Refusable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: refusable Year: 1984 Page 1 of about 1,561 results (0.017 seconds)United States Vs. Stauffer Chem. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-10-1984
..... an administrative warrant authorizing the private employees to conduct the inspection after respondent refused to honor the warrant the government began a civil contempt proceeding against respondent ..... an administrative warrant authorizing the private contractors to conduct the inspection and stauffer refused to honor the warrant stauffer then instituted an action in united states district .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOm Prakash Sood and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-03-1984
Reported in: AIR1985HP53
..... not invest the state government or any of its officers with the arbitrary power of refusing to take any action on the contrary it is their statutory duty to conform to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEscorts Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-09-1984
Reported in: [1985]57CompCas241(Bom)
..... of the facts and circumstancestaken note of by the boardsof directors the board decidedto refuse registration of theshares under consideration accordingly it was resolved that the transfer of2 38 ..... petitioner company in fact this allegation of the petitioners the lic emphatically deadens and stoutly refuse this installation 211 the petitioners rightly contended that it was the avowed and declared .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWelsh Vs. Wisconsin
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-15-1984
..... lawful the trial court ultimately concluding that petitioner s arrest was lawful and that his refusal to take the breath test was therefore unreasonable issued an order suspending petitioner s ..... of both probable cause and exigent circumstances justified the warrantless arrest the decision at the refusal hearing which was not held until september 1980 was therefore preordained in fact the primary .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMinnesota Vs. Murphy
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-22-1984
..... incriminating statements in the criminal trial did not rest on the ground that a refusal to furnish incriminating information would have justified revocation of probation although the court recognized ..... to reinforce and capitalize on murphy s ignorance that he had a right to refuse to answer incriminating questions and the officer deliberately and effectively exploited those opportunities finally .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNlrb Vs. City Disposal Systems, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-1984
..... though brown acted alone in asserting a contractual right his refusal to operate the truck constituted concerted activit y protected by ..... not explicitly refer to the collective bargaining agreement when he refused to drive the truck constituted concerted activity within the meaning ..... moreover there can be no question but that brown s refusal to drive the truck was reasonably well directed toward the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKailash and ors. Vs. Sub-registrar of Assurances, Indore and anr.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-1984
Reported in: AIR1985MP12
..... no 72 of the indore development authority and the directions of the additional collector regarding refusal of such registration these extraneous considerations have no place in discharge of statutory duties ..... instructions issued by the collector indore in pursuance to which the sub registrar had refused registration of the document firstly no such instructions have been placed on record even .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGrove City Coll. Vs. Bell
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-28-1984
..... regulations the college was a recipient of federal financial assistance and when the college refused to execute an assurance of compliance with title ix s nondiscrimination provisions as required ..... coeducational liberal arts college that has sought to preserve its institutional autonomy by consistently refusing state and federal financial assistance grove city s desire to avoid federal oversight has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChingleput Bottlers Vs. Majestic Bottling Company
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-15-1984
Reported in: AIR1984SC1030; 1984(1)SCALE832; (1984)3SCC258; [1984]3SCR190; 1984(16)LC570(SC)
..... executive have to reach their decisions by taking into account relevant considerations they should not refuse to consider relevant matter nor should they take into account wholly irrelevant or extraneous ..... drawn a distinction between initial applications for grant of licence and the revocation suspension or refusal to renew licences already granted the learned vice chancellor says that there is a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaIn Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-1984
Reported in: 1987(29)ELT753(Del); ILR1985Delhi164
..... genuine gifts in assesseds appeal the high court and supreme court refused to interfere with the finding of thetribunal this very question ..... where their orders have become final the collector has simply refused to look at them he has not even attempted to ..... respondents in that case the question was whether the government could refuse grant of license tothe respondents even after the filing of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial