Require - Year 2014 - Judgments

Jan 15 2014 (HC)

“3. the Appellant Was Required to ExplaIn Each Day of Delay. in the ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-15-2014

..... p1 which in substance is as under paras 3 and 4 3 the appellant was required to explain each day of delay in the case in hand there was delay of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 2014 (HC)

Appellant Vs. Respondent

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-20-2014

acr no 3 of 2013 in the high court at calcutta ordianry original civil jurisdiction pashupati roy sarda ors before...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 03 2014 (HC)

Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industry and Others Vs. State of Mahara ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-03-2014

..... viz bombay pune thane ulhasnagar kolhapur solapur sangli nasik and nagpur competent authorities are required to ensure that construction of flats for the weaker sections of the society on ..... and a proceeding involving an opportunity to show cause to the defaulting landholder are required to enable the government to pass an order withdrawing the exemption thereafter further investigation and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 2014 (FN)

In the Case of Margus Vs. Croatia

Court: European Court of Human Rights

Decided on: May-27-2014

..... to everyone within its jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in the convention also require by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when ..... furthermore none of the international materials cited clearly articulates a rule of international law requiring states unconditionally to annul retroactively the effects of amnesty laws enacted and applied in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2014 (TRI)

Lt Col Sanjeet S. Sahai Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on: Jan-02-2014

..... was selected as an announcer in the said mwg and he was required to reach hyderabad on 6 10 2007 to attend the training capsule ..... as per para 122 of ao 45 2001 ms and they are required to award marks in accordance with the impression of the assessment made ..... remarks both adverse and advisory remarks by any reporting officer s are required to be communicated to the ratee oelig as per para 121 c .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2014 (HC)

P. Rajalakshmi and Others Vs. M. Lakshmesh and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-05-2014

..... the 1st defendant society therefore the interest of the appellants allottees requires to be kept in mind and a balance has to be ..... the lands specified in the schedule to the said notification were required for public purpose for formation of layout between magadi road and ..... extent which is adverse to the interest of 20th defendant requires to be set aside point no 4 is answered accordingly 60 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 01 2014 (HC)

Shri Tarsem Kumar Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-01-2014

..... to each of the officers with respect to whom he is required to report upon for completion during the year performance appraisal ..... 2008 prior to that only adverse remarks in the acr were required to be communicated for representation if any the then existing ..... of an officer on the various parameters on which he is required to be assessed the reviewing officer too cannot abdicate his responsibility .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2014 (HC)

Dig K.P.S. Raghuvanshi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-04-2014

..... of the petitioner for the mandatory period of 90 days as required under the extant policy as contained in coast guard order ..... the petitioner for the mandatory minimum period of three months as required by the coast guard order 04 2005 and contrary to ..... rules the vacancies were existing and that the eligible candidates were required to be considered in accordance with the prevailing rules therefore the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2014 (HC)

Argued By:- Mr. M.L. Sharma Advocate Vs. State of HaryanA.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-25-2014

rfa no 1269 of 1993 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh 1 rfa no 1269...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 22 2014 (FN)

R (on the Application of Hs2 Action Alliance Limited and Others) Vs. t ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-22-2014

..... article 1 4 is to exempt legislation falling within its scope from those requirements exemption from the requirements of the directive cannot be conditional upon compliance with them otherwise there ..... mean that every possible law should be subject to an environmental assessment the requirement that it be required meant that freely taken political decisions on legislative proposals are not therefore .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Require - Judgment Search Results