Represent - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: represent Year: 2011 Page 1 of about 573 results (0.132 seconds)Ms. Chandana Brothers Shopping Mall, Re Vs. Ms. Urvasi Enterprises,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-14-2011
..... schedule properties e 3 for granting a permanent injunction against the defendants restraining them their representatives and their agents from ever interfering with the 2nd plaintiff s management and control of ..... in the said judgment the supreme court held that a pendente lite transferee is a representative in interest of the party from whom he has acquired that interest that rule 10 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner Mysore City Corporation Represented by Its Commission ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-01-2011
..... much prior to and after 2 11 2006 respondents 4 to 26 represented by respondent no 3 8211 trade union too in the claim ..... by the industrial adjudicator was 8220 whether respondents 4 to 26 as represented by respondent no 3 8211 trade union were entitled to be regularized ..... in other words much prior to and after respondents 4 to 26 represented by respondent no 3 8211 trade union in the claim statement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Naval Canteen Service Employees' Union (Reg.no.07-62 of 1990), ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Aug-01-2011
..... of administration naval headquarters the deputy financial adviser n miistry of finance department a representative from the defence department and the deputy director of personnel services naval headquarters as ..... branch the director of personnel services the dy director of personnel representative of the ministry of finance defence representative of the ministry of defence navy and an officer to be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Metal Impacts Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Its Representative Senior ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
as a trade mark of what is shown in the representation or to the exclusive use of the letters appearing in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKerala State Electricity Board, Represented by Its Secretary, Vaidhudh ...
Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram
Decided on: Oct-29-2011
..... it was further submitted that a scene mahazer was prepared in the presence of the representative of the complainant and also that the site mahazer was attested by 2 police constables ..... by 2 police constables and also that it was prepared in the presence of the representative of the complainant who refused to sign in the mahazer it is also submitted by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetal Impacts Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Its Representative Senior Sale ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
Reported in: 2012(2)KCCR853; 2012(3)CTC(IP)15
as a trade mark of what is shown in the representation or to the exclusive use of the letters appearing in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCochIn Shipyard Limited Represented by Its Deputy General Manger Vs. t ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
Reported in: 2011(3)ILR(Ker)904; 2011(4)KLJ276; 2011(4)KLT796; 2011(3)KHC716
..... of this chapter b requiring in any factory or class or description of factories that representatives of the workers employed in the factory shall be associated with the management of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Trs Nirman, Represented by Its Managing Partner, Shri. T. Suresh R ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-26-2011
..... a partnership firm had submitted a tender against an invitation by the south western railway represented by the respondents for the construction of a broad guage line between kadur and chikkamagalur .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhu Product, Proprietor Rawat Singh Parihar Represented by His S.P.a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-02-2011
prayer these writ petitions are filed praying to set aside the impugned order dated 01 10 2011 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGanesh Gayatri Granites, Represented by K. Ravi Kumar Vs. M/S. L and T ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-25-2011
typed to the dictation of smt m shreesha honble member aggrieved by the order in c d no 52 2007...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial