Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Recordal - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 07 2024

Radhamma,(Died) Recorded vs Aravindakshan

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-07-2024

DE, MALAYSIA 11 MAYA, W/O.LATE MADHU AND D/O.GOVINDANKUTTY, VADAVATTATH HOUSE, ANNALLOOR P.O. 680 731, THRISSUR DISTRICT. *DIED LRs RECORDED *IT IS RECORDED THAT R11 IS NO MORE AND HER LEGAL HEIR IS ALREADY ON THE PARTY ARRAY


Mar 06 2026

Lahari Recording Co P Ltd vs Jain Television (Mala Publicit

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-06-2026

OSA No. 206 of 2016 and OSA No.207 of 2016 Cause title in OSA No.206 of 2016: Lahari Recording Co. P. Ltd. Rep. by its Managing Director, 4th Floor, TTMC, BMTC Building, Yeshwanthpur Circle, Yeshwanthpur, Bangalore -


Mar 03 2008

Lahari Recording Company Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director Vs. Mus ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-03-2008

Reported in: 2008(3)CTC385; LC2008(2)341; 2008(37)PTC121(Mad)

film, to purport to sell the right to print and publish a manuscript, or to sell a gramophone record with a view to its public performance, where the acts contemplated would, if done, constitute infringements of copyright.13.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 15 2008

Indian Record Manufacturing Company and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-15-2008

Reported in: [2008(117)FLR164],(2008)IILLJ575Cal

Alok Kumar Basu, J.1. I have taken up this writ petition for disposal in presence of the learned advocate for the petitioners and the learned advocate for the P.F. Authority.2. The main grievance of the writ...


Aug 30 2013

Taken on Record. Vs. M/S Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhian ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-30-2013

prayer to revive Arbitration Application No.18 of 2013, which was disposed of on 22.3.2013. As per facts on record, the applicant filed above said Arbitration application with a prayer that in terms of appointment letter dated 31.3.2001


Sep 17 2013

The Record of the Case Was Burnt in Accidental Fire in High Vs. K.L.Ma ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-17-2013

Patiyal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.Ravinder Arora, Advocate for respondent No.2 - Himachal Roadways. NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL) The record of the case was burnt in accidental fire in High Court Building. Paper-book has been re-constructed with the


Jan 27 2014

Saraswati Recording Studio and Others Vs. Ranbir Singh and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-27-2014

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.409 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision :27. 1.2014 Saraswati Recording Studio and others ....Petitioners Versus Ranbir Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER .... Present:


Apr 22 2014

Trial Court Records Were Also Requisitioned. on 18.07.2013 It Vs. Smt. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-22-2014

the same, the appellant filed the present appeal. Notice of motion was issued on 05.03.2013. The trial Court records were also requisitioned. On 18.07.2013 it Amit Kaundal 2014.04.28 13:48 was ordered that the appellant shall pay Rs.15,000/-


Feb 08 2000

Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Sourabh Market ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-08-2000

Reported in: ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78

ORDER1. Petitioner-M/s. Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore, is defendant in O.S. No. 8125 of 1998, and respondent-M/s. SourabhMarketing and Agencies Private


Jul 05 1994

Punjab Recorders Ltd. Vs. M/S. Magnetic Information Technology Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-05-1994

Reported in: AIR1995P& H29

its merits and in accordance with law without being influenced by anything stated herein .9. For the reasons recorded above, I find no merit in the petition and the same stands dismissed with no order as to


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial