Recruit - Judgment Search Results

The Direct Recruit Class-ii Engineering Officers' Association and othe ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1607; (1990)92BOMLR360; [1990(60)FLR918]; JT1990(2)SC264; 1990(2)KarLJ73; 1990(1)SCALE839; (1990)2SCC715; [1990]2SCR900; 1990(2)SLJ40(SC); 1990(2)LC314(SC); (1990)

down the 1941 Rules and the claim of the direct recruits appointed prior to the coming in force of the 1960

Chairman, Railway Recruitment Board Vs. S. Ruban Peter and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)IILLJ92Mad

by Administrative Tribunal of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services

Ex Recruit Manoj Deswal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 142(2007)DLT791

not attested.IV. All classes of discharge.Commanding Officer or officer commanding Recruit Reception Camp or a Recruiting, Technical Recruiting or Deputy Technical

Rajya Sabha Recruitment Cell & Anr vs.jitender Yadav & Ors.

Court: Delhi

DELHI + LPA6962015 % Judgment Reserved on:10. h RAJYA SABHA RECRUITMENT CELL & ANR .Appellants August, 2016 Date of Decision:7. h

Y, Ex. Recruit Anu Sankar Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secre ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

and if found fit, forward an application through the concerned Recruiting Office to the OIC Records, Army Air Defence to consider

SachIn Panwar, Recruit Constable Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

as Constable (Executive) with the respondents, in response to a recruitment advertisement / notice issued in 2006 (Annexure A-3). The applicant

Ex Recruit Shish Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 129(2006)DLT89; 2006(89)DRJ192; 2007(1)SLJ418(Delhi)

routine tests were carried out at the time of the recruitment of the petitioner. The respondents have consequently, illogically and unjustifiably

Ex. Recruit Dharuv Prakash Vs. Uoi and Others

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

for the petitioner was that on the day of his recruitment i.e. on 25.08.1999 in the Form 2(A) which was the

Banking Service Recruitment Board, Madras Vs. V. Ramalingam and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC2861; (1998)8SCC523

ORDER1. This appeal is filed by the Banking Service Recruitment Board, Madras. It pertains to the recruitments made, inter alia,

Ravinder Kumar, Recruit Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

liable to be set aside and quashed. In the present recruitment Shri Braham Prakash, Roll No. 400076, was also involved in