Restriction - Judgment Search Results

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Steel Age Industries Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas607NULL

1. This is an application by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as "the Registrar") against M/s. Steel Age Industries

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Ex-cello India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas605NULL

1. The Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements has filed the present application under Sections 10(a)(iii) and 37 against 5 parties. Of these, the

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Centron Industrial Alliance Pvt.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1978)48CompCas813NULL

In this context, according to the learned counsel for the respondents there was no danger whatsoever of limitation, restriction or distortion of competition from the side of the respondents by reason of the exclusive arrangements with Home

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Chandan Metal Products Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

1. This is an application filed by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as " the Registrar ") against the respondent

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Usha Sales Private Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

the meaning of Section 33(1) read with Section 2(o) of the Act, inasmuch as they related to territorial restrictions and exclusive dealings in respect of the sale of the respondents' products. It was also contended that the

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Escorts Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1979)49CompCas243NULL

1. This is an application filed by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements (hereinafter referred to as " the Registrar") praying that the respondent may be directed to make

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Shriram Pistons and Rings Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1979)49CompCas126NULL

no justification for the amendment application, that the amendment would be justified only if it related to a restrictive trade practice, that para. 6 of the original and amended applications of the Registrar referred only to Section

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

view of the fact that the rate as well as the amounts of discount paid are negligible the restriction will not directly or indirectly restrict or discourage competition to any material degree and is not likely to

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. United Breweries Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1989)65CompCas656NULL

in pursuance of the said agreement; (c) the terms and conditions further impose on respondent No, 2 a restriction that respondent No. 2 shall carry out such technical directions in manufacturing and processing of beer including directions

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1976)46CompCas470NULL

that Clauses 1 and 3 of the aforesaid standard agreements (annexure I to the application) provided for territorial restriction or allocation of area or market, Clauses 6 and 13 provided for resale price maintenance and Clause 14