Reconstruct - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: reconstruct Year: 1991 Page 1 of about 136 results (0.009 seconds)Himalaya Rubber Products Limited and anr. Vs. the Board for Industrial ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-20-1991
Reported in: (1992)1CALLT279(HC),[1993]76CompCas281(Cal),1992(61)ELT210(Cal),[1993]88STC47(Cal)
sick units would approach the commerce and industries department industrial reconstruction department of the state government with a report in original
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Upper India Couper Paper Mills Co. Limited Vs. the Appellate Autho ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-1991
Reported in: AIR1992Delhi207; [1992]75CompCas653(Delhi); 47(1992)DLT566
..... appellate authority whereby it has upheld the order of the board for industrial and financial reconstruction hereinafter referred to as the board who had decided vide its order dated 17th august ..... scope and effect of section 18 could not arise 3 section 18 itself provides for reconstruction revival or rehabilitation of the sick industrial company and in addition thereto it also provides .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Sewak Prasad Vs. State of U.P., and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-11-1991
Reported in: AIR1991SC1818; [1991(63)FLR365]; JT1991(3)SC84; 1991LabIC1675; 1991(2)SCALE45; 1991Supp(2)SCC114; [1991]2SCR884a; 1991(2)LC364(SC)
..... company shall not be wound up voluntarily except for the purpose of effecting amalgamation or reconstruction of a company on the ground that by reason of its liability it cannot continue ..... a voluntary winding up under the insurance act occurs for the purpose of effecting a reconstruction or amalgamation or on the ground that a company cannot continue its business be cause .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwarna Mahal Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes in Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-23-1991
Reported in: [1991]83STC92(Kar)
k shivashankar bhat j 1 for the assessment year 1976 77 the appellant was assessed to tax under the provisions...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovindaswami (Died) and anr. Vs. Vedanayagam Pillai Represented by Nex ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-1991
Reported in: (1992)1MLJ15
..... the matter the revision is allowed there will be no order as to costs securitisation reconstruction of financial assets enforcement of security interest act 2002 c a no 54 2002 section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLeo Candles Represented by Its Proprietor, Trichy Vs. the Industries C ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-06-1991
Reported in: (1992)1MLJ12
..... so after giving opportunity to the petitioner to put forth his case no costs securitisation reconstruction of financial assets enforcement of security interest act 2002 c a no 54 2002 section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Palanichamy Vs. Muthiah Pillai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-30-1991
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ523
..... revision petition fails and is dismissed there will be no order as to costs securitisation reconstruction of financial assets enforcement of security interest act 2002 c a no 54 2002 section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarammal (Died) and anr. Vs. Kanthamani and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-31-1991
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ539
..... share in these two schedules however there will be no order as to costs securitisation reconstruction of financial assets enforcement of security interest act 2002 c a no 54 2002 section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPeriasamy, Minor, Represented by His Father and Natural Guardian, Kand ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-11-1991
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ553
..... appeal and accordingly this writ appeal fails and the same is dismissed no costs securitisation reconstruction of financial assets enforcement of security interest act 2002 c a no 54 2002 section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Palaniappan Alias K. Subramanian Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu R ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-22-1991
Reported in: (1992)2MLJ561
..... the learned single judge the writ appeal consequently fails and is dismissed no costs securitisation reconstruction of financial assets enforcement of security interest act 2002 c a no 54 2002 section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial