Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 section 139 repealed Page 20 of about 313 results (0.060 seconds)

Tejaram Gahlot Vs. Pukhraj Kalani and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1973Raj138; 1972()WLN798

..... scrutinised it and made the endorsements which may be translated verbatim in the interest of exactitude.'i have scrutinised this nomination paper under section 36 of the representation of the people act and i make the following decision. the candidate shri narain is absent his proposer shri mohanlal is absent. the deputy chief election officer, rajasthan, ..... shri narain's nomination paper was improperly rejected the election of shri pukhraj kalani should be set aside under section 100(1)(c) of the representation of the people act. respondent pukhraj kalani contests the position. he says that because the nomination paper of shri narain was eventually accepted the case is not attracted ..... by section 100(1)(c) of the representation of the people act. if the nomination paper was improperly accepted then unless it is averred and it has not been so averred that it materially affected the .....

S. Ramachandran, M.L.A. Vs. Hon'ble Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislat ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1994Mad332

..... the; competent authority for taking decision thereon. on the above reasoning, the general secretary was requested to comply with the provisions of the representation of the people act and then send details for taking further action. it will be useful to reproduce the letter in full which is as follows:---by special ..... 1993. to,the chief election commissioner,election commission of india,nirvachan sadan, ashok road, new delhi-110001.sub: intimation under section 29-a of the representation of the people act, 1951-- regarding change of office bearers.we hereby intimate the election commission of india, the following changes in the office bearers and also, ..... the very same date, the petitioner sent intimation to the chief election commissioner of india, new delhi, the 3rd respondent herein under section 29a of the representation of the people act, 1951 regarding the change of the office bearers. the said communication reads thus: phone : 8255941 pattali makkal katchi head office 629, anna salai .....

P. Subramaniam Vs. S. Pachamuthu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1973Mad366

..... returning officer. the supreme court expressed the view that a case of this description would come under sub-section(2)(c) of sec. 100 of the representation of the people act, corresponding to the present section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the act and would amount to holding an election without complying with the provisions of ..... far as disqualification due to age is concerned, durga sankar mehta v. raghuraj singh, : [1955]1scr267 deals with the question. that case was one under the representation of the people act and the question was whether the election tribunal could go into the question whether a person, whose name was found in the electoral roll, could be disqualified ..... shown that he is prohibited by any of the provisions of the act from exercising his vote. their lordships observed that the relevant provisions of the representation of the people act formed a complete code by themselves in the matter of preparation and maintenance of electoral rolls and that it was clear from the provisions that .....

P.N. Balasubrahmanyan Vs. Election Tribunal of North Arcot at Vellore ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1954Mad730

..... deal with the contentions raised by mr. ramaswami aiyar for the successful candidate, the second respondent, that rule 20(2) and (3) made under the representation of the people act, 1950 was 'ultra vires' and invalid and that even otherwise section 25 is not applicable because it is inconsistent with the later act of 1951. ..... the election petition was therefore dismissed.4. before dealing with the contentions laised before us it would be useful to set out the relevant provisions oc the representation of the people act, 1951, which were referred to as having a material bearing on the question to be decided, namely, whether the nomination of the petitioner was ..... the petitioner could not have filled up those particulars on the date of the nomination. he purported to reject the nomination under section 36(2)(d), representation of the people act, 1951.the election was duly held on 8-1-1952 without the petitioner; and the second respondent was declared duly returned. the return was published .....

Ashok. Vs. Rajendra Bhausaheb Mulak.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... bobde that the impugned judgment and order of the high court dismissing the election petitions filed by the petitioners being appealable under section 116a of the representation of people act, 1950, the petitioners could not maintain the special leave petitions under article 136 of the constitution which deserves dismissal on that ground alone. reliance ..... condonation of delay in both the special leave petitions and direct that the slps shall be treated as appeals filed under section 116a of the representation of the people act.6. that brings us to the merits of the controversy in the election petitions filed by the appellants. the election petitions specifically alleged ..... cause of action for consideration by the court so as to entertain the election petition. but the language of section 100 (1) (c) of the representation of people act, 1951 is too clear for any speculation about possibility.5. fortunately, for the respondent/returned candidate, the basis of the election petition filed by .....

