Recorder - Judgment Search Results

Lahari Recording Company Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director Vs. Mus ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2008(3)CTC385; LC2008(2)341; 2008(37)PTC121(Mad)

print and publish a manuscript, or to sell a gramophone record with a view to its public performance, where the acts

Indian Record Manufacturing Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [2008(117)FLR164],(2008)IILLJ575Cal

Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. I have taken up this writ petition for disposal in presence of the learned advocate for...

Taken on Record. Vs. M/S Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhian ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

which was disposed of on 22.3.2013. As per facts on record, the applicant filed above said Arbitration application with a prayer

The Record of the Case Was Burnt in Accidental Fire in High Vs. K.L.Ma ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

for respondent No.2 – Himachal Roadways. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) The record of the case was burnt in accidental fire in High

Saraswati Recording Studio and Others Vs. Ranbir Singh and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

No.409 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision :27. 1.2014 Saraswati Recording Studio and others ....Petitioners Versus Ranbir Singh and others ...Respondents

Trial Court Records Were Also Requisitioned. on 18.07.2013 It Vs. Smt. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Notice of motion was issued on 05.03.2013. The trial Court records were also requisitioned. On 18.07.2013 it Amit Kaundal 2014.04.28 13:48

Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Sourabh Market ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78

ORDER1. Petitioner-M/s. Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore, is defendant in O.S. No. 8125

Punjab Recorders Ltd. Vs. M/S. Magnetic Information Technology Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1995P& H29

being influenced by anything stated herein .9. For the reasons recorded above, I find no merit in the petition and the

George V. Records, Sarl Vs. Kiran Jogani and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2004(28)PTC347(Del)

2003.2. This Court on consideration of documents and material on record, granted an ad-interim ex-parte injunction restraining the defendants from reproducing,

Master Recording Company Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1993(63)ELT60(Mad)

and the counter and reply affidavits filed herein and the records relating to the order in (1) File C. No. V/68/18/70/82-R.C.