Removable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: removable Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 592 results (0.064 seconds)U.P. State Bridge Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-07-2000
Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC809
..... it is the fact that these two materials are never removed or removable we cannot comprehend as to how the adjudicating authority treated ..... bolting and once concrete demanded under their is set these are removed heading from february and used in further 1987 concreting 4 demand ..... where concreting is to be done in layer of shuttering is removed which have been erected in pieces by using nuts amp .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTimes Bank Ltd. Vs. Sri Sharada Parmeshwari Textiles
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: May-29-2000
Reported in: (2000)101CompCas412
1 this is a petition filed under section 141 of the companies act 1956 the act against sharada parmeshwari textiles...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsgar S. Patel and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-25-2000
Reported in: (2000)160CTR(SC)307
flat no 201 2nd floor new jaldarshan perry cross road bandra west bombay was owned by one hemant chawla hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.N. Khanna Vs. B.K. Khanna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-21-2000
Reported in: 2000(55)DRJ544
devinder gupta j 1 there two appeals arise out of common order dated 14 7 1999 passed by learned single...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBasant Nahata Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Nov-28-2000
Reported in: 2001(1)WLC433; 2001(1)WLN226
..... exercise of its powers under section 92 a of the act of 1959 can cause removal of trespasser unauthorised occupant from public land public street or public amenities of public use .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSahruvan Nachair and Another Vs. V.S. Mohammed HussaIn Maracair and 3 ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-30-2000
Reported in: AIR2001Mad36; 2001(75)ECC20; (2001)1MLJ188
..... from the defendants the suit in o s no 112 of 1986 was filed for removing the first defendant as trustee of the suit property declaring the second and third defendants ..... of the trust and he is unfit to be trustee and he has to be removed from the trusteeship the second and third defendants are residents of singapore and once in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSelvi J. Jayalalitha Vs. State Rep by Addl. Superintendent of Police, ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-13-2000
Reported in: 2001CriLJ3074; 2000(2)CTC116
order1 the petitioner first accused in c c no 4 of 1997 and c c no 13 of 1997 on...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindco Sales Ltd. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2000
Reported in: 2001IIIAD(Delhi)649; 2001(57)DRJ129; [2001]248ITR465(Delhi)
..... of a writ of certiorari is that the writ can be availed of only to remove or adjudicate on the validity of judicial acts the expression judicial acts includes the exercise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2000
Reported in: (2001)78ITD16(Delhi)
1 this appeal preferred by the assessee is directed against cwt appeals order dated 31 12 1996 relating to the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Geeta Devi Napit Vs. Smt. Krishna Gupta and Two ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-13-2000
Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT221; 2001(2)MPLJ219
orders c pandey j 1 this is plaintiff s appeal under order 43 rule 1 a of the code of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial