Regarding - Year 1996 - Judgments

Nov 26 1996 (SC)

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Matter Regarding Brick K ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-26-1996

Reported in: JT1998(7)SC460; (1998)9SCC149

..... only 137 have filed the objections following are the recommendations of the committee in this regard i moving chimney brick kiln should not be permitted in delhi as it is highly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 1996 (TRI)

Hindalco Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-12-1996

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT519TriDel

..... be an input used in the manufacture of final product doubt may arise only in regard to the use of some articles not in the mainstream of the manufacturing process but .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 17 1996 (TRI)

Elpro Instrumentation Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-17-1996

Reported in: (1998)(100)ELT500Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 230 watts the item cannot be classifiable under the heading in question the technical literature regarding to the oscilloscope shows that the input of the power supply is 90 130v 180 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 1996 (TRI)

J.K. Synthetics Limited Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-16-1996

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT684TriDel

..... that such accessories and spare parts were compulsorily supplied alongwith the d g sets in regard to composite price of these out attention has been drawn to invoice placed in annexure .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 1996 (TRI)

Regent Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-16-1996

Reported in: (1997)(89)ELT88TriDel

..... for condonation of delay considering the fact that this is only the supplementary appeal in regard to issue when appeal has already been filed we condqne the delay and take up .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 13 1996 (TRI)

Hekotronics (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-13-1996

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT682TriDel

..... the appellants have admitted that their product was an electrical instrument used in telecommunication having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case we find no infirmity in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 13 1996 (TRI)

Leader Engg. Works Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-13-1996

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT38TriDel

..... on the facts of this case the deemed credit may be allowed to them as regards certain other inputs aluminium and brass scrap copper wire pig iron body bonnet aluminium ingots .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 13 1996 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Sri Chamundeswari Sugars Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-13-1996

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT581TriDel

..... by notification no 223 76 dated 3 8 1976 and by other succeeding notifications having regard to our finding in the previous paragraph that the scope of the proviso to notification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 1996 (TRI)

Shree Arun Packaging Corporation Vs. Collector of C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-12-1996

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT417TriDel

..... it therefore cannot be classified under chapter 49 as the products of printing industry as regards appellants contention about s h 4818 19 it is observed that heading 4818 19 covers .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 1996 (TRI)

Hyderabad Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-18-1996

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT431TriDel

..... but were correctly classifiable under sub heading 8474 00 from 1 3 1986 9 having regard to the above discussions and findings we uphold the impugned order and reject the appeals .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Regarding - Judgment Search Results