Refusable - Judgment Search Results

City of Houston Vs. Hill

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 3 1982 eight months after the lawsuit began hill was arrested for refusing to leave the immediate area of a car with an unknown ..... thereof he f congregates with other persons in a public place and refuses to comply with a lawful order of the police to disperse ..... charged with such crimes as failure to remain silent and stationary remaining refusing to remain silent and talking 789 f 2d 1103 1113 1114 .....

Societe Nationale Vs. District Court

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dilatory and expensive system of letters rogatory or letters of request other countries have refused adequate judicial assistance because of the absence of a treaty or convention regulating the ..... that an american court s order ultimately requiring discovery that a foreign court had refused under convention procedures would constitute the greatest insult to the sovereignty of that tribunal .....

iCC Vs. Locomotive Eng'rs

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 701 a 2 which precludes judicial review of action committed to agency discretion by law refusals to reopen have traditionally been reviewed only when new evidence or changed circumstances are alleged ..... 296 1974 more importantly for present purposes all of our cases entertaining review of a refusal to reopen appear to have involved petitions alleging new evidence or changed circumstances that rendered .....

Ricketts Vs. Adamson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... meaningless first degree murder charges could not be reinstated against respondent if he categorically refused to testify after sentencing even if the agreement specifically provided that he would so ..... question whether an insurance company s notification to a policyholder that it would henceforth refuse to continue paying disability benefits constituted a breach of the contract the court ultimately .....

Director-general of Vs. Hindustan Lever Limited

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1989)66CompCas51NULL

..... practice pressed at the time of hearing is the respondent s refusal to deal with its redistribution stockist 54 before dealing with this ..... conceived in monopolistic purpose or market control even an individual s refusal to deal may violate the statute 55 in the enquiry ..... trade practice of termination of stockistship of one stockist and resultant refusal to deal with him is concerned it could be argued .....

United Paperworkers Vs. Misco, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... appeals erred in setting aside the arbitral award on public policy grounds a court s refusal to enforce an arbitrator s interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement is limited to situations ..... court does not reach the issue upon which certiorari was granted whether a court may refuse to enforce an arbitration award rendered under a collective bargaining agreement on public policy grounds .....

Goodman Vs. Lukens Steel Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... practices in failing to challenge lukens discriminatory discharges of probationary employees in failing and refusing to assert instances of racial discrimination as grievances and in tolerating and tacitly ..... of harassment which were indisputably racial in nature and that the unions had regularly refused to include assertions of racial discrimination in grievances that also asserted other contract .....

Fall River Dyeing and Finishing Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as the bargaining agent for petitioner s employees and to begin collective bargaining petitioner refused the request at that time a majority of petitioner s employees were ex sterlingwale ..... in essentially the same enterprise but without their bargaining representative having the new employer refuse to bargain with the chosen representative of these employees disrupts the employees morale deters .....

Ramappa Alias Ramachandrappa Vs. Venkappa Reddy

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1987KAR3172

..... to 6 and respondent 1 before the trial court were refused by the respective natural guardians the notices were therefore affixed ..... the second time notices were served on the house on refusal of personal service only thereafter advocate marulaiah was appointed as the ..... obligation to the minor defendants it is proved that rogappa refused to act as guardian for his minor children obviously as noticed .....

Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1987)(13)ECC226

..... used by the company in the manufacture of dross and skimmings refuse or scum thrown off during the process of manufacture cannot by ..... aluminium sheets and certainly not for the manufacture of scum and refuse like dross and skimmings dross and skimmings cannot be called a ..... dross and skimmings 24 the bombay high court had observed that refuse or scum thrown off during the process of manufacture cannot by .....