Ryot - Judgment Search Results

Ryots of Garabandho Vs. Zemindar of Parlakimedi

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1945)47BOMLR525

to other parts of the King's dominions, and operates, within certain limits, in British India.3. The appellants are ryots of three villages included in the Parlakimedi estate in the district of Ganjam in the Northern Circars. The

Ryots of Garabanda, Vs. Zamindar of Parlakimedi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1938Mad722; (1938)1MLJ68

Chapter XI of the Madras Estates Land Act for a settlement of rents in respect of all the ryoti villages in his estate, and Government acceded to his request. A special Revenue Officer was thereupon appointed to

Ryots of Garabandha, Sariapalli and Ramachandrapuram Village, Garabhan ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1938)2MLJ154

was a fallacious one and had previously been rejected by this Court in Valluri Narasimha Rao v. The Ryots of Peddamamidipalli I.L.R.(1925) Mad. 499. If the present application were made merely under Section 109(c) of the Code

Ryots of Garabandho and Other Villages Vs. Zemindar of Parlakimedi and ...

Court: Privy Council

to other parts of the King's dominions, and operates, within certain limits, in British India. The appellants are ryots of three villages included in the Parlakimedi estate in the district of Ganjam in the Northern Circars. The

Vinay Devanna Nayak Vs. Ryot Seva Sahakari Bank Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC716; 2008(1)BomCR523; 105(2008)CLT673(SC); 2008CriLJ805; 2008(1)KLT1(SC); 2008(3)MhLj394; (2008)149PLR194; (2008)2SCC305; 2007AIRSCW7844; AIR2008SC716; 2008(2)SCC305; (2008)1SCC(Cri)351; 2008CriLJ805; 2008(2)CivilLJ225; ILR2007(2)Kar1387; 2008(3)KCCR1281; 2008(1)AIRKarR478

Petition No.1003 of 2005.3. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant herein was a member of Ryot Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd., Basgod, Taluka Ankola ('Complainant Bank' for short). He had obtained a loan of Rs.20,000/-

Govt. of A.P. and Others Vs. Displaced Ryots Association of Pothunuri ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(6)ALD706; 1998(6)ALT409

ORDERUmesh Chandra Banerjee, CJ 1. This writ appeal has been placed in this list for hearing after having an order of remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration of the Appeal. The Supreme Court, while...

Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka Vs. Ryots Agricultural, Pr ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1978]115ITR709(KAR); [1978]115ITR709(Karn)

Venkataramaiah, J. 1. The common question referred to us under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (herinafter referred to as 'the Act'), in these two cases which relate to the assessment years 1965-66 and 1967-68...

Sri Sri Sri Rathnamala Pattamahadevi, Zamindarini Vs. the Ryots of the ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1933)65MLJ423

1925, there was a decision of Devadoss and Waller, JJ., which held in Valluri Narasimha Rao v. The Ryots of Peddamamidipalli I.L.R. (1925) 49 Mad. 499 that a revision petition lies under Section 115, Civil Procedure Code,

(Valluri Srivat) Sanka Rao Vs. the Ryots of Kalagampudi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1926Mad480

of the parties; in other words he determines the rights and liabilities of both the landholder and the ryot. His proceedings are governed by the Civil Procedure Code: vide Section 192. Part B of the Schedule of

Velluri Narasinha Rao, Proprietor of Pedamamidipalli Vs. the Ryots of ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 94Ind.Cas.164

of the parties; in other words he determines the rights and liabilities of both the landholder and the ryot. His proceedings are governed by the C. P. C:, vide Section 192. Part B of the Schedule of