Baburao Tatyaji Bhosle Vs. Madho Shrihari Aney

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1961Bom29; (1961)63BOMLR20; ILR1960Bom994

..... corrupt practice made against shri n.l. belekar, the candidate?(2) if so, whether the election petition is liable to be dismissed under section 90(3) of the representation of the people act, 1951, on account of the nonjoinder of this candidate as a party to the election petition'.20. in a judgment which is by no means remarkable for its ..... ii of the petition.10. in schedule i, he wished to add 'names of speakers who made the appeal or use referred to in section 123(3) of the representation of the people act' and among the names mentioned was at items 1 and 3 the name of n.l. belekar, the candidate who had withdrawn. in schedule ii, the petitioner ..... . we are concerned in this appeal with an election from the nagpur-umrer parliamentary constituency held to fill a casual vacancy in the house of the people as required by section 149 of the representation of the people act, 1951, (act no. 43 of 1951) (hereinafter referred to as the act).2. the following dates are material for the purposes of the .....

Namdeo Chimnaji Tapre and anr. Vs. Govinddas Ratanlal Bhatia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1964Bom137; (1963)65BOMLR843; ILR1964Bom114; 1964MhLJ51

..... objection. it is argued that each petitionershould have made a separate deposit. the matter fallsto be decided by the provisions of section 117 of the representation of the people act and section 117 requiresthat 'the petitioner shall enclose with the petition a government treasury receipt showing that the deposit of rs-2000/- has ..... 1962, which is endorsed on the reverse of ex. 125. that order was as follows:'in accordance with the provisions contained insection 36 of the representation of the people act 1951,i examined and scrutinised this nomination paper andorder as below : there is a difference in the surnames of both the candidate, and ..... election petition was presented by the twoappellants namdeo chimanji tapre and namdeo wakujlaraj. they claimed to be electors within the meaningof section 81 of the representation of the people act. theyalleged several grounds on which they claimed that theelection of the first respondent ought to be declared void.the principal ground was that the .....

Faiju Mahadeo Chandekar and ors. Vs. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hin ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1964Bom160; (1963)65BOMLR755; ILR1964Bom210; 1964MhLJ25

..... authorities' constituencies. we do not think that rule 30 is at all attracted in the present case.15. no doubt, the several provisions of the representation of the people act and of the rules framed thereunder make provision for tha preparation of the electoral rolls and in those provisions so far as assembly and parliamentary elections ..... definite object. the object is to be culled from the provisions of the rules made under the bombay village panchayats act read with the provisions of the representation of the people act and the registration of electors rules, 1960, upon some provisions of which mr. junankar on behalf of the respondent no. 6 very strongly relied. ..... this behalf......', in other words, it is not the law that the electoral roll of the bombay legislative assembly once prepared under the provisions of the representation of the people act, ipso facto becomes the list of voters for the ward or the village concerned at any ensuing panchayat election. it is that electoral roll of .....

Sakharam Vithoba Salunkhe Vs. Shankar Babaji Sawant and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1964Bom228; (1963)65BOMLR780; ILR1964Bom229

..... shall be an electoral roll which shall be prepared in accordance with the provisions of the representation of the people act, 1930, under the superintendence, direction and control of the election commission. sections 16 to 20 are not material to the present discussion. section ..... . it is therefore clear that this section is not applicable to other matters connected with the poll. 23. now electoral rules are prepared under the representation of the people act, 1950, and the relevant sections are sections 14 to 25. section 14 is a definition section, section 15 indicated that for every constituency there ..... back of this ballot paper the name 'sawant shankar 'babaji.' according to him this was sufficient to identify the voter and since the principle under the representation of the people act, 1951, is that of election by ballot, his objection should have been upheld. he relied for this purpose on the case bf woodward v. .....

H.R. Gokhale Vs. Bharucha Noshir C. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1969Bom177; (1968)70BOMLR466

..... of the said conditions in order to find out that what would be a statement of material facts which the law regards as adequate. section 83 of the representation of the people act, 1951, the heading to which is 'contents of petition', states that an election petition (a) must contain 'a concise statement of the material facts ..... of the documents to which the present application related under rule 93(1) of the conduct of election rules 1961, framed under section 169 of the representation of the people act, 1951. this application for inspection was strenuously opposed not only by mr. mody on behalf of the 8th respondent who was the successful candidate at the ..... , the petitioner is entitled, under the provisions of order 11, rule 15 of the code of civil procedure which is made applicable by section 87 of the representation of the people act, 1951, to have inspection of all documents to which reference is made in the pleadings; and (2) on the ground that inspection should be granted .....