Represent - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: represent Year: 1949 Page 1 of about 315 results (0.056 seconds)The Province of Madras Represented by the Collector of Tanjore Vs. Sri ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-1949
Reported in: (1949)2MLJ454
..... by the sri vedaranyeswaraswami devasthanam at vedaranyam for a declaration against the province of madras represented by the collector of tanjore as the first defendant that a portion of the sannadhi .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProvince of Madras, Represented by the Collection of Tanjore Vs. Sri V ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-13-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Mad95
..... by the sri vedaraniaswaraswami devastanam at vedaraniam for a declaration against the province of madras represented by the collector of tanjore as defendant 1 that a portion of the sannadhi street .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Governor-general in Council, Owning the Madras and Southern Mahrat ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Mad438
govind menon j 1 the main and important point for consideration is whether the suit is barred under article 30...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalla Surayya and Sons Represented by Kalla Venkataraju Vs. the Provin ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-1949
Reported in: (1949)1MLJ379
satyanarayana rao j 1 this civil revision petition was referred to a bench by mack j as he felt that...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGannamani Ramanna as Representing the General Body of Creditors in I.P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Mad184
..... the official receiver west godavari bad to be included in his representative capacity as defendant 3 in this suit in the place ..... be pleased to add the official receiver west godavari in his representative capacity as defendant 3 this petition was allowed but the ..... here rightly or wrongly the official receiver was added in his representative capacity and this includes the one under which he is now .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGhulam Kadir and anr. Vs. the Municipal Council Negapattinam Represent ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-07-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Mad460
..... 19th april 1940 defendants 7 to 10 were described as minors represented by guardian defendant 2 they were however majors at the ..... 10 there is no substance in the contention that the legal representatives of defendant 8 were not brought on record actually some ..... civil procedure 1908 second appeal for setting aside court sale legal representatives of defendant no 8 already brought on record x another .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGannamani Ramanna as Representing the General Body of Creditors Vs. Do ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-1949
Reported in: (1949)2MLJ128
..... the official receiver west godavari had to be included in his representative capacity as a third defendant in this suit in the place ..... be pleased to add the official receiver west godavari in his representative capacity as a third defendant this petition was allowed but ..... here rightly or wrongly the official receiver was added in his representative capacity and this includes the one under which he is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Kshatriya Sandarare Nadar Uravinmurai at Usilampatti, Represented ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-07-1949
Reported in: (1949)1MLJ608
..... the prior plaint was returned on 10th august 1946 and then without any attempt to represent the plaint in the sub court in 1947 the plaintiff filed a fresh plaint in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChunilal Vs. the Governor-general in Council as Representing G.i.P. Ra ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-23-1949
Reported in: (1949)1MLJ538
..... lost in transit he sued the m s m and the g i p railways represented by the governor general in council to recover the value of its contents namely rs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna Charan GuIn Vs. Governor-general in Council, Representing B.N. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-08-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Cal100,54CWN154
..... to be the price of goods consigned for carriage by the b n railway administration represented by the defendant opposite party and not delivered to the consignee 2 the facts of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial