Rectify - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: rectify Year: 1989 Page 1 of about 237 results (0.032 seconds)Usha Rectifiers Corp (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-1989
Reported in: (1990)LC342Tri(Delhi)
1 in all these three appeals the appellants have challenged the correctness of the orders in original passed by addl...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUsha Rectifier Corpn. (i.) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assitant Commissio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-05-1989
Reported in: [1989]30ITD1(Delhi); (1989)34TTJ(Del)209
orderper chander this appeal by the assessed is directed against the order of the cit a new delhi dated 22...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Wander India Limited
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-1989
Reported in: (1990)(25)ECC315
on merits of the cases these appeals relate to a common issue viz interpretation of notification no 116 69 ce...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Pharmasia (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-28-1989
Reported in: (1990)(25)ECC461
1 the question that arises in this appeal is whether the product namely mediker manufactured by the respondents is used...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHico Products Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-1989
Reported in: (1990)(29)ECC280
1 in the misc application the appellants applicants have prayed for early hearing of their appeal on the ground that...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Bhadrada Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-1989
Reported in: (1991)LC86Tri(Delhi)
1 the issue to be decided in this case is whether silicone emulsion obtained by the appellants by the process...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Warner Hindustan Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-1989
Reported in: (1990)(29)ECC172
..... to nil rate of duty these tablets contain the following ingredients 4 euclyptus oil ip rectified mentioned as nilgirei tailam on label 2 earlier the appellants had also filed a classification ..... i p mentioned on the label by the assessee as pudina 4 euclyptus oil ip rectified mentioned as nilagiri tailam on the label 5 glycerin 6 suearmint oil 7 tartrazine isi .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBarnard Vs. Thorstenn
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-06-1989
barnard v thorstenn 489 u s 546 1989 u s supreme court barnard v thorstenn 489 u s 546 1989...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeshaney Vs. Winnebago Cty. Dss
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-22-1989
deshaney v winnebago cty dss 489 u s 189 1989 u s supreme court deshaney v winnebago cty dss 489...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayan Corporation Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-1989
Reported in: (1990)(31)LC453Tri(Delhi)
1 the facts of the case are that the appellants manufactured silicone emulsion out of duty paid silicone oil prior...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial