Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 chapter i preliminary Court: monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission mrtpc Page 1 of about 1 results (0.065 seconds)

In Re: Seqonds and Powls Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

..... to bring home a charge of unfair trade practice it is necessary to show that the erring trader has, for the purpose of promoting the sale of his goods, adopted any unfair method or unfair or deceptive practice including the practice of making a statement whether orally or in writing or by visible representation ..... of unfair trade practices relating to the period prior to august 1, 1984, cannot be examined by the commission under the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act as the provisions relating to unfair trade practices are not retrospective in operation. unfair trade practices are in the nature of economic offences and the provisions ..... had clearly indulged in unfair trade practices attracting the provision's of section 36a(1)(i), (vii) and (viii) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 2. the commission ordered a preliminary investigation which confirmed the allegations made by the complainant. as a result, the director (research) who had conducted the investigation .....

Consumer Education and Research Vs. T.T.K. Pharma Ltd. and ors.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1990)68CompCas89NULL

..... and shares already figure in the definition of goods under the sale of goods act it seems that the object in overemphasising shares and stocks to be "goods" under the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act is that they are not limited only to purchase and sale as the sale of goods act, 1930, is concerned with. as i have ..... restrictive trade practices act. the definition of the word "goods" as given in section 2(e) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act has already been reproduced. it means goods as defined in section 2(7) of the sale of goods act. the definition of the word "goods" in the sale of goods act reads as under : '"goods' means every kind ..... for granted that the shares do not come into existence, they are "future goods" within the meaning of section 2(6) of the sale of goods act. the definition of "future goods" in the aforesaid provision reads as under : '"future goods' means goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after the making of .....

Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. and anr.

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1994)81CompCas784NULL

..... any policies which have the effect of preventing, restricting or lessening of competition, which is prejudicial to consumer interest ; (b) continue to manufacture and promote sales of all major brands of soaps (accounting for 90 per cent. of turnover) formerly manu- factured by tomco before the proposed merger, and to the extent ..... before the submission of the present complaint. (c) with the deletion of sections 20 to 26 of chapter iii and the consequential amendments inserted in the act under act no. 58 of 1991, effective from september 27, 1991, the commission ceased to have the power to review proposed mergers, amalgamations, takeovers and expansion of ..... respondents before the bombay high court) null and void.14. the interim injunction prayed for under section 12a of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act is that the respondents be restrained from putting into practice the impugned agreement. the agreement impugned in these proceedings by the complainants is the proposed scheme .....

Director-general of Vs. India Cements Limited

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : (1987)62CompCas382NULL

..... ltd., dhun building, 827 anna salai, madras (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent").2. the respondent is a company registered under the companies act and is engaged in the manufacture and sale of cement. the price and distribution of cement to the extent of 67% of the production is controlled by the central government and the said ..... 31. the restrictive trade practice of making the stockists confine their sales within the specified area, is saved by clause (k) of sub-section (1) of section 38 of the act which reads as under : "that the restriction is necessary to ensure the maintenance of supply of goods and services essential to the community." 32. the contention of ..... the respondent produced shri n. ramakrishnan (rw-1). he stated that he was acting as sales manager and that he was looking after the execution of the agreements relating to the sale of cement by the various stockists, that the maximum price for the sale of cement used to be fixed from time to time and that the stockists .....

Director General of Vs. Hindustan Lever Limited

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in : I(2004)CPJ10MRTP

..... than the mrf and local market price. this has been possible among other things because of appreciating the philosophy of consumer co-operatives, leading producers of consumer goods have been allowing some extra discount to such consumer stores. as these consumer stores are working in the best interest not only of their thousands of members ..... from the redistribution stockists at par with other retailers in case they find the discounts allowed to the redistribution stockists at higher rates.11. as regards the sales promotion schemes to be made applicable to the stores/ kendriya bhandar/super bazar, we find force in the arguments of the management that these are not only ..... . these practices are contended to be restrictive trade practices as covered under section 2(o) and section 33(1)(e) of the monopolistic trade practices act (in short "act). it is prayed that inquiries be instituted against the said respondents and cease and desist order be passed against them.2. in view of the same .....