) the ..... . somasundaram as to whether the starling point for an application for a decree absolute under order xxxiv, rule 5, civil procedure code, which is governed by article 181 of the limitation act, is the date of the original decree or the date of the appellate decree which affirmed the original decree.2. it had long been regarded as well-settled in this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2008 (FN)

Earl Cadogan (Appellant) Vs. Pitts and Another (Respondents) and One O ...

Court : House of Lords

..... so as to exclude the possibility of the flat tenants acquiring any interest in any part of the building, especially if there are good reasons, based on other provisions of the 1993 act, to hold that they should not be so construed. in my opinion, when one turns to provisions other than the opening part ..... that acquired by the participating tenants. 10. consistently with this restriction on the calculation of marriage value, paragraph 3 originally excluded from the market on a hypothetical sale of the freehold only the nominee purchaser and the participating tenants. the presence of the non-participating tenants in the market remained to be taken into account. ..... reason why he would bid a sum higher than the pure investment value. hope value represents the additional value to a third party who contemplates a future sale to the tenant. taking into account marriage value assumes that the hypothetical purchaser is the tenant, while taking hope value into account assumes that the hypothetical .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1994 (TRI)

In Re: Seqonds and Powls Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... to bring home a charge of unfair trade practice it is necessary to show that the erring trader has, for the purpose of promoting the sale of his goods, adopted any unfair method or unfair or deceptive practice including the practice of making a statement whether orally or in writing or by visible representation ..... of unfair trade practices relating to the period prior to august 1, 1984, cannot be examined by the commission under the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act as the provisions relating to unfair trade practices are not retrospective in operation. unfair trade practices are in the nature of economic offences and the provisions ..... had clearly indulged in unfair trade practices attracting the provision's of section 36a(1)(i), (vii) and (viii) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 2. the commission ordered a preliminary investigation which confirmed the allegations made by the complainant. as a result, the director (research) who had conducted the investigation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1976 (HC)

J.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. R.D. Saxena, Director of Investigation and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas323(All)

..... is likely to restrict, by any method the persons or classes of persons to whom goods are sold or from whom goods are bought ;..... (d) any agreement to purchase or sell goods or to tender for the sale or purchase of goods only at prices or on terms or conditions agreed upon between the sellers or purchasers ..... of the proceedings pending before the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission. the petitioner is a limited liability company registered under the companies act. it carries on business of manufacture and sale of nylon yarn. on 19th september, 1973, an agreement was entered into between four nylon spinners, viz., the petitioner and ..... the rules, within the ministry of commerce and he has the responsibility for securing equitable distribution of silk and non-cellulosic fibres under the essential commodities act and under the art silk textiles (production and distribution) control order, 1962. all aspects of nylon relating to price control and distribution are dealt .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2001 (HC)

Laxmi Rolling Mills Vs. C.E.G.A.T., New Delhi

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002(80)ECC84; 2002(142)ELT327(All)

..... in india,shall be an amount equal to the aggregate of the duties of customs which would be leviable under section 12 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), on like goods produced or manufactured outside india if imported into india, and where the said duties of customs are chargeable by reference to their value; the ..... respondents in writ petition no.204 of 2001 have been heard.5. a preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondents is that since the goods were purchased by the petitioners during auction sale at barabanki which falls within the jurisdiction of lucknow bench of allahabad high court, the principal bench at allahabad has no jurisdiction to hear ..... by the railway or when the same were auctioned. no duty is leviable at the time of sale of excisable goods after the same have been used by the party concerned. entry no. 73.02 of chapter 73 of the central excise tariff act, 1985 reads as follows :'railway or tramway track construction material of iron or steel, the following .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2003 (HC)

Friends Overseas (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2004]136TAXMAN94(Delhi)

..... by the assessing officer, wherein he stated that the said entries were made by the accountant of the assessed in respect of certain transactions which he had conducted for sale of diamonds worth rs. 15 lakhs, brought by him to delhi. he, however, admitted that he was not assessed to income-tax. not being satisfied with the ..... of certain cash transactions, was found and seized.3. after making some preliminary enquiries the assessing officer issued a notice to the assessed under section 158bc of the act, directing it to file its return for the block period ending 17-11-1995. in deference to the said notice, return was filed declaring nil income.4. ..... the present appeal are as follows :the assessed, a private limited company, incorporated under the companies act, 1956, is engaged in the exports of handicrafts goods. on 17-11-1995 a search and seizure operation under section 132 of the act took place at the business premises of the assessed and the residences of its directors. during the course .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 1921 (PC)

Jayanti Venkayya and anr. Vs. Damisetti Sathiraju and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1921Mad514(1); (1921)41MLJ117

..... the appellate court. it would obviously be so if the decree of the appellate court had varied the preliminary decree passed by the lower court, and there are no good reasons for applying different rules as regards questions arising under article 181 when the appellate court affirms the decree of the lower court and when it varies it. consequently an ..... for a decree absolute where the preliminary decree is under appeal, an application so much resembling an application for execution that under the repealed chapter of the transfer of property act it was held by this court to be one. that was a question which their lordships were not considering.4. the view that for the purposes of such an ..... was set aside in the first court, that time then began to run under article 97 and that consideration did not fail afresh when the order setting aside the sale was affirmed by the appellate court. here, as in the well known case in basu kuar v. dhiim singh i.l.r. (1888) all. 47 the question their lordships .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2005 (SC)

Commissioner of Customs (General), New Delhi Vs. Gujarat Perstorp Elec ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2005(101)ECC577; 2005(186)ELT532(SC); JT2005(7)SC490; (2005)7SCC118

..... , it includes whatever apparatus is used by a businessman for carrying on his business, - not his stock-in-trade which he buys or makes for sale ; but all goods and chattels, fixed or movable, live or dead, which he keeps for permanent employment in his business.'41. the court also referred to functional test ..... , plans, processing data and other literature comprised in the 'documentation service' specified in the agreement would constitute 'book' and hence 'plant' within the meaning of the act. the court, therefore, held that it was clearly of the opinion that the capital asset acquired by the assessee, namely, the technical know-how in the shape of ..... whether those documents in the form of 'documentation service' under the agreement could be said to be 'book' and 'plant' within the meaning of the income tax act and whether the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation? the court considered two questions; viz. (i) whether the 'documentation service' agreed to be and actually rendered .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1998 (HC)

Collector of Customs Vs. Dytron (India) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1999(108)ELT342(Cal)

..... had made an application before the learned single judge for cancellation of the sale. the application has since been dismissed.10. before us it was contended by the customs authorities that by virtue of the provisions of the customs act, 1962 the goods could not have been removed from the warehouse at all without payment of ..... the customs authorities either to confiscate the goods or to collect the duties payable thereon,20. in this case the customs authorities have stated that it raised the claim against the company under section 72(1) of the 1962 act demanding duty and interest and isssued a detention-cum-sale notice under section 72(2). it is ..... 1995 and 28th june, 1995 have unfortunately been already given effect to. nevertheless, the customs authorities cannot be deprived of their rights merely because the sale of the warehoused goods has taken, place without payment of duty or their statutory claims. the learned judge erred in not passing any order on 5th july, 1995 permitting the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2015 (HC)

Vazhathope Service Co-Operative Bank Vs. Agri Bio Care

Court : Kerala

..... to facilitating the promotion and development and enhancing the competitiveness of such enterprises and the impact thereof on such enterprises. under section 15 of the act, where any supplier, supplies any goods or w.p(c) no.14734/12-n & w.p(c) no.15329/12-m13renders any services to any buyer, the buyer shall ..... the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitionerss, pointing out that the claim for damages on account of irregularity in maintaining their account enabling the sales officer to withdraw amounts without their knowledge causing them loss, when the partners of 1st respondent alone were authorised to operate their account and the loss ..... fertilizer; the petitioners bank remitted the payment towards the bill amount of each consignment, in the account of 1st respondent with the petitioners bank and the sales officer has withdrawn the same and given them acknowledgement for the same signed on printed vouchers. the 1st respondent had preferred a complaint before the idukki police .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //