Skip to content


Regarding - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: regarding Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 313 results (0.18 seconds)
Jan 03 2007 (TRI)

Precision Tool Room and Moulding Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-03-2007

Reported in: (2007)(116)ECC486

..... the ratio s are not applicable 5 the ld counsel for the appellants submits with regard to para 5 observations of the learned commissioner while filing the refund application various statements .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 2007 (TRI)

Gujarat Borosil Ltd. and Shri Vs. Ccex

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Jul-10-2007

Reported in: (2007)(120)ECC438

..... penalty of equal amount under section 11 ac on the appellant company are justified as regards the penalty imposed on shri ashok jain there is no justification for imposition of penalty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 19 2007 (TRI)

Singh Transporters Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-19-2007

Reported in: (2008)12STJ208CESTATNew(Delhi)

..... the facts are different in that case as there was no mining it is only regarding transportation of goods 4 in view of the board circular whereby scope of service is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 2007 (TRI)

Arunoday Steel Industries Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-11-2007

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC326

..... immovable property therefore are liable for duty 5 we find that there is no dispute regarding capacity of the tanks we find that board vide circular dated 15 1 02 relied .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 2007 (TRI)

Metro Shoes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-24-2007

Reported in: (2007)8STR502

..... this amount for the limited purpose of stay they are not contesting this amount as regards the credit relating to manufacturing activity it was stated that revenue has circulated draft cenvat .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 2007 (TRI)

Rambagh Palace Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-24-2007

Reported in: (2008)12STJ210CESTATNew(Delhi)

..... is not warranted and the applicant has made out a case for partial waiver having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case it is directed that on the applicant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 2007 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Lafarge India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-09-2007

..... this is an extra burden on the respondent and therefore costs may be awarded having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we direct that costs quantified at rs .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 2007 (TRI)

Adm India Enterprises Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-10-2007

Reported in: (2008)12STJ53CESTATNew(Delhi)

..... 2 the learned counsel on behalf of the appellant submits that there was a dispute regarding levy of service tax on such activity therefore the appellant obtained registration from the central .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 2007 (TRI)

Weldflux Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-18-2007

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC39

..... by the ld jdr and perused the records the issue involved in this case is regarding the denial of modvat credit to the appellant on the duty paid by the supplier .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 18 2007 (TRI)

Mccoy Architectural Systems Pvt. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-18-2007

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC335

..... of work this heading attracts nil rate of duty under the tariff itself the plea regarding classification under cet sub heading 7308 50 has not been raised before the commissioner and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //