Refrainment - Judgment Search Results

Sardar Mohammed Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1990(1)WLN645

k s lodha j 1 petitioner sardar mohammed had challenged the draft scheme published under section 68 c of the...

Himatlal Purshottam Shah Vs. Supadu Pavanu Hadge and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1987(3)BomCR330

sharad manohar j 1 the plaintiff s honest suit for specific performance has been dismissed by the lower appellate court...

City of Boerne Vs. Flores

Court: US Supreme Court

city of boerne v flores 521 u s 507 1997 october term 1996 syllabus city of boerne v flores archbishop...

K Mart Corp. Vs. Cartier, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

k mart corp v cartier inc 485 u s 176 1988 u s supreme court k mart corp v cartier...

Gafur Bandu Mulla and ors. Vs. Khutubbi Mard Kondiba Mulla and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1990(2)BomCR478; (1989)91BOMLR934

m l dudhat j 1 this second appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 22nd june 1979 passed...

J.S. Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2009(3)AWC2782

amitava lala and a p sahi jj 1 the petition raises an interesting question as to whether the petitioner has...

M/S. K.G. Construction and Another Vs. Municipal Corporation for Great ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1999(4)ALLMR142; 1999(4)BomCR729; (1999)3BOMLR339

orderb n srikrishna j 1 these two writ petitions under article 226 of the constitution of india impugn the action...

Deokinandan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

a k ganguly j 1 this writ petition has been filed for quashing the order 11th december 1984 passed by...

Salazar Vs. Buono

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which they were parties is a personal interest created by law in having the state refrain from taking specific actions having obtained a final judgment granting relief on his claims buono ..... dispute must first be determined to date this court s jurisprudence in this area has refrained from making sweeping pronouncements and this case is ill suited for announcing categorical rules in .....

Mitchell Vs. Helms

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but also offensive it is well established in numerous other contexts that courts should refrain from trolling through a person s or institution s religious beliefs see employment div ..... or instructional materials and equipment lent with secular restrictions the school s teachers need not refrain from teaching religion altogether rather the instructors need only ensure that any such religious .....