Require - Judgment Search Results

Corporation of the City of Nagpur Vs. Ramdas Mahadeorao Gulhane and an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1980CriLJ597

..... it was a case under the essential commodities act section 6 a of that act required that whenever an essential commodity was seized it had to be produced without any reasonable ..... as the point involved for consideration here is concerned section 6 a of that act required that whenever an essential commodity was seized it had to be produced without any reasonable .....

Doma and anr. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1981CriLJ653

..... with the performance of any public duty and it was observed that if both these requirements are satisfied it matters not the least what is the nature of his office whether ..... with the performance of any public duty and it was observed that if both these requirements are satisfied it matters not the least what is the nature of his office whether .....

Habib Ullah and anr. Vs. Gh. Ahmed Baba and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: AIR1980J& K23

..... to introduce restrictions in the exercise of this right subject of course to the overriding requirement of the restriction being reasonable 5 section 15 of the right of prior purchase act ..... by a neighbour on the sole ground that his property stood adjoining the one sold required examination 30 a similar view taken by a full bench of this court in sewanath .....

Bachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;

..... of sentence and provided with standards to guide its use of the information the first requirement that there should be a bifurcated proceeding at which the sentencing authority is apprised of ..... assumption that certain articles in the constitution exclusively deal with specific matters and where the requirement of an article dealing with a particular matter in question is satisfied and there is .....

United States Vs. Kubrick

Court: US Supreme Court

..... benefits in the same manner as if such disability were service connected the regulations require the applicant for benefits to show that the disability proximately resulted through carelessness accident ..... consequences can be reconciled with the traditional purposes of statutes of limitations which conventionally require the assertion of claims within a specified period of time after notice of the .....

Gannett Co., Inc. Vs. Depasquale

Court: US Supreme Court

..... defendant to a fair trial so as to justify exclusion the sixth and fourteenth amendments require that the states take care to determine that those circumstances exist before excluding the public ..... are properly carrying out their duties in responsibly and capably administering justice and it would require unusual circumstances for this right to be held subordinate to the contention of a defendant .....

D.S. Rege Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1979Bom311

..... legislature from making a reasonable classification for the purpose of legislation that classification was required to pass two tests namely that it must be founded on an intelligible differentia ..... by adopting judicial norms and must provide full indemnification to the affected owner the requirement to institute an appropriate enquiry for determining compensation must be deemed to be implicit .....

Collector of Puri Vs. Kamala Kanta Das

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1979Ori147; 47(1979)CLT613

..... entertainment of appeal it denotes that the appeal cannot be admitted to consideration unless other requirements are complied with the provision of sub section 1 of section 173 permits filing of .....

Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabh ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC1896; (1980)ILLJ137SC; (1980)2SCC593; [1980]2SCR146

..... reasoning in hindustan tin works moreover rationalisation of re absorption of the removed workmen requires attention to the classification of permanent workmen and their casual counterparts every proposal must ..... such circumstances the management did not straightaway terminate their services but gave individual notices requiring the concerned workmen to show cause why their names should not be struck .....

The Sirsilk Limited Vs. the Distillery Officer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)2MLJ216

..... rule 42 is illegal in so far as it does not require the first respondent while levying penalty to prove the contumacious conduct ..... rule shall be final 15 the trichy distilleries executed the bond as required by rule 33 it was agreed between trichy distilleries and sirsilk ..... has executed a bond in favour of the first respondent as required by rule 35 or rule 38 of the madras distillery rules .....